User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 36
  6. 37
  7. 38
  8. 39
  9. 40
  10. 41
  11. 42
  12. 43

Posts by Big League Jew

  1. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by gadzooks Lmao, this is captain falcon isn't it?

    No shit?

    You know damn well just as much as I do that threads like this are just intellectual masturbation.

    You really think someone else is gonna come along and provide an answer that changes your current position on things?

    No, they aren't. I do think people have interesting perspectives sometimes. What's interesting is having you actually try to think about the question and tell us what it means to you rather than trying to undermine it like a retard because you have zero ability to make a genuine contribution towards considering the question.

    And trying to bring up amperes and other physical measures to try and quantify your qualitative claim is completely transparent.


    You're a massive moron. Energy is well defined and well understood as a concept. Just because you don't know shit and won't accept actual information doesn't mean you have an argument, it just means you are a fucking idiot.

    Just fucking drop it while you still have a chance.

    I'll drop my load down your mom's throat faggot.

    You're not spoon feeding shit.

    Yeah, I am. I gave you a literally scientifically true answer and your ignorant ass couldn't accept it. You argued, I laid a smackdown on you, now you're salty as fuck and saying "DURR HOW DARE YOU DEFINE YOUR TERMS?" Kill yourself retard.

    Your initial question was as basic as it gets to begin with.

    You can't ask some basic bitch shit and then be surprised when people expect you to elaborate.

    Nothing basic about it, as evidenced by the fact that you can't seem to wrangle with literally any discussion about it.

    Well guess what cunt stain? I did elaborate. I elaborated in detail.

    But you can't cope with any of this information, what sort of retarded shit ass criticism is "you brought in amperes and shit???" Like what do you want fuckwit, I gave you the most specific answer possible.

    So you zeroed in one singular line where I told you to educate your dumb ass and COMPLETELY dodged the rest, now you're bitching about how I did it anyway but told you you're a fucking retard for needing it?

    I know that on some level you already know this.

    Threads like these are a waste of your (and my) time around here.

    No cunt, you're a waste of time. You only see such an effect in threads you visit because you suck the intellect out of them with your presence.

    You are a black hole of stupidity from which no intelligent thought can escape.
  2. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Every point in time, and every potential, exists simultaneously.

    Nah.
  3. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by GAAAAALM my estate

    Lao
  4. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by CASPER Depends whether its an anchor butt baby or not.

    Anchor assbabies don't get benefits in Florida.
  5. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by gadzooks Energy == potential. Exactly. Potential isn't necessarily physically real.

    Energy isn't a "thing", it's a MEASURE. Of the potential to do work (literally W=F*D). When you have a battery, the mAh count on it is literally a measure of how much work the battery can make electrons in a circuit do while depleting from a charged state to a ground state across the circuit. It's just a measure. At its basest state it's a measure of entropy configurations but I am not going to go into this with you because you are both wrong and too stupid to know the limits of your knowledge.

    Time is measured in terms of radiation oscillations or whatever, but is time tangibly real in the same sense as matter is?

    Time IS a measure. It's another measure of entropy. It is like the difference between when you put a spoonful of creamer on your coffee (time 0) to when the creamer has fully spread out in the coffee. The big bang was a moment of extremely low entropy, the heat death of the universe will be a moment of extremely high entropy. On a QM level, time is just another value that describes a particular state of a wavefunction, and there is no difference between backwards in time and forwards in time, they are just values for different states of the wavefunction. The fact that we experience a flow of time ("forwards") is only due to the fact that for some reason there was a moment of low entropy, the big bang, and some capacity for it to expand into a high entropy system.

    Would you say that time is in a state of "being"? Is the past currently "being"? What about the future?

    I didn't read this before I wrote the above. Time is a measure. It's a name we attach to an experience we have, of events being ordered and sequential. We measure a second for example by a particular number of cycles of an event. The past exists in the sense that it has causal influence on us, as the present state of the universe is caused by the previous state of the universe.

    And about that whole "ability to create a difference" definition… At least you have a definition of some kind, props for that, but by trying to draw these definitional boundaries, it only raises further questions.


    Yeah no shit. I'm doing all the legwork here while you're just asking retarded uninformed questions. I'm guessing your energy is zero because you have zero potential to do any work. These are all questions that have well defined answers and I'm just having to spoon feed them to you. Go read a book first.

    I mean, does time even "create a difference"? How do you define that difference?

    See above.

    Atoms decay.

    Cells die.

    Etc.

    But your definition only raises more questions about what exactly counts as "difference".

    You not knowing something doesn't mean "we" don't know that thing, it usually just means you're just massively ignorant.
  6. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by GAAAAALM

    What a fucking retard. Can't wait till you kick the bucket. Shouldn't be long with your age and health.

    He is a security guard, hopefully a fake criminal will fake copkill him.
  7. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by gadzooks But we have to define boundaries on which particular ontological entities can possess the attribute of "being".

    The question is driving more at what a good definition could be than an actual definitive answer. Don't just ask me to do all the work for you.

    My personal definition would be something informational, for example "a difference that makes a difference". Something exists if it has some causal connection to something else. And what has a causal connection to something else, exists.

    The scientific community draws a distinction between matter, energy, and time, and only matter "exists". But what of energy? And what of time? And what of physically unverifiable phenomena in general? Etc."

    What do you mean "only matter 'exists'"? We have perfectly good definitions of time and energy.

    Energy is the potential to do work. That's it. You take a ball, give it kinetic energy to raise it and put it on a shelf. At that point, it has gravitational potential energy. You drop it, it will lose that GPE as it is turned into kinetic energy.

    Time is defined by a set number of oscillations of a caesium atom.

    What unverifiable phenomena?
  8. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by Daily If something is eternal, then it contains all possibilities

    Uhhh no that's a complete nonsequitur.

    A universe with just one electron zipping on forever is a perfectly conceivable idea. And it just has one possibility. The equations for the electron don't require any first point, you can extend it into t=-infinity or +infinity with no problem.
  9. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by gadzooks Do you mean physical matter alone, or consciousness?

    The running theory is that physical matter actually came into existence roughly 5 billion years ago.

    What "existed" before that is really anyone's guess.

    Consciousness, on the other hand, according to its own running theories, popped up some couple hundred thousand years ago.

    Whether consciousness is a binary thing (either ya got it or ya don't), or a gradual thing (humans ain't the only motherfuckers rockin that shit), it's generally assumed to have emerged from the intercommunication of lower order biological phenomena a few hundred thousand years ago.

    Now, are these answers satisfactory enough to appease a curious mind?

    Not in the slightest.

    Enter religious thinking stage right.

    Each religion has its own narrative about this very question, but the problem is that none of them are even remotely based on rational reasoning, but rather on that epistemologically tricky little thing we call "faith".

    So, to answer your question, I have no fucking idea. And anybody who claims that they do is selling you pure unadulterated bullshit.

    I mean being at all. Ignoring the fact that there would be no observer to give it meaning.

    It seems plausible that all of existence is a big loop.
  10. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    spacexnigeria.tk
    drugfreeliving.tk
    nudeleaks.tk
    enaiess.tk

    Redirect to NIS. Use these to post on Reddit and shit.
  11. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    Also added nudeleaks.tk
  12. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by Obbe So Philip K. Dick had this theory that time was an illusion and that we were all actually in 50 A.D., and the reason he had written this book, Flow My Tears, was that he had somehow momentarily punctured through this illusion, this veil of time, and what he had seen there was what was going on in the Book of Acts.

    And he was really into Gnosticism, and this idea that this demiurge, or demon, had created this illusion of time to make us forget that Christ was about to return, and the kingdom of God was about to arrive. And that we're all in 50 A.D., and there's someone trying to make us forget that God is imminent. And that's what time is. That's what all of history is. It's just this kind of continuous, you know, daydream, or distraction.

    And so I read that, and I was like, well that's weird. And than that night I had a dream and there was this guy in the dream who was supposed to be a psychic. But I was skeptical. I was like, you know, he's not really a psychic, you know I'm thinking to myself. And then suddenly I start floating, like levitating, up to the ceiling. And as I almost go through the roof, I'm like, "Okay, Mr. Psychic. I believe you. You're a psychic. Put me down please." And I float down, and as my feet touch the ground, the psychic turns into this woman in a green dress. And this woman is Lady Gregory.

    Now Lady Gregory was Yeats' patron, this, you know, Irish person. And though I'd never seen her image, I was just sure that this was the face of Lady Gregory. So we're walking along, and Lady Gregory turns to me and says, "Let me explain to you the nature of the universe. Now Philip K. Dick is right about time, but he's wrong that it's 50 A.D. Actually, there's only one instant, and it's right now, and it's eternity. And it's an instant in which God is posing a question, and that question is basically, 'Do you want to, you know, be one with eternity? Do you want to be in heaven?' And we're all saying, 'No thank you. Not just yet.' And so time is actually just this constant saying 'No' to God's invitation. I mean that's what time is. I mean, and it's no more 50 A.D. than it's two thousand and one. And there's just this one instant, and that's what we're always in."

    And then she tells me that actually this is the narrative of everyone's life. That, you know, behind the phenomenal difference, there is but one story, and that's the story of moving from the "no" to the "yes." All of life is like, "No thank you. No thank you. No thank you." then ultimately it's, "Yes, I give in. Yes, I accept. Yes, I embrace." I mean, that's the journey. I mean, everyone gets to the "yes" in the end, right?

    Waking Life sucks and you are a retard for bringing this into my thread, and again without source.
  13. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny how about start and dont end.

    Sure but only the start or lack thereof is relevant.
  14. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    Do you miss your testicles?
  15. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    I got both domains and pointed them to here

    EDIT: drugfreeliving.tk is working
  16. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by Grylls for?

    Call njggers "inwards" pic
  17. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    To redirect so we can post it on Reddit and shit.
  18. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by Grylls pics?

    $20
  19. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny define 'existence'.

    Any motion of being as opposed to absolute nonbeing.

    define 'begin'.

    "Start"

    define 'eternal'.

    "Didn't start"
  20. Big League Jew Tuskegee Airman
    I registered the domain drugfreeliving.tk and forwarded it to NIS, please set up the connection on your end so we can spread out valuable resource of information
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 36
  6. 37
  7. 38
  8. 39
  9. 40
  10. 41
  11. 42
  12. 43
Jump to Top