User Controls
Posts by Anal Turing
-
2018-10-16 at 3:55 PM UTC in Enough has been said about Kavanaugh to disqualify his appointment
-
2018-10-16 at 3:30 PM UTC in Are we for abortion here?
-
2018-10-16 at 12:09 PM UTC in Are we for abortion here?
-
2018-10-16 at 5:10 AM UTC in Are we for abortion here?
-
2018-10-16 at 3:35 AM UTC in Are we for abortion here?
-
2018-10-16 at 1:42 AM UTC in Enough has been said about Kavanaugh to disqualify his appointment
-
2018-10-16 at 1:07 AM UTC in Enough has been said about Kavanaugh to disqualify his appointment
Originally posted by infinityshock then some obscure whore can make up any accusations she wants to derail such a significant appointment.
no.
Yeah 6 years ago, during the reign of Barack "Prog Negus" Obama, she already launched this 6000 IQ xanatos gambit for when he would be nominated in the future.
There were 25 names on the shortlist, including a woman who was at the top of the list, all of whom were hand picked by the republican party and were so evenly matched for the appointment that the person in charge of drafting the list said "you could throw a dart at it". CBF's allegation also came when Kavanaugh was shortlisted and not nominated. Why this particular guy? Would the dems have thrown lesbian rape allegations at them if the Reps nominated Amy Coney Barrett or Allison Eve were nominated?think about it. high school. high school is irrelevant to anything. even evoking high school should be grounds for dismissal of any accusations. after all that bullshit i literally would still vote for his appointment if one of the pound-me-too whores claimed he fisted her asshole like a juicy sock puppet.
I don't know if you believe in god or some kind of magical human spirit that acausally makes your decisions, but who he used to be is very much a part of who he is, and throughout the course of the hearing (whether you care about CBF or not) has proven himself to be a dumb asshole. -
2018-10-16 at 12:54 AM UTC in Enough has been said about Kavanaugh to disqualify his appointment
Originally posted by Jυicebox I consider myself an experienced degenerate and I don't know what a devil's triangle is
Are you saying we should disqualify someone for a job because they drank heavily in college? Because everybody does that.
Well no, that would be an excessively reductionist view, as you are destined to hold. The big picture painted for Kavanaugh is of a man of poor moral character.As for boofing, who knows whether he was telling the truth or not? Maybe they called it something else?
Lol. He didn't say "this is what I thought at the time", he literally asserted that that is what he now specifically believed it meant that then.He himself said "Roe vs. Wade" is the law. I don't think it could be overturned even if he wanted to. I guess they could effectively overturn it by passing a law that says "no abortions past 2 weeks" or whatever
Roe v Wade is an SCJ decision, not a law. If the decision is overturned, it is no longer a precedent. It also stands on somewhat tenuous legal ground as a constitutional judgment. In some ways, even liberals might want to overturn Roe v Wade (so there can be a stronger and better founded law or ruling that focuses on bodily autonomy rather than Roe v Wade, which ultimately came down to whether or not the state can tell a doctor how to practice).The rape accusations should not even be considered. The opposing side always accuses anyone they don't like of sexual assault (which is a real shame because by the time this is over, nobody will believe anyone claiming to have been sexually assaulted whether they're telling the truth or not)
Again, not a criminal case and a much stronger case than simply "he said she said". Although it is definitely squirrelly, but there is at least partial truth to elements of the accusation.That said, I don't want a PATRIOT act supporter on the supreme court but I'm clearly the only one on the planet that gives a fuck about that, and, well, we're at the "lesser of two evils" crossroads again
I definitely worry about the future of privacy in the USA but I wouldn't even care if his appointment wasn't utterly and completely, singlemindedly politically motivated towards a singular goal. The entire criteria for the shortlist he was on was "who will probably overturn Roe v Wade?" -
2018-10-16 at 12:18 AM UTC in Enough has been said about Kavanaugh to disqualify his appointment
Originally posted by infinityshock this is why the court system and trials exist…and why trial by public, isnt.
Again, this is not a criminal trial: the purpose is to assess Kavanaugh's moral character and fitness for the job of being an SCJ for life, or till he steps down. I would actually rather have Kavanaugh than Scalia policy wise, by far, but Scalia was far more fit for the office. Kavanaugh is a weak chinned faggot.youre one of the untermensch proles that arent capable of forming a coherent thought process without being told what it should be.
If you really think Kavanaugh was such a fucking legend in high school (as he claims) and simultaneously didn't know what boofing was or what a Devil's Triangle was, either you were lame as fuck at 16 or are currently an idiot. -
2018-10-16 at 12:08 AM UTC in Enough has been said about Kavanaugh to disqualify his appointment
Originally posted by infinityshock im not seeing any evidence proving he lied.
not real evidence…because those fucktards from 34 years ago who claim they witnessed him 'blackout drunk…theres no way he could remember anything' is not admissible evidence. im still waiting for an answer on how they know 'theres no way he could remember anything.'
I mean, what sort of evidence do you want for his behaviour? His own personal yearbook page says "100 kegs or bust" and he characterized himself as a big drinker during his school years, and multiple witnesses have said as much. The alt facts version is that he was a big fan of beer, partying, getting shit faced, but never got blackout drunk. He is the absolute least credible witness with regards to his drinking; the act itself renders him worse at remembering it.
Again, this isn't a criminal case: he isn't going to jail and we aren't applying the criminal standard. -
2018-10-15 at 11:12 PM UTC in Microsoft Co-Founder Paul Allen Dead (Video)I bet they identified the body from his unmistakeably impeccable business card.
-
2018-10-15 at 9:19 PM UTC in Are we for abortion here?As demonstrated above, the idea that your identity ends where your memory does, is internally inconsistent and self contradictory. As such, it makes no sense: to assume such a proposition as true would be to assume it as false as well. Even if you change the parameters to avoid this identity, you are simply going to defeat the idea by... not actually making any argument for identity.
-
2018-10-15 at 9:14 PM UTC in Enough has been said about Kavanaugh to disqualify his appointment
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING 2.0 - The GMO Reckoning You're right op, and you came to the right place. I'll make some phone calls and get this drunken Irishman dismissed.
It's more that I've seen some really retarded arguments here that have zero relevance to the actual situation at hand, i.e. his SCOTUS appointment. -
2018-10-15 at 9:10 PM UTC in Are we for abortion here?Simple example: your statement posits that "you" did in fact exist as far back as your memory goes.
If the version of you that corresponds to your earliest memory is a valid version of "you", then it logically follows that their earliest memory of themselves is also a valid version of "them", and by extension (because you are literally making an identity claim), a valid version of you.
We can just daisy chain the same definition together until there is no break in continuity, down to whatever causal chain can be said to inform your memory and biological pre-memory processes that ended up informing your memory, all the way back to the big bang. So you haven't solved shit with this approach.
Then if you want to hang on to memory theory, you need to draw a semantic line somewhere to separate memory from simple syntactical causation (like a chain of dominoes), and good luck with that. -
2018-10-15 at 9:04 PM UTC in Are we for abortion here?
-
2018-10-15 at 5:07 PM UTC in I hate pakistanThe entire subcontinent should be carpet bombed, then refashioned for the purpose of growing marijuana.
-
2018-10-15 at 5:04 PM UTC in Enough has been said about Kavanaugh to disqualify his appointment
Originally posted by infinityshock you're full of shit.
a potential liar with zero evidence is making claims that may or may not be true.
it's just as likely that broad has a twig up her ass and is getting revenge on him for some unknown reason. maybe he didn't let her cheat off him on a test in college.
Whether or not she got raped by him is irrelevant for the supreme court appointment.
Of course he shouldn't be thrown into jail, but this isn't a criminal case. In the course of defending himself, he has clearly lied, for example regarding his binge drinking or the kinds of parties he attending. More importantly, he also lied about things like his role in the nomination of William Pryor, or his knowledge about the Manuel Miranda case.
An appointed supreme court judge shouldn't be trying to politick on points like this, it simply confirms that he has an inherent political agenda behind pursuing or defending this appointment(and it's true: the objective is blatantly to overturn Roe v Wade), when a judge should face this type of point purely pragmatically/factually and explain it in judicial terms, as Scalia did, rather than trying to lie about it.
An SCJ should not be a demonstrable liar, specially for political ends. -
2018-10-15 at 4:53 PM UTC in Enough has been said about Kavanaugh to disqualify his appointment
Originally posted by HTS Being wrong on the stand isn't perjury. If he's just out of touch, that's fine.🤔
Either he is completely ignorant and actually thinks boofing is farting or a liar. Take your pick. No man should be appointed a supreme court justice with this level of incompetence, specially when half his biography is about how crunk he got as a kid. -
2018-10-15 at 4:30 PM UTC in Are we for abortion here?Abortion is definitely a moral negative in almost any ethical system that starts from the (practically inarguable) basis of individual rights and liberties.
It's just also a fact that from that perspective, we have to weigh up (for example) the moral claim of an inarguably morally considerable individual over their own body, which almost always takes precedence over the right to life of an arguably considerable fetus.
You also need to look at it pragmatically, to account for the realities of people acting within your society, morals or not: abortions are always going to happen, you cannot ever enforceably regulate them because ultimately people are always going to put the legal consideration second to their personal moral and pragmatic considerations, and they can do it at home with a coathanger. This is why you have to view it as a public health issue, if you want to cut down on abortions and stop the moral I'll, it needs to be through family planning and sex education so unwanted pregnancies don't happen, and if they do, then the parent should be amply informed about alternatives to abortion, including adoption, or if they opt to go with abortion, then they should have a safe, regulated avenue for it. -
2018-10-15 at 3:48 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meatBump for more morals and ethics discussions.
