User Controls
Enough has been said about Kavanaugh to disqualify his appointment
-
2018-10-15 at 3:41 PM UTCAs a justice of the supreme court. Whether or not things happened as CBF said, enough has been demonstrated in the course of contesting her claims, to say that Kavanaugh is not fit for the position, which is one of the most consequential and importantly positions of power in the USA and, by extension, the world.
This is including but not limited to his own multiple, demonstrable instances of perjury during the process, for example lying about what boofing means. Either he is so hopelessly incompetent and out of touch that he doesn't know what boofing actually means, or telling a bald faced, transparent lie about it meaning flatulence.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-10-15 at 3:59 PM UTC
Originally posted by Anal Turing This is including but not limited to his own multiple, demonstrable instances of perjury during the process, for example lying about what boofing means. Either he is so hopelessly incompetent and out of touch that he doesn't know what boofing actually means, or telling a bald faced, transparent lie about it meaning flatulence.
Being wrong on the stand isn't perjury. If he's just out of touch, that's fine.🤔 -
2018-10-15 at 4:05 PM UTC
Originally posted by Anal Turing As a justice of the supreme court. Whether or not things happened as CBF said, enough has been demonstrated in the course of contesting her claims, to say that Kavanaugh is not fit for the position, which is one of the most consequential and importantly positions of power in the USA and, by extension, the world.
This is including but not limited to his own multiple, demonstrable instances of perjury during the process, for example lying about what boofing means. Either he is so hopelessly incompetent and out of touch that he doesn't know what boofing actually means, or telling a bald faced, transparent lie about it meaning flatulence.
you're full of shit.
a potential liar with zero evidence is making claims that may or may not be true.
it's just as likely that broad has a twig up her ass and is getting revenge on him for some unknown reason. maybe he didn't let her cheat off him on a test in college. -
2018-10-15 at 4:42 PM UTCThis dumb shit still? Shut upThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-10-15 at 4:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by HTS Being wrong on the stand isn't perjury. If he's just out of touch, that's fine.🤔
Either he is completely ignorant and actually thinks boofing is farting or a liar. Take your pick. No man should be appointed a supreme court justice with this level of incompetence, specially when half his biography is about how crunk he got as a kid. -
2018-10-15 at 5:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock you're full of shit.
a potential liar with zero evidence is making claims that may or may not be true.
it's just as likely that broad has a twig up her ass and is getting revenge on him for some unknown reason. maybe he didn't let her cheat off him on a test in college.
Whether or not she got raped by him is irrelevant for the supreme court appointment.
Of course he shouldn't be thrown into jail, but this isn't a criminal case. In the course of defending himself, he has clearly lied, for example regarding his binge drinking or the kinds of parties he attending. More importantly, he also lied about things like his role in the nomination of William Pryor, or his knowledge about the Manuel Miranda case.
An appointed supreme court judge shouldn't be trying to politick on points like this, it simply confirms that he has an inherent political agenda behind pursuing or defending this appointment(and it's true: the objective is blatantly to overturn Roe v Wade), when a judge should face this type of point purely pragmatically/factually and explain it in judicial terms, as Scalia did, rather than trying to lie about it.
An SCJ should not be a demonstrable liar, specially for political ends. -
2018-10-15 at 5:07 PM UTCYou're right op, and you came to the right place. I'll make some phone calls and get this drunken Irishman dismissed.
-
2018-10-15 at 7:19 PM UTCHe ain't right.
He's a snot nose. -
2018-10-15 at 9:14 PM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING 2.0 - The GMO Reckoning You're right op, and you came to the right place. I'll make some phone calls and get this drunken Irishman dismissed.
It's more that I've seen some really retarded arguments here that have zero relevance to the actual situation at hand, i.e. his SCOTUS appointment. -
2018-10-15 at 9:23 PM UTCHe's also a GIRLS VOLLEYBALL COACH the creepiest job you can have as an adult.
Fuck him. There are way better judges out there and questions still remain. America is so fucking stupid it's pathetic. You are dumbing yourselves down by believing your shit and picking partisan sides that both want to rule you like a slave.
Nobody has any illusions about America being the land of the free and home of the brave anymore. You faggots will clamor to have your freedoms stripped and take it like a bitch when they want more.
Not my cucktryThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-10-15 at 9:49 PM UTC
Originally posted by Anal Turing Whether or not she got raped by him is irrelevant for the supreme court appointment.
Of course he shouldn't be thrown into jail, but this isn't a criminal case. In the course of defending himself, he has clearly lied, for example regarding his binge drinking or the kinds of parties he attending. More importantly, he also lied about things like his role in the nomination of William Pryor, or his knowledge about the Manuel Miranda case.
An appointed supreme court judge shouldn't be trying to politick on points like this, it simply confirms that he has an inherent political agenda behind pursuing or defending this appointment(and it's true: the objective is blatantly to overturn Roe v Wade), when a judge should face this type of point purely pragmatically/factually and explain it in judicial terms, as Scalia did, rather than trying to lie about it.
An SCJ should not be a demonstrable liar, specially for political ends.
im not seeing any evidence proving he lied.
not real evidence...because those fucktards from 34 years ago who claim they witnessed him 'blackout drunk...theres no way he could remember anything' is not admissible evidence. im still waiting for an answer on how they know 'theres no way he could remember anything.' -
2018-10-15 at 9:51 PM UTC
Originally posted by Sudo He's also a GIRLS VOLLEYBALL COACH the creepiest job you can have as an adult.
Fuck him. There are way better judges out there and questions still remain. America is so fucking stupid it's pathetic. You are dumbing yourselves down by believing your shit and picking partisan sides that both want to rule you like a slave.
Nobody has any illusions about America being the land of the free and home of the brave anymore. You faggots will clamor to have your freedoms stripped and take it like a bitch when they want more.
Not my cucktry
regardless of accusations, im at the point i prefer his appointment for no other reason than to shit on the bitches who started this whole scandal in the first place by giving any credence whatsoever to that slag ford and her baseless accusations. there is literally zero evidence corroborating a single thing she said. -
2018-10-15 at 10:05 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock regardless of accusations, im at the point i prefer his appointment for no other reason than to shit on the bitches who started this whole scandal in the first place by giving any credence whatsoever to that slag ford and her baseless accusations. there is literally zero evidence corroborating a single thing she said.
This. It's all bullshit. -
2018-10-16 at 12:08 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock im not seeing any evidence proving he lied.
not real evidence…because those fucktards from 34 years ago who claim they witnessed him 'blackout drunk…theres no way he could remember anything' is not admissible evidence. im still waiting for an answer on how they know 'theres no way he could remember anything.'
I mean, what sort of evidence do you want for his behaviour? His own personal yearbook page says "100 kegs or bust" and he characterized himself as a big drinker during his school years, and multiple witnesses have said as much. The alt facts version is that he was a big fan of beer, partying, getting shit faced, but never got blackout drunk. He is the absolute least credible witness with regards to his drinking; the act itself renders him worse at remembering it.
Again, this isn't a criminal case: he isn't going to jail and we aren't applying the criminal standard. -
2018-10-16 at 12:12 AM UTC
Originally posted by Anal Turing I mean, what sort of evidence do you want for his behaviour? His own personal yearbook page says "100 kegs or bust" and he characterized himself as a big drinker during his school years, and multiple witnesses have said as much. He is the absolute least credible witness with regards to his drinking; the act itself renders him worse at remembering it.
this is why the court system and trials exist...and why trial by public, isnt.
youre one of the untermensch proles that arent capable of forming a coherent thought process without being told what it should be. -
2018-10-16 at 12:18 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock this is why the court system and trials exist…and why trial by public, isnt.
Again, this is not a criminal trial: the purpose is to assess Kavanaugh's moral character and fitness for the job of being an SCJ for life, or till he steps down. I would actually rather have Kavanaugh than Scalia policy wise, by far, but Scalia was far more fit for the office. Kavanaugh is a weak chinned faggot.youre one of the untermensch proles that arent capable of forming a coherent thought process without being told what it should be.
If you really think Kavanaugh was such a fucking legend in high school (as he claims) and simultaneously didn't know what boofing was or what a Devil's Triangle was, either you were lame as fuck at 16 or are currently an idiot. -
2018-10-16 at 12:29 AM UTC
-
2018-10-16 at 12:33 AM UTCI consider myself an experienced degenerate and I don't know what a devil's triangle is
Are you saying we should disqualify someone for a job because they drank heavily in college? Because everybody does that. As for boofing, who knows whether he was telling the truth or not? Maybe they called it something else?
He himself said "Roe vs. Wade" is the law. I don't think it could be overturned even if he wanted to. I guess they could effectively overturn it by passing a law that says "no abortions past 2 weeks" or whatever
The rape accusations should not even be considered. The opposing side always accuses anyone they don't like of sexual assault (which is a real shame because by the time this is over, nobody will believe anyone claiming to have been sexually assaulted whether they're telling the truth or not)
That said, I don't want a PATRIOT act supporter on the supreme court but I'm clearly the only one on the planet that gives a fuck about that, and, well, we're at the "lesser of two evils" crossroads again -
2018-10-16 at 12:40 AM UTCDamn this shit, you can't go clean under your toenails or something? This shit is done and done and DONE!
-
2018-10-16 at 12:42 AM UTC
Originally posted by Anal Turing Again, this is not a criminal trial: the purpose is to assess Kavanaugh's moral character and fitness for the job of being an SCJ for life, or till he steps down. I would actually rather have Kavanaugh than Scalia policy wise, by far, but Scalia was far more fit for the office. Kavanaugh is a weak chinned faggot.
If you really think Kavanaugh was such a fucking legend in high school (as he claims) and simultaneously didn't know what boofing was or what a Devil's Triangle was, either you were lame as fuck at 16 or are currently an idiot.
then some obscure whore can make up any accusations she wants to derail such a significant appointment.
no.
think about it. high school. high school is irrelevant to anything. even evoking high school should be grounds for dismissal of any accusations. after all that bullshit i literally would still vote for his appointment if one of the pound-me-too whores claimed he fisted her asshole like a juicy sock puppet.
