User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 69
  6. 70
  7. 71
  8. 72

Posts That Were Thanked by vindicktive vinny

  1. ner vegas African Astronaut
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  2. ner vegas African Astronaut
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny ok, lets try this one more time.

    out of 10 men you interacted with, how many of them actually tried to cut you off to one-up you in some retarded ways.

    ok, go back to your remedial ESL class:

    men usually try to cut you off to one-up you in some retarded way, women do it just because something else popped into their heads and they can't just wait.

    the reason that men usually cut you off is to one up you, the reason women normally do it is because they think of something else and can't stand to shut up for a moment before changing the subject. it has nothing to do with how common being interrupted is.

    last time I'm responding to you on this.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  3. Ghost Black Hole

    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  4. Warcry Space Nigga
    Originally posted by RIPtotse I am not mad about that I am glad and I support those laws. Your so fucking stupid you can't even see that and that's why you got deported. Get your house robbed by mephredrome addicted teenagers and Jack off in bar bathrooms more why don't you.

    Triggered you basically admitted I was right. Your mad I don’t or didn’t have to do parole and am in a place with a lower age of consent.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. ner vegas African Astronaut


    https://twitter.com/BecauseMiami/status/1748230327804301449
    https://www.flightaware.com/live/flight/GTI95/history/20240119/0200Z/KMIA/TJSJ

    did a U-turn
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  6. Donald Trump Black Hole
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  7. Instigator Space Nigga [the staring tame crusher]
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  8. infinityshock Black Hole
    Originally posted by aldra

    Boy...that sure escalated quickly
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  9. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  10. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    was scheduled for 6pm Beirut (1hr 15mins from now) but some people are saying it's delayed due to the two attacks, so I'm not sure
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  11. Instigator Space Nigga [the staring tame crusher]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny ya but why does it have to be a chip.

    This idiom traces its roots back to a custom that was known in North America since the early 19th century. The New York newspaper Long Island Telegraph reported on 20 May 1830 "when two churlish boys were determined to fight, a chip [of wood] would be placed on the shoulder of one, and the other demanded to knock it off at his peril". A similar notion is mentioned in the issue of the Onondaga Standard of Syracuse, New York on 8 December 1830: "'He waylay me', said I, 'the mean sneaking fellow—I am only afraid that he will sue me for damages. Oh! if I only could get him to knock a chip off my shoulder, and so get round the law, I would give him one of the soundest thrashings he ever had'."
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  12. infinityshock Black Hole
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ We need some racism against whiteys to balance things out.

    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  13. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by aldra this is interesting because it was supposedly struck something like 700km away from Yemeni borders, and news articles are being deliberately vague about the vessel itself. it's apparently a Liberia-flagged chemical tanker that was making the journey from Saudi Arabia to India, and it's a pain in the dick trying to work out the actual vessel without paying for a marine tracking service.

    best guess at the moment: it may have been the Africa, IMO 9905320.

    either someone launched a drone attack from a ship rather than a ground base or this is some kind of accident or false flag they're using to try to scare people into joining Operation Prostate Goblin.

    OK. actual info.

    The ship in question is most likely the SUGAR, IMO 9251547. As per VesselFinder, its last stop was Jeddah Anchorage, Saudi Arabia and was headed to Krishnapatnam, India and appears to be delayed.

    It was hard to track down information on the ship, but as it turns out there's a relatively open database related to insurance risk that lists the current operator of a ship if you have its name/IMO - https://www.marinerating.com/ships/9251547/SUGAR.

    According to this database it's operated by IMS S.A. which sent me down a bunch of dead ends because there are like 20 different shipping companies with some variant of that name, International Maritime Services, International Marine Shipping etc., none of which have coherent websites or list their inventory.

    After a bunch of searches I found that this particular company is associated with Castus Enterprises, which is a Greek company with the same address as a small company called IMS S.A., neither of which appear to be listed openly but show up on Google Maps (link). Street View is timestamped 2023 and the building appears to be vacant or abandoned.

    Digging into this company we find that it's registered to a man named Georgios Gialozoglou - you'll find a lot of interesting things in his name if you search it up.

    Specifically, he's been involved with running 'dark fleets' transferring oil between Iran and Venezuela and has shown up on US watchlists and direct sanctions. He also appears to have been involved in the Black Sea 'grain deal' but it's not clear to what extent. (link, link)


    In short, it does not appear that the ship that was struck by a drone was affiliated with israeli interests whatsoever, in fact it's quite the opposite. It seems that the israelis, or a proxy acting on their behalf, attacked a ship affiliated with Iranian interests and are trying to paint it as another Houthi attack.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  14. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny arrr, thr phalse jéw dickhotomy.

    i liek it.

    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  15. Donald Trump Black Hole
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny looks like soviet-afghan era footage

    On 13 May 2016, PKK militants shot down a Turkish Army Bell AH-1W SuperCobra attack helicopter using 9K38 Igla (SA-18 Grouse) version of this missile system. The missile severed the tail section from the rest of the helicopter, causing it to fragment in midair and crash, killing the two pilots on board. The Turkish government first claimed that it fell due to technical failure before it became clear that it was shot down. The PKK later released video footage of the rocket being fired and striking the helicopter.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9K38_Igla
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  16. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by aldra today I saw a video of some guy who rubber banded his dick and then hit it with what looked like an angle grinder

    did not like

    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  17. Originally posted by Wariat In traditional societies, the age of consent for a sexual union was a matter for the family to decide, or a tribal custom. In most cases, this coincided with signs of puberty, menstruation for a woman, and pubic hair for a man.[3]

    Reliable data for ages at marriage is scarce. In England, for example, the only reliable data in the early modern period comes from property records made after death. Not only were the records relatively rare, but not all bothered to record the participants' ages, and it seems that the more complete the records are, the more likely they are to reveal young marriages. Modern historians have sometimes shown reluctance to accept evidence of young ages of marriage, dismissing it as a 'misreading' by a later copier of the records.[3]

    In the 12th century, Gratian, the influential compiler of canon law in medieval Europe, accepted the age of puberty for marriage to be around twelve for girls and around fourteen for boys but acknowledged consent to be meaningful if both children were older than seven years of age.[4] There were authorities that said that such consent for entering marriage could take place earlier. Marriage would then be valid as long as neither of the two parties annulled the marital agreement before reaching puberty, or if they had already consummated the marriage. Judges sometimes honored marriages based on mutual consent at ages younger than seven: in contrast to established canon, there are recorded marriages of two- and three-year-olds.[3]

    In China, 慶元條法事類 (Law Code of the Qingyuan Reign), published in 1202 which catelogued laws that came into effect from 1127 to 1195, introduced statutory rape in the following decree '諸強姦者,女十歲以下雖和也同,流三千里,配遠惡州;未成,配五百里;折傷者,絞。 [5] Successful intercourse with girls younger than 10 is considered rape in all circumstances, punishable by exile 3000 li (miles) away into the uncivilized provinces; if the rape was unsuccessful, exile by 500 li; If injury occurs in process, death by hanging'.

    From 1275 in England; as part of its provisions on rape, the Statute of Westminster 1275 made it a misdemeanor to "ravish" a "maiden within age," whether with or without her consent. The phrase "within age" was later interpreted by jurist Sir Edward Coke (England, 17th century) as meaning the age of marriage, which at the time was twelve years of age.[6]

    大明律·集解附例卷之二十五·刑律·犯姦, (Great Ming Code, 25th section, Criminal Code on Rape) came into effect from 1373, raised the age of consent to 12 by stating '十二歲以下幼女未有欲心故雖和同強論成姦者亦坐絞罪。 [7] Girls younger than 12 lack rational sexual desires, therefore any intercourse with them is considered the same as rape and therefore punishable by death with hanging.'



    Originally posted by Wariat "From 1275 in England; as part of its provisions on rape, the Statute of Westminster 1275 made it a misdemeanor to "ravish" a "maiden within age," whether with or without her consent. The phrase "within age" was later interpreted by jurist Sir Edward Coke (England, 17th century) as meaning the age of marriage, which at the time was twelve years of age.[6]"

    finy there ya go. nuff said. id be fine. id be guilty of a bunch of misdemeanors i guess…



    Originally posted by Wariat plus y dick doesnt get hard often anmore and im or einto oral stuff i may not have been guilkty of anything back then finny.



    Originally posted by Wariat everyone agreed on 12 being the baseline age at the time even asians fuys:

    "大明律·集解附例卷之二十五·刑律·犯姦, (Great Ming Code, 25th section, Criminal Code on Rape) came into effect from 1373, raised the age of consent to 12 by stating '十二歲以下幼女未有欲心故雖和同強論成姦者亦坐絞罪。 [7] Girls younger than 12 lack rational sexual desires, therefore any intercourse with them is considered the same as rape and therefore punishable by death with hanging.'"



    Originally posted by Wariat the ming code even admitted girls 12 have sexual desire by stating those under do not have them in the raitonal sense guys. in the rational sense.



    Originally posted by Wariat i would disagree with this though but maybe it is the modern world we live in. I heard of what goes on omegle for instance jsut heard guys. i mean some below this do have the curuiosity or desire at least nowadays form "what I heard" but lso i know for a fact soe this age also do not. so its a wobbler guys. 12 is a wobbler. right scron?



    Originally posted by Wariat "The American colonies followed the English tradition, and the law was more of a guide. For example, Mary Hathaway (Virginia, 1689) was only nine when she was married to William Williams.[8] Sir Edward Coke "made it clear that the marriage of girls under 12 was normal, and the age at which a girl who was a wife was eligible for a dower from her husband's estate was 9 even though her husband be only four years old."[3]

    In the 16th century, a small number of Italian and German states set the minimum age for sexual intercourse for girls, setting it at twelve years. Towards the end of the 18th century, other European countries also began to enact similar laws. The first French Constitution of 1791 established the minimum age at eleven years. Portugal, Spain, Denmark and the Swiss cantons initially set the minimum age at ten to twelve years.[6]

    Age of consent laws were historically difficult to follow and enforce. Legal norms based on age were not, in general, common until the 19th century, because clear proof of exact age and precise date of birth were often unavailable.[6]

    In 18th century Australia it was thought that children were inherently sinful and vulnerable to sexual temptations. Punishment for "giving in" to these temptations was generally left to parents and was not seen as a government matter, except in the case of rape.[9] Australian children had few rights and were legally considered the chattel of their parents.[9] From the late 18th century, and especially in the 19th century, attitudes started to change. By the mid-19th century there was increased concern over child sexual abuse.[9]"



    Originally posted by Wariat finny explain it. it says toward end of 1700s european states started enacting ages of consent laws and even then it was 12 or so. show me proof people were killed by girls fmaileis for rpaing or fucking when those laws werent in effect?



    Originally posted by Wariat what fucking rpoof do you have retard besides you wish it were so> you and your homosexual friend here turd temple?

    Nigga wrote a book report on fucking kids
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  18. Wariat Marine/Preteen Biologist
    In traditional societies, the age of consent for a sexual union was a matter for the family to decide, or a tribal custom. In most cases, this coincided with signs of puberty, menstruation for a woman, and pubic hair for a man.[3]

    Reliable data for ages at marriage is scarce. In England, for example, the only reliable data in the early modern period comes from property records made after death. Not only were the records relatively rare, but not all bothered to record the participants' ages, and it seems that the more complete the records are, the more likely they are to reveal young marriages. Modern historians have sometimes shown reluctance to accept evidence of young ages of marriage, dismissing it as a 'misreading' by a later copier of the records.[3]

    In the 12th century, Gratian, the influential compiler of canon law in medieval Europe, accepted the age of puberty for marriage to be around twelve for girls and around fourteen for boys but acknowledged consent to be meaningful if both children were older than seven years of age.[4] There were authorities that said that such consent for entering marriage could take place earlier. Marriage would then be valid as long as neither of the two parties annulled the marital agreement before reaching puberty, or if they had already consummated the marriage. Judges sometimes honored marriages based on mutual consent at ages younger than seven: in contrast to established canon, there are recorded marriages of two- and three-year-olds.[3]

    In China, 慶元條法事類 (Law Code of the Qingyuan Reign), published in 1202 which catelogued laws that came into effect from 1127 to 1195, introduced statutory rape in the following decree '諸強姦者,女十歲以下雖和也同,流三千里,配遠惡州;未成,配五百里;折傷者,絞。 [5] Successful intercourse with girls younger than 10 is considered rape in all circumstances, punishable by exile 3000 li (miles) away into the uncivilized provinces; if the rape was unsuccessful, exile by 500 li; If injury occurs in process, death by hanging'.

    From 1275 in England; as part of its provisions on rape, the Statute of Westminster 1275 made it a misdemeanor to "ravish" a "maiden within age," whether with or without her consent. The phrase "within age" was later interpreted by jurist Sir Edward Coke (England, 17th century) as meaning the age of marriage, which at the time was twelve years of age.[6]

    大明律·集解附例卷之二十五·刑律·犯姦, (Great Ming Code, 25th section, Criminal Code on Rape) came into effect from 1373, raised the age of consent to 12 by stating '十二歲以下幼女未有欲心故雖和同強論成姦者亦坐絞罪。 [7] Girls younger than 12 lack rational sexual desires, therefore any intercourse with them is considered the same as rape and therefore punishable by death with hanging.'
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  19. Donald Trump Black Hole
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  20. infinityshock Black Hole
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker You were boring ten years ago. Now you are just a bottom tier cringe fat ass has been.

    But please bore us with yet another gay reference…

    i will staple your balls to a one horse open sleigh, bore my cock into your bottom, oe'r the fields we go. youll be cringing all the way. spanking your fat ass bright. oh what fun it is to make you gay tonight.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 69
  6. 70
  7. 71
  8. 72
Jump to Top