User Controls
Move the fucking ass
-
2023-12-14 at 7:04 PM UTCi pretty sutpid a lot of things bro?
-
2023-12-14 at 7:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by Third Temple Im pretty sure there is a 4-5 year spread rule in most J'ewish or Christian cults that see that as OK. an 18 year old with a 13-14 year old is accepted if she brings home the guy and the parents say Its cool. its not Legal in most areas but it's cool with them
I'v heard some weird shit where in the J'ewish faith (and maybe some Christian groups) that she can blow a guy and off the table take it in the ass but not vaginal sex until she's married. thats fucking weird. at least anal.
Not true at all. The most devout abrahamics consider anal a sin. Anything other than reproduction sex is a sin -
2023-12-14 at 7:05 PM UTC
-
2023-12-14 at 7:22 PM UTC
-
2023-12-14 at 7:22 PM UTCeducate urself.
-
2023-12-14 at 7:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat Dude your a retard almost all of humanity it was accepted about 13 read about Victorian England as long as she had a period retard. Fuck your modern USA timeline shit.
well Men lived to be 40ish and Women 35
but people would say you "Robbed the Cradle" if you were some old dude like Wariat in those days. they wouldn't let that "spread" in years down. the rule half plus 7 years .. so a 18 year old = 9 plus 7 so 16 year old 'women' for 18 year old man -
2023-12-14 at 7:23 PM UTCIn traditional societies, the age of consent for a sexual union was a matter for the family to decide, or a tribal custom. In most cases, this coincided with signs of puberty, menstruation for a woman, and pubic hair for a man.[3]
Reliable data for ages at marriage is scarce. In England, for example, the only reliable data in the early modern period comes from property records made after death. Not only were the records relatively rare, but not all bothered to record the participants' ages, and it seems that the more complete the records are, the more likely they are to reveal young marriages. Modern historians have sometimes shown reluctance to accept evidence of young ages of marriage, dismissing it as a 'misreading' by a later copier of the records.[3]
In the 12th century, Gratian, the influential compiler of canon law in medieval Europe, accepted the age of puberty for marriage to be around twelve for girls and around fourteen for boys but acknowledged consent to be meaningful if both children were older than seven years of age.[4] There were authorities that said that such consent for entering marriage could take place earlier. Marriage would then be valid as long as neither of the two parties annulled the marital agreement before reaching puberty, or if they had already consummated the marriage. Judges sometimes honored marriages based on mutual consent at ages younger than seven: in contrast to established canon, there are recorded marriages of two- and three-year-olds.[3]
In China, 慶元條法事類 (Law Code of the Qingyuan Reign), published in 1202 which catelogued laws that came into effect from 1127 to 1195, introduced statutory rape in the following decree '諸強姦者，女十歲以下雖和也同，流三千里，配遠惡州；未成，配五百里；折傷者，絞。 [5] Successful intercourse with girls younger than 10 is considered rape in all circumstances, punishable by exile 3000 li (miles) away into the uncivilized provinces; if the rape was unsuccessful, exile by 500 li; If injury occurs in process, death by hanging'.
From 1275 in England; as part of its provisions on rape, the Statute of Westminster 1275 made it a misdemeanor to "ravish" a "maiden within age," whether with or without her consent. The phrase "within age" was later interpreted by jurist Sir Edward Coke (England, 17th century) as meaning the age of marriage, which at the time was twelve years of age.[6]
大明律·集解附例卷之二十五·刑律·犯姦, (Great Ming Code, 25th section, Criminal Code on Rape) came into effect from 1373, raised the age of consent to 12 by stating '十二歲以下幼女未有欲心故雖和同強論成姦者亦坐絞罪。 [7] Girls younger than 12 lack rational sexual desires, therefore any intercourse with them is considered the same as rape and therefore punishable by death with hanging.'The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2023-12-14 at 7:31 PM UTCSHUT THE FUCK UP. dude get a fifth of J.D. and a bottle of Barbiturates, put on some Nike (purple stripe) get comfy.
lay a sheet over your head. wait for the tunnel vision and white light. they'll take you by your hand. -
2023-12-14 at 7:32 PM UTCshow me first man.
-
2023-12-14 at 7:35 PM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat In traditional societies, the age of consent for a sexual union was a matter for the family to decide, or a tribal custom. In most cases, this coincided with signs of puberty, menstruation for a woman, and pubic hair for a man.[3]
Reliable data for ages at marriage is scarce. In England, for example, the only reliable data in the early modern period comes from property records made after death. Not only were the records relatively rare, but not all bothered to record the participants' ages, and it seems that the more complete the records are, the more likely they are to reveal young marriages. Modern historians have sometimes shown reluctance to accept evidence of young ages of marriage, dismissing it as a 'misreading' by a later copier of the records.[3]
In the 12th century, Gratian, the influential compiler of canon law in medieval Europe, accepted the age of puberty for marriage to be around twelve for girls and around fourteen for boys but acknowledged consent to be meaningful if both children were older than seven years of age.[4] There were authorities that said that such consent for entering marriage could take place earlier. Marriage would then be valid as long as neither of the two parties annulled the marital agreement before reaching puberty, or if they had already consummated the marriage. Judges sometimes honored marriages based on mutual consent at ages younger than seven: in contrast to established canon, there are recorded marriages of two- and three-year-olds.[3]
In China, 慶元條法事類 (Law Code of the Qingyuan Reign), published in 1202 which catelogued laws that came into effect from 1127 to 1195, introduced statutory rape in the following decree '諸強姦者，女十歲以下雖和也同，流三千里，配遠惡州；未成，配五百里；折傷者，絞。 [5] Successful intercourse with girls younger than 10 is considered rape in all circumstances, punishable by exile 3000 li (miles) away into the uncivilized provinces; if the rape was unsuccessful, exile by 500 li; If injury occurs in process, death by hanging'.
From 1275 in England; as part of its provisions on rape, the Statute of Westminster 1275 made it a misdemeanor to "ravish" a "maiden within age," whether with or without her consent. The phrase "within age" was later interpreted by jurist Sir Edward Coke (England, 17th century) as meaning the age of marriage, which at the time was twelve years of age.[6]
大明律·集解附例卷之二十五·刑律·犯姦, (Great Ming Code, 25th section, Criminal Code on Rape) came into effect from 1373, raised the age of consent to 12 by stating '十二歲以下幼女未有欲心故雖和同強論成姦者亦坐絞罪。 [7] Girls younger than 12 lack rational sexual desires, therefore any intercourse with them is considered the same as rape and therefore punishable by death with hanging.' -
2023-12-14 at 7:37 PM UTC"From 1275 in England; as part of its provisions on rape, the Statute of Westminster 1275 made it a misdemeanor to "ravish" a "maiden within age," whether with or without her consent. The phrase "within age" was later interpreted by jurist Sir Edward Coke (England, 17th century) as meaning the age of marriage, which at the time was twelve years of age.[6]"
finy there ya go. nuff said. id be fine. id be guilty of a bunch of misdemeanors i guess... -
2023-12-14 at 7:38 PM UTCplus y dick doesnt get hard often anmore and im or einto oral stuff i may not have been guilkty of anything back then finny.
-
2023-12-14 at 7:38 PM UTCeveryone agreed on 12 being the baseline age at the time even asians fuys:
"大明律·集解附例卷之二十五·刑律·犯姦, (Great Ming Code, 25th section, Criminal Code on Rape) came into effect from 1373, raised the age of consent to 12 by stating '十二歲以下幼女未有欲心故雖和同強論成姦者亦坐絞罪。 [7] Girls younger than 12 lack rational sexual desires, therefore any intercourse with them is considered the same as rape and therefore punishable by death with hanging.'" -
2023-12-14 at 7:39 PM UTC12 was and is the "magic number"
-
2023-12-14 at 7:39 PM UTCthe ming code even admitted girls 12 have sexual desire by stating those under do not have them in the raitonal sense guys. in the rational sense.
-
2023-12-14 at 7:41 PM UTCi would disagree with this though but maybe it is the modern world we live in. I heard of what goes on omegle for instance jsut heard guys. i mean some below this do have the curuiosity or desire at least nowadays form "what I heard" but lso i know for a fact soe this age also do not. so its a wobbler guys. 12 is a wobbler. right scron?
-
2023-12-14 at 7:42 PM UTC"The American colonies followed the English tradition, and the law was more of a guide. For example, Mary Hathaway (Virginia, 1689) was only nine when she was married to William Williams.[8] Sir Edward Coke "made it clear that the marriage of girls under 12 was normal, and the age at which a girl who was a wife was eligible for a dower from her husband's estate was 9 even though her husband be only four years old."[3]
In the 16th century, a small number of Italian and German states set the minimum age for sexual intercourse for girls, setting it at twelve years. Towards the end of the 18th century, other European countries also began to enact similar laws. The first French Constitution of 1791 established the minimum age at eleven years. Portugal, Spain, Denmark and the Swiss cantons initially set the minimum age at ten to twelve years.[6]
Age of consent laws were historically difficult to follow and enforce. Legal norms based on age were not, in general, common until the 19th century, because clear proof of exact age and precise date of birth were often unavailable.[6]
In 18th century Australia it was thought that children were inherently sinful and vulnerable to sexual temptations. Punishment for "giving in" to these temptations was generally left to parents and was not seen as a government matter, except in the case of rape.[9] Australian children had few rights and were legally considered the chattel of their parents.[9] From the late 18th century, and especially in the 19th century, attitudes started to change. By the mid-19th century there was increased concern over child sexual abuse.[9]" -
2023-12-14 at 7:49 PM UTCfinny explain it. it says toward end of 1700s european states started enacting ages of consent laws and even then it was 12 or so. show me proof people were killed by girls fmaileis for rpaing or fucking when those laws werent in effect?
-
2023-12-14 at 7:49 PM UTCwhat fucking rpoof do you have retard besides you wish it were so> you and your homosexual friend here turd temple?
-
2023-12-14 at 7:50 PM UTCsure you may find some one off case some crazy fuck willing to risk it all sword fucks a dude but how can you prove this wasnt jsut as one off of a case as a schools hooting is near you?
