It was pretty funny though. When you use numbers you lose agility and specialization. They just forced a bunch of slow, fat warm bodies into the capital and outnumbered the slow, fat uniformed bodies guarding it. They completely missed the people they should be beheading and they did it for the dumbest reason ever. If you're going to force your way into the capital and behead the leaders, you have a detailed plan and you do it for real reasons. They walked in unarmed and moved like a bunch of unruly protesters, which is what they are, didn't know where they were going, didn't smash any symbols of power and didn't hold any ground whatsoever.
There is also the fact that it was done because the former shitty president has an ego that cannot deal with failure. Literally telegraphed and said he would never accept a loss and would call it fraudulent months in advance. Although most Americans are very stupid and gullible it is inconceivable that all who participated were so incredibly stupid and gullible. Some just want to watch the world burn and some just wanted to be part of something. The problem is it was just a demonstration against a result they did not like, mostly because they liked the slow, fat rich piece of shit who just lost, more than the slow, older rich piece of shit who won. So they had a lil party and some of the weakest people died. The whole world saw and lost even more respect for America and we are all worse for it. Now there will never be another opportunity to storm the capital on vote certification day for a legitimate reason. Whenever there is tension they can use proud fags and 3% of a standard IQers to bring in the national guard and outnumber and outgun the typical fat american populace. This was an opportunity to cut SOMEONE'S head off, even though it was for a very stupid, immature reason, it was an opportunity wasted and now the world has seen americas hand and it is soft, fat and covered in festering lesions where there were once the fingers of freedom that the world was afraid of getting digitally penetrated by. Fucking Trump didn't have one fucking war either and failed at diplomacy and his 'trade wars' of incompetence. Fuck americans are stupid, probably too stupid to even read this stupid post. It's hard not to watch/obsess about the dumpster fire down south because holy fuck does it make me feel fortunate
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Also I guarantee you think about all these people more than they think of you. Every single day you make a thread about one of these people. Its weird, uncalled for and low hanging fruit, which is also your high school nickname. "Is" because you still hang out at high schools like Matthew Mcconanonce
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
also I'm so glad you used the word disabuse instead of "gaslighting" which is super trendy for moon people to say. The definition must come with the user agreement for tiktok
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Meikai
If this community (think: &T, Zoklet, RDFRN, IntoSanctuary, etc) is good for anything, I think it's probably that we're good for disabusing people of their pieties. And §m£ÂgØL is firmly one of us (one of us, one of us). He's still human so I don't doubt he has his own pieties, but he's not stupid enough to talk about them here. And he's one of us so of course he's got that itch to disabuse retards of their own pieties.
you can tie me up and disabuse me anyday bby
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Meikai
Bit of both. Definitely weighted heavily towards the former rather than the latter. §m£ÂgØL has always been a troll. He's a devious little trickster shithead, and it's as charming as it is malignant. §m£ÂgØL has been around this community for over a decade. There is no way you could chalk him up solely to "state programming" or whatever. He's a product of his environment, and a significant part of that environment for the entirety of said decade has been a chaotic sea of retards (read: us).
§m£ÂgØL is a smart, soulful dude. Also a complete asshole. Like all of us. His views as expressed on this site are probably rooted at least somewhat in his own actual views, but he's also very obviously trying to get a rise out of people. We have a solid number of vocal Trump-y retards here and they've completely forgotten the precept of "don't feed the troll". Even I get tempted to mess with them.
you literally just made his day
do me next. I need a cheering up.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Dollars to donuts they took AFP reports, and did some creative interpretation of the story. They never sent anyone to Senegal. Are you mad? When Africa kicks off the journalists get out.
I can't see more, I only see two paragraphs, and to be honest I don't have the stomach for reality fan-fiction.
That's fair. I like the short articles in the front and back of the economist better and occasionally there will be some of internet. I hate the associated press more than anything, reading their articles puts me in a bad mood. I don't know who said what to a reporter in Senegal but when you talk to a journalist in a tense situation you frame a narrative. You interview a protester and they espouse a narrative that suits their purpose. I don't know what you expect or look for in a weekly news rag. The economist is fuckin terrible now and seems like it used to be better. I've actually got the feb 20-26th economist right next to me right now. Its format encapsulates a week of brief world news pretty well, the reporting is obviously not great but it used to be better.
Do you have an alternative to the economist? I'm of the belief that all news publications are pretty shit and I have yet to see evidence otherwise
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Donald Trump
I used to read Newsweek and The Economist back in the day, before I got annoyed at all the stories that so obviously had no basis in reality.
I've had a subscription to the economist for roughly 7 or 8 years, including while incarcerated I circumvented institution rules to get them in through the library and through the mail. They have gotten worse lately but the old ones are gold for anyone who understands what it means to be a "classic liberal" enthused by neoclassical economics. I'm not sure what you mean by "back in the day" but in 2014 every issue had putin on the cover. 2017-2019 every issue has had trump. There are good articles in them, not all by any means and the features tend to be context specific and slanted (AS WITH ALL PUBLICATIONS) but it's got good info between the bullshit. More in depth, factual and involved with cold, hard numbers than most weekly's that's for sure. Don't really know a thing about newsweek.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by aldra
wasn't it cardiac arrest? I remember there were two conflicting reports, one the family paid for, not sure how that'll play out
yeah, that's true, "cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression" is the official wording in the official one, in the one from the family it's "asphyxiation from sustained pressure" and both of them don't look good for mr. piggy.
He's going to have to squeal and saw that's procedure and bring in some faggots from his union to say that's ok. DA will get emotionally charged and say "ITS PROCEDURE TO KNEEL ON A MANS NECK EVEN WHILE UNCONSCIOUS AND AN AMBULANCE IS ON ITS WAY IS IT????" and he'll be like "ummmm well he seemed like he may have been high" and the DA will say "NIGGA ARE YOU HIGH????" and everyone will laugh and clap and give him the death penalty
I really don't think this is a winnable one. I remember you thought the guy who drove through the crowd in charlotteville was going to walk and he's now doing life. Basically Chauvin has to be sacrificed in order for nothing to change. If he walks like Rodney King, shit will pop off and changes will have to be made. If he is convicted "DA HEELIN CAN BGIN!!!" and all is forgotten until next time
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by BeeReBuddy
Flyod was a hardened criminal with a long rap sheep and history of violence. Do you think the cops are going to make any progress running around catching criminals with a net?
Flyod suffered a consequence of his own actions. Drug dealers don't care who they hurt/kill with their shitty drugs. Flyod got karma and the officer was busy with an unruly crowd gathering on the sidewalk who didn't help at all.
you have the most shallow opinions. It's like when something is too nuanced and not straight forward you shut down and attack it in the simplest way possible, knowing you are not using all the right tools. I bet you are poor and in a relationship with someone who is very old
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by BeeReBuddy
I see it for what it is. You're the one wanting to spin it for something else. Every black man ever has said they were innocent. Haven't you ever watched any of the 30 years of COPS episodes. Black people are always caught in somebody else's pants with drugs that aren't theirs.
"it's simple because I'm simple"
fona your lazyness has corrupted your thinking. Every time I see you state an opinion it doesn't seem like it's based on any research or deep thought, just "muh feels" and by all means, you are certainly entitled to feel any way you want but it's stupid and you should think more
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Donald Trump
That's like me posting Alex Jones and asking you to take the article seriously.
You literally post the post moon person which has 0 accountability. At least when the NYT posts fake shit they are held to an expected standard. The article he posted was about jury selection and you can't refute any of it, which you never do anyways and just say "OMG FAKE NEWS SHEEPLE" without evidence Tthen when asked to elaborate you never do. It's §m£ÂgØL tier tactics but §m£ÂgØL can at least make a half assed attempt to back up his position.
These are things you should think about if you want to be taken seriously
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
