User Controls
Posts by Sudo
-
2021-10-27 at 5:27 PM UTC in Best Explanation Of Crypto EverI clicked this thread knowing it was a YouTube video aimed at 14 year olds that I will never watch
-
2021-10-27 at 5:22 PM UTC in Kyle Rittenhouse: Am I missing something?
Originally posted by frala He wasn’t old enough to be carrying the gun he had. He should have been at his house and he never would have needed to “defend” himself.
I agree he should have been at home drinking hot cocoa reading the Quran as well but the fact is he was hired to defend a car dealership or something and took it upon himself to bring along DAT THANG so in my mind his culpability kind of ends there.
Teenagers shouldn't be traveling across state lines with high powered rifles to defend other people's property for profit. If they are threatened and confronted there they should be allowed to defend themselves, with which I believe he showed some restraint
Was gossman or whoever shot at him then got shot in the bicep charged? He's more of a provocateur than Rittenhouse in my mind. It was a messy situation all around and the kid is a better shot than the pedophilic joos and sk8boarding weirdos who attacked him -
2021-10-27 at 5:13 PM UTC in THE MAGA PARTY!,,, the GOP is dead, republicans are going down with the dems,, get ready for THE MAGA PARTY lefty'sThe Jan 6 investigation/trial are obviously show trials ffs. So blatent it's laughable. Could have been a teachable moment about the fragility of democracy but instead its just fake outrage and renouncing their figurehead because they're still worried about his political future. Fucking stupid
-
2021-10-27 at 5:07 PM UTC in Kyle Rittenhouse: Am I missing something?
-
2021-10-27 at 5:05 PM UTC in Signed Picasso sells for less than Biden paintingI bought the Biden to hang in my pizza parlors sex dungeon
-
2021-10-27 at 5:03 PM UTC in Kyle Rittenhouse: Am I missing something?
Originally posted by aldra the only reason I brought it up in the first place was to demonstrate that political interests have openly overtaken the integrity of the legal system, which you don't even seem to be arguing against
That's true.
It reminds me of a Calvin and hobbes comic where Calvin asks his dad for a rocket launcher or something and his dad says "no, life's not fair" and Calvin says "I know but why is it never unfair in my favor?"
Because when there is the slightest chance that someone who is professionally unfair and very unfairly killed a man might have been held to a high moral standard/culpability then the cucks come outnof the woodwork to defend someone who doesn't need or deserve defending. -
2021-10-27 at 4:58 PM UTC in Kyle Rittenhouse: Am I missing something?Jigaboo Johnson has weak girly fingers and/or has never choked anyone during sex or he would have a better grasp on what constricts an airway
-
2021-10-27 at 4:24 PM UTC in Kyle Rittenhouse: Am I missing something?
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson ..Or they were biased…
"DEREK Chauvin trial juror Brandon Mitchell wore a George Floyd inspired Black Lives Matter shirt multiple times before he was involved in the case."
..this is why it will be turned over on appeal…no actual evidence of intent and biased jurors.
"How dare that black guy imply black lives matter, such bias!" -
2021-10-27 at 4:21 PM UTC in Kyle Rittenhouse: Am I missing something?
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson ..Or they were biased…
"DEREK Chauvin trial juror Brandon Mitchell wore a George Floyd inspired Black Lives Matter shirt multiple times before he was involved in the case."
..this is why it will be turned over on appeal…no actual evidence of intent and biased jurors.
I know you know sweet diddly fuck about the law but possible evidence of post trial jury bias that doesn't include bribery is not grounds for appeal.
The ironic perceived victimization is so delicious too. Inb4 "he needed a jury of 12 white cops who'd all kneeled on black nex before"
I enjoy that you share in his victimization. The black horde is coming for you -
2021-10-27 at 4:13 PM UTC in Kyle Rittenhouse: Am I missing something?
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Yes that IS how the law works, splitting hairs, getting to the nitty gritty…there was ZERO evidence that he INTENDED to kill him…as such it's not murder…as that requires INTENT…it was manslaughter (at best)…and even that's then ignoring the fentenol thing etc…reckless endangerment would be more appropriate.
ETA:
Again "Beyond reasonable doubt"
There IS reasonable doubt that kneeling on the BACK of someone's neck isn't going to kill them.
That's debatable. It was also a JURY trial which means 12 people that heard the evidence in the courtroom believed that intent was formed. I personally with that ive seen wouldn't have convicted him of 2nd degree murder but still would have sentenced him to death. Your defense is "the pig just doesn't know that restricting someone's airway as they say they can't breathe before going limp doesn't mean he knew what everyone else can tell he was doing"
"OMG a jury convicted a pig of a higher degree of criminal responsibility for someone's death, let's all be tearful victims about it"
Shut up. Nobody cares because they have better things to worry about. Take up your feelings with the cops you dress up like Ron Swanson to fellate -
2021-10-27 at 3:57 PM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Get off that bus editionThis is now a Nu metal appreciation thread
-
2021-10-27 at 3:56 PM UTC in Kyle Rittenhouse: Am I missing something?
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Yeah the law doesn't work on "Assumption"
Yes it does. Also, nowhere iny post was the word assume or assumption. Do you know anything about law? It seriously does not seem like it. Maybe things are different in jolly ol England where they'll call the SWAT team of bobbies with Billy clubs over a school marm with a sharp looking protractor but not in north America.
You're trying (and failing) to split hairs in the defense of a pig who should be publicly curbstomped a la American history X. In British History X the queen, Charles and Andrew hold him down and rape him with a scepter made from blood diamonds -
2021-10-27 at 3:50 PM UTC in Kyle Rittenhouse: Am I missing something?
Originally posted by Sudo If this is where you perceive legal injustices to be most relevant to the populace then I have some bad news for you about everything since the code of hannurabe
Well you're implying it wasn't first degree murder, which he was not convicted of or charged with. I guess you have some difficulty with the legalese but second degree is intent to commit murder or grievous bodily harm which, were I to kneel on someone's neck for 10 minutes and after saying they can't breathe they go limp and I continue to kneel on his neck, I'm going to assume this person is going to die or at least suffer terrible damage. There's a reason why there's a referee in MMA fights who ensures when someone is choked out they don't continue to apply pressure, because shortly after that the person will suffer brain damage and shortly after that they will die.
Like many a judge has said "ignorance of the law (and of human physiology) are not an excuse"
*code of harambe -
2021-10-27 at 3:49 PM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Get off that bus editionChino Moreno is the coolest name ever too
-
2021-10-27 at 3:41 PM UTC in Kyle Rittenhouse: Am I missing something?
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Everyone should care, the breakdown of the basic "beyond reasonable doubt" thing could affect everyone. It wasn't murder, anyone with even an ounce of sense knows he did not intentionally kill him, he didn't go out that day and thing…IMMA kill me a nigga today…or while he was sitting on his neck think "Hey, I'm gowna kill dis coon while everyone is here filming me do it"
If this is where you perceive legal injustices to be most relevant to the populace then I have some bad news for you about everything since the code of hannurabe
Well you're implying it wasn't first degree murder, which he was not convicted of or charged with. I guess you have some difficulty with the legalese but second degree is intent to commit murder or grievous bodily harm which, were I to kneel on someone's neck for 10 minutes and after saying they can't breathe they go limp and I continue to kneel on his neck, I'm going to assume this person is going to die or at least suffer terrible damage. There's a reason why there's a referee in MMA fights who ensures when someone is choked out they don't continue to apply pressure, because shortly after that the person will suffer brain damage and shortly after that they will die.
Like many a judge has said "ignorance of the law (and of human physiology) are not an excuse" -
2021-10-27 at 3:24 PM UTC in Has Trump done anything to help the retards who rioted for him?
Originally posted by aldra I thought lil Wayne hated him
I can't keep track
Lil Wayne's pretty apolitical but he made a big Trump endorsement in the last few weeks of the campaign. Kodak Black does alot of things for poor black chillins and is the mayor of Broward County which is probably close to Mar a Lago. Lil Wayne's charges were out of Florida too and I believe his permanent residence is in Florida.
I think Trump did those pardons to dissuade black people in Florida from using his perceived racism to justify robbing or killing him -
2021-10-27 at 3:13 PM UTC in Kyle Rittenhouse: Am I missing something?
Originally posted by aldra don't be a nigger.
negligence and manslaughter maybe (compounded by drugs and a heart condition), but there was never any evidence of intent and as far as I know there was never even any presented.
never mind how badly the jurors were tainted and the fact that the restraining technique is used in plenty of other countries with no fatalities
***anybody else who's been convicted of murder for less shouldn't have been either, it just means the system is a joke
Negligence and manslaughter sure, IIRC he was convicted of 2nd degree murder too which is kind of a stretch but I imagine charging him with that was strategic (hope for a plea deal, chance to bargain, also in my country at least a murder charge requires a jury trial where manslaughter can be decided by judge alone) and there is also what in my country is called "the knieapple principal" which dismisses redundant charges which were clearly in his case.
The most important question is, "who cares?" Who cares that a pig who killed a guy on video might have been convicted of a higher moral culpability than he had at the time? I guess contrarian cucks who like defending people who don't need defending. It's not really important to me if a pig was convicted of a crime it certainly looked like he committed but clear intent might not have been proven. This shit happens everyday
I don't think anyone, ever has ever implied the system isn't a joke -
2021-10-27 at 2:45 PM UTC in Has Trump done anything to help the retards who rioted for him?
-
2021-10-27 at 2:42 PM UTC in Kyle Rittenhouse: Am I missing something?
-
2021-10-27 at 2:36 PM UTC in Kyle Rittenhouse: Am I missing something?
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Except known radical liberal scum like Alec Baldwin, amirite?
No, as usual you are wrong
Well it was directly on camera during the filming of a movie and literally nobody said he murdered her who was there. If you read my post you would seen the qualifiers. The investigation isn't closed either.
