Now when I stumble upon another forum, it feels like shit. I don't know how niggers are still using vBulletin and shit. They are so janky and dogshit. Look like shit too. And ISS is much more performant.
You could literally sell this shit commercially and obliterate those shits. Yeah there aren't as many "features" but 99% of those can go fuck themselves anyway.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by blaster master
Hey daddyo. You been drinkin modelos and revvin ur motor up good? I been toking crystal meth kush with old ladies in taverns, these two old ladies got so stoned that one of them pissed her pants and sat there diddling herself at the bar. All the old dudes were buying me beers.
Edit: peepee lady was a little upset that i wouldn't fuck her, but once she realised she's 5 years older than my moms she understood.
toke till u woke
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
A Chico, Calif., man accused of trying to arrange meetings with a 12-year-old Orland girl he met online appeared briefly in court Friday morning, but did not enter a plea.
Maciej Wieslaw Lata, 24, was arrested May 26 at Lely Aquatic Park in Orland, following a month-long sting operation set up by the Orland Police Department. He faces one count of communicating with a minor with intent to commit lewd or lascivious acts and two counts of attempting to arrange meetings with a minor with intent to commit lewd or lascivious acts – all felonies.
If convicted, he faces between 5 to 7 years in prison and would be required to register as a sex offender.
Lata’s attorney, Dane A. Cameron, on Friday asked Judge Donald C. Byrd for a week to allow him time to get caught up on the case.
Lata remained in custody Friday in Glenn County Jail in lieu of $500,000 bail.
Police were contacted in early May by the girl’s parents after Lata allegedly made “inappropriate” advances through her MySpace page. Online conversations between Lata and a person he believed was the 12-year-old continued. However, Lata was actually communicating with an Orland police officer, police said.
Lata attempted twice to meet the girl. At the first meeting May 16 in Aquatic Park Lata reportedly struck up a conversation with an undercover officer assigned to wait for him, asking if anyone had seen the 12-year-old.
At the second meeting, on May 26, Lata was arrested. Police served a search warrant at Lata’s Chico home and seized four computers at the same time he was being arrested in Orland.
Lata posted a $10,000 bail bond the same day and was released.
The girl’s family filed for a restraining order against Lata on May 28 and expressed frustration about his release. In court documents, the family alleged that Lata told the girl she was “beautiful,” “gorgeous,” and “that he thinks about her constantly.”
The family requested a 150-yeard stay-away order, claiming their daughter was “afraid to even switch classes during school.”
Lata was re-arrested May 30 after Judge Roy G. Macfarland revoked his bail bond at the request of Orland police. Police wanted a higher bail amount because they believe Lata is “a real danger to the community,” Chief Bob Pasero said.
Pasero said police do not believe Lata attempted to contact the victim while he was out of jail.
Lata is set to appear again June 12 in Glenn County Superior Court.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Nicholson , Acting P. J.
P. v. Lata
CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
At the sentencing hearing (which went untranscribed because it was held on the misdemeanor calendar), defendant objected to the registration requirement on a basis not specified in the court's minutes. The court granted probation in accordance with the agreed disposition, imposing the registration requirement. Defendant filed a notice of appeal without requesting a certificate of probable cause (CPC).
Defendant's sole argument on appeal is that the mandatory registration requirement for child annoyance violates his right to equal protection because section 290 does not also include solicitation for prostitution within its ambit even though the proscribed conduct could be similar. We affirm the order granting probation.
Our resolution of the issue does not require consideration of the factual basis for defendant's plea. We thus omit it.
DISCUSSION
The People initially contend the constitutionality of defendant's registration requirement is not an issue cognizable on appeal because he did not obtain a CPC. This mandatory consequence of his guilty plea is not a negotiable element of his plea, and therefore a challenge to it is not tantamount to an attack on the validity of his plea that would otherwise be subject to a CPC prerequisite. (People v. Hernandez (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 641, 647-648 [disapproved in People v. Picklesimer (2010) 48 Cal.4th 330, 338, fn. 4, as to holding that challenge to registration requirement can be via postjudgment motion]; cf. People v. McClellan (1993) 6 Cal.4th 367, 380 [imposition of registration requirement did not violate terms of plea because it is not a subject of negotiation]; see 6 Witkin & Epstein, Cal. Criminal Law (3d ed. 2011 supp.), Criminal Appeal, § 16, p. 67.)
The right to equal protection under the law (U.S. Const., 14th Amend.; Cal. Const., art. I, § 7), is the right to be treated similarly to those who are similarly situated. (People v. Jones (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 220, 227; People v. Hofsheier (2006) 37 Cal.4th 1185, 1199 (Hofsheier).) One who claims a violation of this right therefore has the essential prerequisite of demonstrating that a legislative classification affects two or more similarly situated groups differently. (Hofsheier, supra, 37 Cal.4th at p. 1199; In re Randy J. (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1497, 1506.)
"Legislative classification is the act of specifying who will and who will not come within the operation of a particular law." (Connerly v. State Personnel Bd. (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 16, 32.)
As an initial matter, we note that the principles of equal protection do not apply where identical conduct is subject to prosecution under more than one statute, resulting in different punishments for different defendants. This is simply a function of prosecutorial discretion. (People v. Honan (2010) 186 Cal.App.4th 175, 183; People v. Taylor (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 318, 323; see Manduley v. Superior Court …
At the very least, as another bandaid solution, all the pedos should be contained to one forum, like The Pedo Exchange or the Pedo Lounge or the Pedo Cafe or something like that. Make them congregate there and they can discuss little girls all they want there.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Wariat
Dude I am not a bitch and I dont dwell on the past or blame others for anything especially if it was my choice. If it was my choice to sleep with an older woman or even be a prostitute as a teen i would not look for anyone to blame for my choices but myself.
So whose fault was it you went to prison?
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Wariat
Why should it be my responsibility to care or be responsible how one feels later in life? I cant or do not cocontorl how people fele later down the line…
Because your actions in the present actually do play a part in how people feel later on down the line? Like if I get you fucked up on drugs and make you suck my tranny dick and 10 years from now you realize that I drugged you and made you suck my tranny dick, you'd probably not be cool with that. All for fun and pleasure, of course, but there's a reasonable likelihood that that is not something you're going to be okay with when you eventually realize what was actually happening?
Kids are like severely drugged up/drunk adults. Wait for them to sober up, you fucking predator.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
