I think my web usage would be twice as good if it worked like I want, lol.
The thing is, I find 3 Mbps downstream rate generally insufficient for group video conferencing and dreadfully slow for downloading high-definition video. I have two devices each capable of similar rate and if I could use them simultaneously for the same cause, shit would be lit and I should be able to easily stream HD even while the service provider diddles my connections.
I'm just reading crap that other gonts like us are saying but it sounds like "Load Balancing" might be useful providing more bandwidth to one machine if you have traffic on multiple "sockets" at one time. Apparently torrenting could be well served by this, and perhaps 'normal' file downloading( would this be well described by calling it an HTTP download? ) if you use a download manager/accelerator capable of running the download over multiple "sockets". I dunno, I ordered an adapter so I can connect both modems at once and play with my router's load balancing settings.
It sounds like the best technology for what I want to do is described as "Link Bonding" or "Channel Bonding" and is performed at a lower data level ( packet level? ). Still reading about this but it looks like you might have to have a whole nother provider your web connections tie back into as the "other end" to work with..
Quick/basic description of link bonding in this short vid starting at 1:24 mark;
that skank evades my popup enhancement and advances on me physically and a clip of her plays. says some kind of slutty sales pitch about paying her for sexchat and she promises not to blow the whistle this time.
Only displays a partial version of shipment tracking info for reseller purchases and NOT the most important info to buyers;
For instance, you buy something from a reseller and Amazon will have the tracking number on their website for you to click, but it brings up only partial info on an AMAZON webpage - usually it just says something that is meaningless to the buyer such as "Package Arrived at a Carrier Facility at _____ city". No one really gives a fuck what particular facility the package is in, they want to know WHEN IT IS GOING TO ARRIVE. So you have to highlight the tracking number and paste it into the Fedex, UPS, USPS, etc website to get actual useful information such as Anticipated Arrival Date AKA THE ONE THING THAT PEOPLE WANTED TO KNOW WHEN THEY CLICKED FOR TRACKING INFO
Multiple products on one listing page If any of the products have ANY popularity, this is absolutely guaranteed to become a CLUSTERFUCK. Someone is going to leave a review for version X of the product and say its a total piece of dogshit ( but neglect to mention they selected version____. And then no one will buy version Y, or vise versa because most people are just going to assume the reviews apply to which ever option they are looking at buying. Somehow the biggest ecommerce website hasn't figured out a way to make reviews of a specific iteration of a product be attached to that item. FUCKING AMATEUR HOUR!
---- vBulletin ( actually this is probably every website but this is where I always notice it)
You do a forum search and find a specific post in your results which you click to view. What happens on pages that have a lot of images on them is the page loads over several seconds with this bombardment of images, constantly growing the scroll bar as you try to view the post you just clicked. And it FUCKS YOU UP and struggles to hold you focused on the post you clicked and instead bounces you around the page while it fills in. Why can't a website make note of the dimensions of images or other media on the page, and draw a template with that in mind from the get-go so it is already laid out at the correct dimensions and not FIGHTING THE USER as it fills in the images?
--- Tinychat
It seems to grab some kind of stranglehold on your browser - if it gets kind of laggy and you click the browser's Refresh button it typically just spins and does absolutely fucking nothing because apparently the app knows best and doesn't feel like letting you refresh the page right now. So you end up having to close the tab and renavigate to the site in a new one unless you feel like staring at a frozen page being a fuckpile for 30 seconds till it finally decides you are worthy of reloading the page.
Originally posted by Bill Krozby
fucking LOL, i was thinking more around her armpits.
i used to "date" this nurse at the heart hospital and she looked very similar to the girl in the OP and had these mole type things around her unshaven armpit. I wanted to yank them off.
looks like they were just tricking us to get hooked on the new season. now episode 3 you have to be a subscriber to watch. its the old trick of the drug dealer giving people HUGE sacks of free drugs because then you just created a free customer for life and you can rape em over teh coals and charge w/e you want huh?
Say I have access to two modems that each offer me around 3 or 4 Mbps download rate. What is a feasible way to make combined use of their connections on one machine ( hopefully at 6 or 8 Mbps down )?
I was looking at routers with built-in 'Load Balancing' support, is this useful with just a single machine trying to utilize the connections?
In one experiment, I have connected both modems to my machine and changed a network setting that seems to allow them to both be active. In ipconfig I have two active adapter configurations, each with their own local IP address. But when I bring up a speedtest website in my browser, I get the same result as with only one modem attached. So my web browser probably just picks one of the adapters, yeah?
