User Controls
Posts by Obbe
-
2017-01-19 at 7:10 PM UTC in Transniggers
Originally posted by RisiR This made me laugh, though.
I want to hear from Sophie in particular because I think he can relate to this. The world claims his condition is a psychiatric illness. I believe he prefers to define himself rather than accept how the world defines his condition as an illness. Would it be hypocritical of him to disagree with trannys doing the same thing?
It makes me laugh how hard you're trying to shit on this thread though. Whatever I did to you, it must have really gotten under your skin. I like how people are posting a variety of opinions on this topic, it's a lot of food for thought. -
2017-01-19 at 3:17 PM UTC in TransniggersLanny, Sophie, I really wanted to hear your opinions on this topic.
-
2017-01-19 at 1:13 AM UTC in Those grapes you cannot taste are always sour.Said the fox.
-
2017-01-18 at 4:12 PM UTC in Transniggers
Originally posted by RisiR In your fucking face, Obbe.
Why would that fly in my face RisiR? -
2017-01-18 at 1:02 AM UTC in Transniggers
Originally posted by snab_snib you're looking for logic and some sort of rational foundation in their madness.
there isn't any.
OK but I have one question for you: what matters more, how the world defines you or how you define yourself? -
2017-01-18 at 12:40 AM UTC in Transniggers
Originally posted by SCronaldo_J_Trump It's all a stunt to sell a book
]http://thegrapevine.theroot.com/rachel-dolezal-s-new-book-announced-twitter-reacts-1790889203
That's a lot of time and life to pour into a stunt. -
2017-01-18 at 12:35 AM UTC in Transniggers
Originally posted by a·nom·a·ly Riser thinks she is so clever by spamming this thread with a meme. That is surely something someone with a worthwhile existence would do.
I just dont understand why she gets so mad that people are discussing something that she feels the need to crash the thread. But I guess I will never understand women.
RisiR is just butthurt. Bill Krozby is just a tard. -
2017-01-18 at 12:24 AM UTC in TransniggersThanks for the well thought out reply, it will serve as food for my thought while I form an opinion on this.
-
2017-01-18 at 12:14 AM UTC in Doing hardcore psychedelics and realizing everything is a lie
Originally posted by a·nom·a·ly Attempt to come to conclusions about how to better that part of myself.
That's probably not the worst thing you could do while tripping but do you need to be tripping to do that? -
2017-01-18 at 12:06 AM UTC in Transniggers
Originally posted by Bill Krozby pretty sure I posted this already
Yes this comic was the inspiration behind this thread. -
2017-01-18 at 12 AM UTC in Transniggers
Originally posted by a·nom·a·ly Kinda depends on the specific illness. There is a class of drug users that are definitly mentally ill and in need of intervention but this is a huge minority compared to what society thinks drug users actually are. The degree of something like anxiety or depression would determine how unwell someone is as well. They are natural feelings but some brains tend to overdo it.
I guess its all about degree in my eyes. If you are gay thats whatever but if you are gay and want to go out to a parade covered in dildos and kiss dudes and act like a degenerate that is self and socially destructive and should not be tolerated.
Forget about other people, insane people, gays and degenerates for a second. What about yourself? If you woke up tomorrow and everyone you knew was telling you that something is wrong with you, that you're crazy for some reason and you totally disagreed with them, what is more important? The way they define you or the way you define yourself? -
2017-01-17 at 11:57 PM UTC in Transniggers
Originally posted by thelittlestnigger R-R-R-REPOST!
I can run around on all fours, bark and eat dog food I am still a human.
But if we could alter your DNA or perhaps "download" your consciousness into the body of a dog, would you still be a human?
And in your opinion, what's more important, how you define yourself as a dog or how society defines you as a crazy man?
Originally posted by thelittlestnigger To put it another way let us say an individual was born in India. They grew up in India and were surrounded by indian culture. We would say this persons nationality is Indian. But in this individuals mind their National Identity is that they are not of Indian descent at all. They, though being born in india, raised in india and surrounded by indian culture, have come to the conclusion they they are an Italian! In our day that is a rather insane thought. To think that you are something by "identity" and expecting others to accommodate you in an identity built of your own perception that wholly disregards the reality and circumstances that are directing your life.
But no, this Trans-Italians plight is seen and answered. Clinics open up with procedures to dye the skin the color of the individuals "National Identity" and though extremely risky this procedure is encouraged even though "Trans national" rates of suicide are actually higher after the procedure.
And we cannot forget that these rates of suicide in trans nationals could never be due to mental illness or defective psycology and must always be reinforces that the rate is higher because of their status as an oppressed people. Even though the suicide rates among all other minority groups who face similar levels of oppression are drastically lower.
And it would be a travesty and outrage when, during the olympic games, these trans nationals are unallowed to compete for the nation of their national identity rather the nation of their nationality. So we would accommodate and say "what is nationality anyway? is it not an archaic social construct? Isnt there a history of oppression surrounding this?" We must move forward and allow the Trans Nigerians to compete for Nigeria and so forth. To not do so would be a violation of our most basic human rights.
In time it comes to be that nationality as a simple and reasonable system of identification is plain wrong. It comes to be that even being a "nationalist" is something to be ashamed of because it is at its core "transphobic". Nationality is replaced by the idea of National Identity. Some people identify as a Russian though they reside in iceland. A resident of somalia becomes canadian overnight. Others believe that National Identity itself can be too restrictive and therefore become nationals of Middle Earth or Tatooine. There are even individuals who identify as Zeta Reticulations. And of course the nationally fluid must be accomodated, and people from day to day swap their national identity to whatever best suits the time.
There is actually a section of every police force specifically designed to aid transnationals who have faced adversity because of their situation as a transnational. To misnationalize is only seen as a crime of hate, discrimination and ignorance to which fines or jail time will be mandatory.
And in the end, when the change is made and we have patted ourselves on our backs for reconstructing nationality as national identity and accepting national fluidity a realization will dawn. A feeling will slowly sink in. When all is said and done no one really knows "who" they are anymore.
I really enjoyed this post, thanks for posting it again. But I am not sure where you stand on this topic. Do you think the above scenario is tragic or comedic or does it even matter? Does anyone really know who they are right now? Is there a way we are "supposed" to be, or should people just be whatever the fuck they want to be? We can imagine that in the future technology will become capable of making extreme transformations like this a reality. Do you think that's a "bad" thing or does it even matter at all? What's your reasoning? -
2017-01-17 at 11:49 PM UTC in Transniggers
Originally posted by a·nom·a·ly I think they are mentally ill and that mental illness is being perpetuated as acceptable. Its sad to me because looking at the statistics gender reassignment doesn't really make them happier more productive members of society. They kill themselves at a higher rate than any other group. They have psycological issues at a higher rate than people who identify as "homosexual". They are rejected by many people around them for their choice. It is pretty obvious that this isnt a "normal" thing.
What do you think about non-transexuals, people who society deems are mentally unwell but view themselves as perfectly fine? -
2017-01-17 at 11:46 PM UTC in Doing hardcore psychedelics and realizing everything is a lieYeah what the fucking fuck, can hardcore just mean whatever the fuck I want it to mean and be used to describe anything in just about any way I decide to? That's hardcore bro.
Originally posted by a·nom·a·ly Because my most human flaw is a subconscious need to feel superior.
What would you think about that if you were on hardcore psychedelics right now? -
2017-01-17 at 11:36 PM UTC in i am smarter than godThat sounds far out man.
-
2017-01-17 at 11:33 PM UTC in TransniggersRecently someone posted a comic about a "transnigger", which caused me to remember Rachel Dolezal, a white woman who identifies/portrays herself as a black woman. Of course people reacted to this in variety of ways. Some people commented that her behavior could be described as racist, and compared it to a person performing blackface. After reading this, it got me thinking - would these same people claim transsexuals could be described as sexist?
Either way, regardless of whether or not being "trans-something" is racist or sexist, I would like to hear all of your opinions on people like this. What do you think is more important, how these people identify themselves or how society identifies them? Does man define himself or is man defined by society? Some people, even some of the people on this very site, may possess certain traits or a condition that society defines as a mental illness, yet the individual himself may not feel that he is mentally unwell at all and may even identify as a perfectly fine human being. What's more important? How this individual defines himself or how the rest of the world defines him?
As technology progresses we can imagine that in some future timeline we may possess the technology required to actually alter a persons DNA or perhaps even create new bodies for their consciousness to enter. Imagine that in the future, men could literally become women, whites could literally become blacks, or maybe you could become a dog or a bird or a robot or whatever the fuck you wanted in this hypothetical future. Maybe even just a virtual person in some virtual reality. If we ever reached that point, would people who have undergone extreme transformations like that even be considered to be people any more? Would you still be the same person you were before? What the fuck are you anyways? Do you define yourself or does the world define you? -
2017-01-17 at 11:01 PM UTC in Doing hardcore psychedelics and realizing everything is a lie
Originally posted by a·nom·a·ly Yeah. Sometimes I get confused about which thread I am in. Thought this was the AYYYLMAO thread. But I suppose I meant SC. In anycase you are just collateral. Get over it it doesnt mean much.
Why do you want to hurt someones feelers? -
2017-01-17 at 10:12 PM UTC in i am smarter than god
Originally posted by RisiR I fucking hate Obbe so fucking much.
I don't know why. -
2017-01-16 at 10:43 PM UTC in Almost got to kill some niggers today.
Originally posted by Merlin Gibs me dat
aka free shit
I don't know if this particular woman tried to get "favorable treatment" or free shit by portraying herself as a black woman. But I do know that when her white parents told the world that she was actually a 100% white woman portraying herself as a black woman she caught a lot of flak from both sides. -
2017-01-15 at 6:58 PM UTC in i am smarter than god
Originally posted by Sophie So basically you say that being a bad person is virtuous. And here i thought you believed the left was all about inversing values.
"Bad" is subjective.
