User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 524
  6. 525
  7. 526
  8. 527
  9. 528
  10. 529
  11. ...
  12. 592
  13. 593
  14. 594
  15. 595

Posts by Obbe

  1. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Man your computer stuff looks so cool.
  2. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by aldra what, black?

    No, he's a crow, CAW CAW.
  3. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by RisiR I'm open to all ideas.

    Hahaha,

    http://www.973-eht-namuh-973.com/forum/index.php
  4. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by SCronaldo_J_Trump bnp

    Play it nigga.
  5. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Captain Falcon The conditions that produce the rainbow, are the rainbow. You could measure the same spread of colours with a camera or other methods. Your perception of those colours, are not the rainbow.

    If this is true, wouldn't it make sense that the conditions which produce you, are you? Are the conditions that produced the appearance of you, are those conditions also you?
  6. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by SCronaldo_J_Trump bumnp

  7. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by mmQ Patronizing FUCKS!

    Obbe I asked you what definition of exist you are using. Thank you.

    I don't know I didn't think about it. Is there a variety of different ways to define exist?
  8. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Captain Falcon If you believe in the existence of some objective physical reality (that the tree does fall, even if no one is around to see it or hear it), then you must necessarily believe. Maybe the qualia of "colour" in this rainbow does not exist, but the physical phenomenon that stimulates that qualia certainly does.

    I wouldn't call the conditions which produce the optical illusion of a rainbow, a rainbow.

    A rainbow is a rainbow. The conditions that produce the appearance of a rainbow are the conditions that produce the appearance of a rainbow.
  9. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by mmQ Yeah who knows? That's not like that though. You're asking if it exists, not if it looks exactly the same to every single person. People seeing things differently doesn't make those things' existences subjective. In fact it really demonstrates the opposite.

    Anyway I don't know what definition of 'exist' you're using.

    The conditions which cause a rainbow objectively exist. They can be measured, tested, etc. But the rainbow itself is entirely subjective. Just like the way a noise sounds to you might sound differently to me. If nobody were there to hear it, the noise wouldn't sound like anything. A rainbow is an apparition. It is an optical illusion, caused by conditions that objectively exist, that appears subjectively to everyone who experiences it.

    If there were no subject viewing the rainbow, it wouldn't exist. The conditions that cause it to appear would still exist. The world would still be here. But the appearance of a rainbow is dependent on a subject to perceive it.
  10. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Discount Whore In that you have the personality of a savant toddler on acid.

    Don't you think it's difficult to judge someone's personality when all you know about them is what you've read from a few posts they wrote online?
  11. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by mmQ That's like saying I only subjectively exist because sometimes people can't see me and sometimes people see me from different angles. Hrmph.

    That's like saying there is an infinite quantity of rainbows that exist all around us all the time, but you can only see them when the conditions are just right.
  12. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Discount Whore Because you remind me of my sister.

    In what way?

    Originally posted by Discount Whore I'd wager that you'd claim nothing is objectively true and have only started this thread so that you could frustrate everybody for four pages.

    If what I am saying is obviously bullshit, than why would it frustrate anyone?
  13. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Discount Whore This thread is fucking retarded.

    I think it's hilarious, why don't you?
  14. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by mmQ Rainbows are NOT subjective. You can either see them or you're blind.

    Think of your reflection in the mirror. Does your reflection EXIST? Sure does. Can you touch it, move it, smell it? No. Just like a rainbow. A non physical thing that still objectively exists otherwise we wouldn't have a name for it. Our reflections aren't real people and rainbows aren't real objects but they are both things that can be seen given the correct circumstances you will see them every single time. Objectively. :)

    Colour isn't objective. A rainbow is a colourful arch that appears in the sky. If you and your girlfriend looked at a rainbow together from point A, it would appear to be different to each of you. Subjectively different. If you called your friend who lives at point B and asked him to describe the rainbow, it wouldn't even appear to be in the same location. What's objective about that?
  15. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by greenplastic Sure, just like how I could say recognizing that things are also separate from each other has real benefits.

    So if you agree with me, what's the point in arguing with me about it?
  16. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    I think I agree with you that from an objective view, everything is meaningless. But we don't really live in that world, we live in a subjective human world dealing with human problems and assigning human values and meaning to the world. Things like life, death, work, taxes, love, pain... are not meaningless to us, these things have real, objective consequences. And IME recognizing the interconnectedness of everything has real, objective benefits to human life.
  17. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by cerakote im not saying that the illusions in them are real, im saying the optical illusions themselves are

    Right, and conditions that cause you to see a rainbow have an objective existence. But the rainbow itself is a subjective optical illusion.
  18. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by greenplastic that doesn't even mean anything though really.

    Isn't the meaning of that subjective? To you it could be absolutely meaningless, but to someone else it could be very meaningful. I don't think you really have a point.
  19. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by SCronaldo_J_Trump Yes.

    Did you like it?
  20. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by SCronaldo_J_Trump lol i dunno why i quoted that I was high

    Did you read the whole thread while high?
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 524
  6. 525
  7. 526
  8. 527
  9. 528
  10. 529
  11. ...
  12. 592
  13. 593
  14. 594
  15. 595
Jump to Top