User Controls
Posts by Obbe
-
2017-04-05 at 6:10 PM UTC in We are all responsible for the global holocaust
Originally posted by Captain Falcon No, because everything HAS to experience death. Whether or not they should is irrelevant. But cows shouldn't have to experience being born in a metal crib, raised living their entire lives in a metal box being fed grains they can't properly digest in a dark box, then herded with electric prods through a misery production line towards a bolt to the brain. That's just bad juju.
It's kind of a weird suggestion but you should play Oddworld: Abe's Oddysee, it takes a look at factory farming by putting you into the shoes of an "animal". Great game too.
That was a great game. -
2017-04-05 at 10:37 AM UTC in We are all responsible for the global holocaust
Originally posted by aldra it's actually possible. Not 'beef' of course, but plants could potentially be engineered to produce fruit with a similar nutritional value
goddamnit didn't realise I wasn't on the last page
Genetic engineering is the future:
Post last edited by Open Your Mind at 2017-04-05T10:40:50.488651+00:00 -
2017-04-04 at 9:19 PM UTC in We are all responsible for the global holocaustThe answer is genetic engineering. It will change everything.
-
2017-04-04 at 8:50 PM UTC in teh retraded thred herppppp slober fuk glum editshin
-
2017-04-02 at 4:07 PM UTC in what am i, black or summing?
-
2017-04-02 at 3:59 PM UTC in what am i, black or summing?
-
2017-04-02 at 3:49 PM UTC in what am i, black or summing?
Originally posted by Sophie Mmm, i like how everyone thinks i am the grand arbiter of who's in the club and who isn't. That being said, NARC, you're a dickhead, but i still love you. Also Obbe, i just forgot about you. And Greenplastic, i did think about you but i didn't figure you for the type who'd like a thread about himself, besides, i have no words of encouragement because you seem to have your shit together. Not that the others don't but you know…
Is it because I don't post enough? -
2017-04-02 at 3:29 PM UTC in what am i, black or summing?Me too. Feels bad.
-
2017-04-02 at 4:10 AM UTC in who here vapes weedI vape part of the time. Use the PAX2.
-
2017-04-01 at 8:08 PM UTC in New Minecraft Server
-
2017-04-01 at 3:03 PM UTC in teh retraded thred herppppp slober fuk glum editshin
-
2017-03-31 at 6:22 PM UTC in Proof of the existence of God
-
2017-03-31 at 11:58 AM UTC in Watercooling Setup PlansMan your computer stuff looks so cool.
-
2017-03-31 at 10:54 AM UTC in my life fucking sucks
-
2017-03-30 at 9:14 PM UTC in Suggest another forum to me
Originally posted by RisiR I'm open to all ideas.
Hahaha,
http://www.973-eht-namuh-973.com/forum/index.php -
2017-03-29 at 1:35 AM UTC in New Minecraft Server
-
2017-03-29 at 1:35 AM UTC in Do rainbows exist objectively?
Originally posted by Captain Falcon The conditions that produce the rainbow, are the rainbow. You could measure the same spread of colours with a camera or other methods. Your perception of those colours, are not the rainbow.
If this is true, wouldn't it make sense that the conditions which produce you, are you? Are the conditions that produced the appearance of you, are those conditions also you? -
2017-03-28 at 11:28 PM UTC in New Minecraft Server
-
2017-03-28 at 9:33 PM UTC in Do rainbows exist objectively?
-
2017-03-28 at 9:33 PM UTC in Do rainbows exist objectively?
Originally posted by Captain Falcon If you believe in the existence of some objective physical reality (that the tree does fall, even if no one is around to see it or hear it), then you must necessarily believe. Maybe the qualia of "colour" in this rainbow does not exist, but the physical phenomenon that stimulates that qualia certainly does.
I wouldn't call the conditions which produce the optical illusion of a rainbow, a rainbow.
A rainbow is a rainbow. The conditions that produce the appearance of a rainbow are the conditions that produce the appearance of a rainbow.
