User Controls
Posts by Narc
-
2019-01-26 at 5:04 AM UTC in Ghost feels that Lanny is a an electronic despot who is guilty of nepotism...So is he an electric being?
. -
2019-01-26 at 5:02 AM UTC in when pedosexuality is inevitably decriminalizedBanny'll be fappin now
. -
2019-01-26 at 4:58 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attention
Originally posted by Ghost It's legal to buy and sell in my country so it's not like I can get in trouble for mailing weed to americans
Can if its not a state thats legalized recreational weed, they'll extradite you over there. Plenty of peeps who never even set foot in america been extradited by the fed for sending illegal drugs over there.
. -
2019-01-26 at 4:50 AM UTC in My novelty domain expired :(
-
2019-01-26 at 4:47 AM UTC in San Antonio TX libraries blocking the following sites
Originally posted by We'reAllBrownNosers I was a totse member and I'm from San Antonio to top it off, I'm desensitized to everything. That gave me the idea to do some trolling, which is definitely illegal irl trolling. Tape pictures of big black cocks all over public spaces here, especially with blond girls in them.
You really know how to have a bit of fun you, don't ya?
. -
2019-01-26 at 4:35 AM UTC in when pedosexuality is inevitably decriminalizedMajority of law makers are also parents so this'll never happen outside of op and bannys dreams, lol.
. -
2019-01-26 at 4:30 AM UTC in so nis is closing down
-
2019-01-26 at 4:28 AM UTC in My novelty domain expired :(
-
2019-01-26 at 4:27 AM UTC in My novelty domain expired :(
Originally posted by Ajax You’ve mentioned that before. Surely, one would change the registered email address at all of one’s favorite sites before letting a domain expire. And yes, I called you Shirley.
Hey ajax, didn't realize you was here as well. How's it going pal? Not seen you since zoklet iirc.
. -
2019-01-26 at 4:22 AM UTC in Does anyone here want to have sex with me maybe?
-
2019-01-26 at 4:21 AM UTC in Does anyone here want to have sex with me maybe?Been told that^^ myself a few times so I know how it feels, lol.
. -
2019-01-26 at 4:20 AM UTC in Does anyone here want to have sex with me maybe?NO, IM NOT GONNA HAVE SEX WITH YOU.
. -
2019-01-26 at 4:17 AM UTC in When did fear become the recognized organizing principle of the woke crowd?I'm looking into getting this idea and experimenting with a trial site up and running at some point in future. If anyone is interested in helping or joining up then I would defo consider you. Its worth noting that whoever implemented this, if successful, could make you billions very easily. And if it was successful and works out how I envision then we"d go down in history as the people who ended war and brought peace on earth. Thats fucking huge, imagine being one of those guys? You'd literally be remembered as one of the greatest people whoever lived.
.
. -
2019-01-26 at 4:10 AM UTC in When did fear become the recognized organizing principle of the woke crowd?
-
2019-01-26 at 3:50 AM UTC in When did fear become the recognized organizing principle of the woke crowd?I haven't posted my ideal for a while but this Fred made me think it was relevant, so...
wrote this idea while i was in jail. i copyrighted it by emailing it to myself months ago so feel free to steal my idea and i'll just get rich by suing you, you can do all the hard work.
The leaderless revolution
So it occurred to me that leaders are the real cancer in society. Even if they entered political life with the best intentions, it soon happens that they become so far removed from the reality of most peoples everyday life that their policies become bizarre and totally disconnected from most peoples reality. Their need for constant re-election becomes paramount and so they have no choice but to pander to the media and the big business that finances their campaigns.
Before recent times leaders were necessary, they enabled a mass population to organize, and this is very important to a civilized society. Important decisions need to be made that thousands or millions of people just could not possibly all come together to consult and agree on. But a leader can only possibly see things from his own perspective. Of course he can consult others but he is still making decisions based on his own perception of others points of view. The longer a leader exists within his bubble, the further removed from everyday reality he will inevitably become. Of course some manage this better than others but name one leader through history that hasn't succumbed to this phenomenon.
Democracy strives to offer a solution to this problem and to be fair has made some progress. By electing officials to represent and supposedly be held accountable at the ballot box. this does in theory at least, give leaders the incentive to make decisions that are fairer and geared towards serving everybody in society equally. But does the reality work like that? We see a constant stream of election manifesto's and pledges that are then completely reversed once the officials get into office. The two party system gives little choice and rarely does either one suit any elector completely, or even close to that. The choice for most at the ballot box is simply the lesser of two evils. We all know that its either one party or the other and we'll still likely get pretty much the same old bullshit from either of them anyway.
Of course for the few months preceding an election all the candidates will fall over themselves to get media coverage, kiss babies and tell us all the things we want to hear from our leaders. But they really are just telling us any old shit to get us to re-elect them. They know full well its bullshit the moment it comes out of their mouths.
Its like choosing somebody to go and do your grocery shopping for you, you give them a list of exactly what you want. But then they go to the store and just buy whatever they think you should eat. And use your money to pay for it.
Democracy in principle is a great idea. The idea that everybody equally gets to participate in the decision making process that affects their lives. But I think it was ahead of its time. The technology of the day didn't allow for full participation and the polling system was the only effective means of enabling it. This is widely open to manipulation and corruption. And obviously it is very inconvenient, in fact likely impossible for the masses to go to the polls everyday to give their input into every decision.
A government is about organizing the population. But with the polling system the people charged with doing the organizing get free reign to organize in a way that is more beneficial to them and their peers. And why wouldn't they? I think we all would in that situation if we were honest.
So what is the solution?
We get rid of leaders? But if we get rid of leaders then how would we manage to organize a mass population? And its not like those currently enjoying the benefits of controlling an entire nation would be likely to just relinquish their power and control. We've seen many wars fought for them to keep control of exactly that.
Think about this, millions of people will vote on who wins the x-factor on a Saturday night. The process takes literally seconds. So the technology to enable everybody to vote on a single issue is clearly there and has been for some time.
But how would everybody know what to vote on? Politicians discuss the issues in detail and make decisions based on the results of those discussions. - but politicians are notorious for having their own agenda and for using power games and manipulation among themselves. Not to mention that it makes it very easy for outside forces who have money and power to manipulate the politicians. It gives them a much smaller and easier target to focus their manipulation on.
We don't need leaders any more, we need thinkers and administrators. We could employ professional thinkers whose job it would be was to think over and discuss all the countries relevant issues of the day. Go over every possible solution they could think of(just like politicians do) and look at the pro's and cons of each possibility. But at the end of the discussion period, all the possible solutions are then put up to public vote online. Each option could have a description and list the pro's and cons. The internet is full of discussion forums, so there is no reason why the very same issues could not be put up for public discussion running parallel to the thinkers discussion at the same time. The thinkers could then see what the public have to say on the issues while they are discussing them and then take that into consideration too. Of course the public discussion would probably be huge and difficult for any one person to read every post. But having a simple thanks/star button in the discussion forum would enable all the best ideas to be referenced easily. Thank buttons are common in most internet forums.
This would enable much greater efficiency within a countries system as the current method using politicians will most often see legislation on a single issue take a year or more to resolve. This alone makes the current method slow and out-dated(and it wastes a huge amount of money and resources in the process.) And there would be no chance of leaders being open to corruption, blackmail, media manipulation, ignorance or just down right stupidity.
Once a decision had been made by the people then the administrators would be given the task of turning that decision into reality. The relative resources would be made available to them to do so. The issue, once implemented could be put up for a review after a certain period and the people could then easily decide if they feel the solution is working in practice and they want to stick with that option, or if they want to change to a different option if the current system isn't actually working in practice.
So to run a country all you need is an internet forum with a voting system? - pretty much, of course it would have to be very secure as those control freak types are never going to just go away and will very likely look at ways to hack the system. Having it open source in some way would also enable the people to be sure it wasn't being rigged by the site owners. But this is technology that is already available and has been for many years.
But of course those control freaks who are in control now are never going to go for this. In fact they would do absolutely everything within their power(which is a lot of power) to make sure this never saw the light of day. - Only they would actually be pretty powerless to stop it. This would be the will of the people and if the people realized it, their power combined is way too powerful for the few to stop it. A simple internet forum, similar to what i've just mentioned should be put up as an experiment, just to observe and test its efficiency. It would enable the people to discuss all the relevant issues of the day, propose solutions, and allow everybody to vote on them. We could then compare the solutions that the people come up with to the solutions our politicians come up with. Of course we'd have to wait a while for those slow, lumbering politicians to get their shit together to compare results to. All that manipulating, being blackmailed or bought off takes time you know. But I suspect the peoples solutions to the problems would be far more realistic, relevant and creative to anything the politicians offered.
Once this site had shown its worth and potential we could then put a question up to the vote on the site.
Would the people like to adopt this system in place of the current system?
If the people vote yes then it is a simple step to getting rid of the current system. The people just choose to collectively ignore the current system and continue with this new system. The thinkers and administrators would have to be chosen and appointed but that wouldn't be much of a problem. In fact the thinkers could already be appointed and be working from their own section of the site before that question was even put to the vote. The thinkers should be picked from all walks of life, young and old, rich and poor, black and white etc, so as to offer diversity and not enable a certain section of society the chance to dominate the discussions. There would be absolutely nothing the current leaders could do to stop this, and to even try would show them in a very anti-democratic light. With nobody listening to them or paying them taxes, their power would literally disappear overnight. It would be like a puff of smoke dissipating into the atmosphere.
A very crucial point to realize here is that wars are the power games of leaders. They are the ones who have the real interest in wars being fought and won. The man in the street has little to gain from war and most, without leaders convincing them otherwise, would not choose to start one. They are the ones who have everything to lose from war. So if every country had adopted this system, do you think the people collectively from any country would then so choose to go to war with another country? Its unlikely isn't it? So the fact that this system could potentially bring peace on earth makes it totally worth at least trying it out. I know that's a huge thing to think about, but does any other system come even potentially close to realizing this goal?
Apart from that, implementing this system would be unlikely to change anybodies normal day to day living. You would still live with your families and go to work, socialize, tend to your needs etc. but this would make things way more efficient. Government resources would stop being wasted and stolen. The elite would no longer be able to control the majority in their favor. People could still get rich, but they would have to earn it. But I think we would see opportunity get dished out more evenly which would benefit us all and not marginalize certain individuals or groups. And if we ended wars just think how much of the human races resources would be saved and put to much better use.
I've thought a few times as to what to call this ideal, this new way of doing things. Things like neo-democracy or real democracyism or some stupid shit like that. But this isn't an ism at all, this is a completely new way for the human race to organize itself, moving on from the retardation that is isms. I think its long overdue for the human race to move on from the situation where there are people living in obscene luxury owning billions that they will never spend whilst millions starve, cannot access basic healthcare, have nowhere to live, have no opportunity to make a living, cannot even get clean water to drink, whilst we all live subjected to stupid laws that just make problems worse and half the time are only designed to control us all through exaggerated fear. And just end up costing the people more money that could have been put to good use in the first place.
And to all the naysayers, I say you should support the trial experiment of this idea because its failure would then prove your point, wouldn't it?
In fact I urge you to discuss this idea in great detail. I'm sure there are many factors I alone could not imagine and i'm also totally open to the fact that I may be missing something here. This is how I see it tho, and I really think its something worth pursuing. And I am definitely open to improving it in any way imaginable.
I'm not saying this is a solution to all man's problems. But it could certainly enable us to free up a wealth of resources that are wasted due to our current ways of doing things. It would make the human race way more efficient as a whole
. -
2019-01-25 at 10:02 PM UTC in The free movies on YouTube fredNot a bad little Aussie bank robber movie
First five minutes I thought it was gonna be shit but turned out not too bad in the end.
I think it might've been true story an all.
. -
2019-01-25 at 4:29 PM UTC in I just woke up because my hand had fallen asleep...
-
2019-01-25 at 4:12 PM UTC in When did fear become the recognized organizing principle of the woke crowd?
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING IV: The Flower of Death and The Crystal of Life Do you ever notice TV now tries to induce anxiety. Even documentaries have suspenseful musical scores and try to make cliff-hangers out of crap like researchers not having their equipment in time. I can't watch Sky News because the anchors and reporters on it act purposefully like something major is happening, speaking in an urgent tone, like aliens were invading or something. And on every other channel Orange Man or Brexit about to ruin the world.
You wind up feeling nervous dread just having that sort of nonsense on in the background. It's deliberate psychological abuse.
One of the main reasons I stopped watching TV and reading newspapers all together. I'm so much happier and my life is so much better since doing so.
You think you'd miss TV but the reality is you don't at all.
. -
2019-01-25 at 4 PM UTC in Moms against vaping
-
2019-01-25 at 3:51 PM UTC in When did fear become the recognized organizing principle of the woke crowd?
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson However, somewhat counter to fear/common sense being siblings…Americans for example have a fear of terrorist attacks and other such unlikely shit…you're more likely to die in a car crash than a terrorist attack but a fear of terrorism is greater in your average American idiot that their fear of driving to Walmart….demonstrating nicely that fear and common sense are not necessarily related.
Exactly, many more people die taking selfies but you don't see that constantly on the news because there is no political value to be garnered from that. You can't sell false security to people from the danger of their own stupidity, there has to be a "monster" to make them believe they need protecting from.
Where you think stories of monsters, dragons, witches, demons etc came from? This isn't a new phenomenon, greedy control freaks having been using this system to control and exploit mass populations for millennia.
.
