Originally posted by SCronaldo_J_Trump
Also Wtf is a "hardcore" psychedelic?. Either its a tryptamine or its not. Labelling it as hardcore makes me less believe you took something legit.
I would say LSD is one of the hard ones or ALD-52. DMT is a pretty intense trip but short. Id still call it hard. You can judge for yourself what a "hardcore" psycedelic might be. And saying "lol its tryptamines" is kind of silly. I mean DMT and NMT have very different effects but are pretty similar still. MDMA can be soft at small doses but become hard at higher doses. Hell if you do meth for a week or two straight you will probably have a pretty trippy fuckin ride at the end. Ketamine could probably be hardcore too but I havent done it myself so I would have to try it before arriving at a verdict.
Anyway you are kind of a dick about other peoples drug use. I dont see it as my place to question anyone elses preferences or experience. Its just kinda faggy to be like "You probably took bullshit drugs" just to make yourself seem more "experienced" in drugs or something. And why would I give a shit if a methhead on the internet doesnt believe I took something legit? The experiences I have had with drugs are my experiences. I hold absolutely no value to the degree of legitimacy you hold to them.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Bill Krozby
well then you should be open to the world being flat and the moon being hallow
Honestly I dont have a solid position on the moon being hollow. I highly doubt that it is hollow but I would be interested in confirming that myself using some simple radio telescope setup. Should be easy enough to devise a test to see what the reverberations I get back are and if they are congruent with a solid or hollow mass.
Flat Earth theory is pretty dumb though imo. If the earth was flat you should be able to stand on the coast and see the coast of the next continent over. Also once you understand how maps work it just becomes silly. Seriously dude, if you are open to the world being flat you should be open to studying an orthographic or steriographic maps just to get an understanding of why such distortion takes place when a sphere is projected onto a surface.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Bill Krozby
And in fact science has been proven to be wrong many times before.
But the instances where it is wrong it was proven to be so using the scientific method. Which kind of makes the body of knowledge that is science a self correcting system.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Sophie
Sure, but because there is no evidence of flying spaghetti monsters would it be reasonable to assume they exist? I don't think it would be.
Just to be contrarian what is the line between flying spaghetti monster and flying saucer? Why is one more reasonable and the other not? I have my own understanding of why one is more realistic but I would be interested to hear your explanation.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by SCronaldo_J_Trump
I get home and start on either beer or cider than I make a cocktail in 3 hours, have a few of those and finish the night off with a white Russian, extra cream and slowly sip that as I let the cannabis and benadryl force me into dreamland.
I get home and start on either a shot of whiskey, or recently very high proof grain alcohol. Between each shot or so, ill enjoy either a beer or some wine from the bottle and finish off the night by saying "Fuck, i dont even get drunk anymore. what am I doing with my life?" before I decide that conciousness is fucking bullshit, shuffling to bed and sinking into a glorious oblivion.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
You should give your aunt a gun so she can zim zam them herself. Calling you is like waiting for the cops to show up. They will either have been raped and beaten or the nogs will have run off. Why call someone with a gun and not have one yourself is beyond me.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by SBTlauien
Well, we can't legally hack back in retaliation.
I dont believe this is true. People say the second amendment is the right to bear firearms, but in reality (and many who do not live in reality disagree with me here) it pertains to the right to bear arms in an extremely general sense. Basically its meaning should be taken constitutionally as a leveling of the playing field. So in any warfare the playing field should be equal between citizens and oppressors. I take this to mean that cyber-arms are protected under this amendment. Perhaps the Federal Courts wont agree, but those courts themselves are the exact thing this amendment was created to protect us against. So fuck it man, if the FBI is oppressing you, you have a constitutional duty to fight back with whatever arms you have.
Why did a black van just pull into my driveway?
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Sophie
Word, it would also be a good stepping stone on the way to Assembly i would figure. And C and Assembly is something i reckon i will need for sure if i want to up my malware analysis/development game.
There is a book I mentioned in one of your other threads that teaches C and Assembly and shell scripts. I never really got too far into it but I would imagine it would be a great beginner book for someone with the motivation to learn CS. If you can find a download for Hacking: The Art Of Exploitation I highly recommend it.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
