User Controls
Posts by littleasianlady
-
2016-12-14 at 8:51 AM UTC in Space questions.Okay Lanny.
-
2016-12-14 at 8:50 AM UTC in polygraph.infoIt's the department of state.
-
2016-12-14 at 8:50 AM UTC in polygraph.infoYeah but it doesn't mean they're not facts.
-
2016-12-14 at 8:48 AM UTC in Space questions.Something is not theoretical when it has proofs.
I am not wasting any more time with you. -
2016-12-14 at 8:47 AM UTC in Space questions.Lanny you don't deserve this kind of attention from me.
You're too stupid to be educated.
Continue believing whatever is forced down your throat. Even with the evidence right in front of you.
I'm not here to help you anymore Lanny. You're a fool. -
2016-12-14 at 7:52 AM UTC in Space questions.
Originally posted by Lanny To repeat, that was a reductio argument, I'm trying to demonstrate how we can have non-direct experience of a thing count as evidence for it.
So you admit you are a fuckwit?You seem upset.
You seem like a simpleton who is frustrating me by being unable to grasp a simple concept.I haven't actually googled anything related to black holes recently but I don't really see how it would be a problem if I did. Surely your vast knowledge of physics could withstand a layman with an internet connection without resorting to "I just know better".
I don't know why you are writing I didn't provide proofs.What exactly do you think it means for a scientific theory to "be proven"?
When it stops being theoretical science.While we're at it, why don't you give us your definition of a black hole.
You're an idiot. -
2016-12-14 at 5:45 AM UTC in Life is more interesting without scientific labelingsSounds like me in Poland:"“I was deranged,” says Half-Life writer Marc Laidlaw of his decision to publish the plot of Episode 3 as fanfiction. “I was living on an island, totally cut off from my friends and creative community of the last couple decades, I was completely out of touch and had nobody to talk me out of it. It just seemed like a fun thing to do… until I did it.”"
-
2016-12-14 at 5:40 AM UTC in Iran vows to develop nuclear program after U.S. "violations"Yeah that's the thing though.
It is military technology. It is not civilian technology.
You have to make the determination that that is the case to be able to understand why this stuff is BAD. I'm not in favor of legalizing SAM's. I have no problem with private ownership of bulletproof vests and assault rifles.
You don't have a nuclear reactor in your backyard. -
2016-12-14 at 5:28 AM UTC in Iran vows to develop nuclear program after U.S. "violations"Nuclear reactor ships are very uncommon and are essentially only a military design that enables you to stay operation for extended periods of time without having to refuel. It also allows you to carry extra supplies such as food or weapons because you don't need to carry fuel.
Pretty much the only guys who used reactors in non military ships were the Soviets, and that was in government owned icebreakers used by the military to rescue ships stuck in ice.
So technically they were navy ships. -
2016-12-14 at 5:20 AM UTC in Space questions.Okay, according to the current accepted theory for black holes.
There are no black holes.
If they had a different theory to prove the existence of a similar thing, then yeah, maybe there are black holes.
But based on the current concept of what a black hole is, and the evidence they push for black holes, no way do black holes exist. -
2016-12-14 at 5:12 AM UTC in Space questions.I couldn't answer that.
I can tell you that based on the evidence presented for black holes, that if that is what you are relying on, that there are no black holes. -
2016-12-14 at 5:11 AM UTC in Iran vows to develop nuclear program after U.S. "violations"
-
2016-12-14 at 5:08 AM UTC in Space questions.How am I supposed to be capable of attributing a percentage of how likely it would be for something like that to exist?
There is so much maths in that it is not funny. NOT EVEN A LITTLE BIT.
Eg, if Einstein's equation was out by 0.001%, then WOAH EVERYTHING WE KNOW ABOUT SPACE IS OFF BY ABOUT A BILLION LIGHT YEARS.
And there is no way it was not off by more than that. So yeah, Einstein had all these formulas, that are sound formulas, but the inputs, things such as the energy equation, the speed of light etc ARE NOT SOUND. THEY ARE GUESTIMATIONS.
The rest of the maths works, but then you have to acknowledge THERE IS NO PROOF FOR HIS DETERMINATIONS ON ENERGY EQUATIONS OR THE SPEED OF LIGHT.
Therefore, everything is out by so much it isn't funny.
And radio waves are just that. The whole spectrum is out there able to be detected. They grab a few bandwidths and decide A HA! THAT IS THE BLACK HOLE. NAME IT AFTER ME. -
2016-12-14 at 4:59 AM UTC in Space questions.THERE IS A THEORY THAT BLACK HOLES ARE REAL.
THAT IS ALL.
A THEORY. -
2016-12-14 at 4:46 AM UTC in Space questions.You have no idea of science.
Two posts ago you were asking me to prove radio waves were real, and that they are also theoretical.
THEY ARE NOT. YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT RETARD.
And now you are using google-fu to pretend there is proof for black holes.
You are using information that is explained in simple English for the explanation of a scientific theory that has acceptance but IS NOT PROVEN.
Once again, there is no proof black holes exist.
Go back to asking me to prove radio waves exist, or that because we can't 'see' radio waves, they are as unprovable as black holes.
You're a fucking retard.
-
2016-12-14 at 4:17 AM UTC in Space questions.Um apparently the theory of light bending over the horizon is due to the speed of light relative to the distance of the sun. Or it could be refraction.
That is also a theory that isn't proven.
Lanny....
You're being a tool so I'll stop being nice.
You're wrong and arguing for no reason.
There is no proof of black holes. There is no photographic evidence of a black hole. There is no proof, only theories, of black holes.
PROOF OF RADIO WAVES:
I CAN MAKE A RADIO TRANSMITTER AND A RADIO RECEIVER AND THE VARIABLES THAT DETERMINE MY ABILITY TO TRANSMIT AND RECEIVE REMAIN THE SAME. THINGS SUCH AS ANTENNA LENGTH AND COILS AND THINGS LIKE WATTS ETC.
THEY WERE THEORIES THAT UNDERWENT RIGOROUS TESTING AND BECAME PROOFS. THE PIECES OF THE PUZZLE THAT MAKE UP ELECTRICITY AND RADIOS ARE SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN AGAIN AND AGAIN. WHETHER THE DESCRIPTION OF THE FOUNDATIONS IS ACCURATE IS NOT 100%, BUT THE FACT IS THEY EXIST AND CAN BE MEASURED WITH CONSISTENT RETURNS IN A GIVEN SITUATION WITH NEGLIGIBLE VARIABLES. FOR FUCKS SAKE WE EVEN HAVE RADAR. THIS STUFF IS PROVEN BEYOND A DOUBT. I AM USING WIFI RIGHT NOW. PROOF OF CONCEPT PROOF OF FEASIBILITY. PROVEN.
NOT LIKE YOUR FAGGOT BLACK HOLE. -
2016-12-14 at 3:33 AM UTC in Space questions.If I see bent light over the horizon is that a black hole, or is that light doing what it does?
You can't prove black holes exist. You can prove a mathematical formula and then claim that mathematical formula proves a black hole, but at the end of the day, the only part that makes sense is the equation. The rest is guessing. -
2016-12-14 at 3:32 AM UTC in Space questions.
Originally posted by Lanny And I have images of gravitational lensing. Hearing FM radio is not direct perception of radio waves, it's perception of an effect of radio waves.
You might be smart, and I don't know if you are, but you are guessing here. You don't know this subject. There are tests and proofs for radio waves being real. By the fact that science can determine FM broadcasts and my ability to receive FM broadcasts. It is highly accurate and proven and not speculative. That is proof of radio waves and the electromagnetic spectrum.Maybe you didn't understand my argument, it was a reductio. I don't think anyone denies heat or light exist and yet we only have an indirect perception of them, there exists a fallible mechanical system between our experience and the reality we posit to exist, so this doesn't block our ability to assert something as true. Likewise we can't directly see black holes but we can perceive their secondary effects, like emission of energy or bending of light. I think this is sufficient evidence to posit their existence just as indirect evidence for something like heat is considered satisfactory.
Yeah I understand philosophy. I also understand that radio waves are proven to exist. If they weren't, an FM radio receiver would be a theory and not something in every car.
I also understand you are using big words.
That doesn't change what is proven, that is, FM radio is real.
Black holes are not, or at least, they are a theory. -
2016-12-14 at 2:52 AM UTC in polygraph.infoYes. Do it now.
-
2016-12-14 at 2:39 AM UTC in polygraph.info
Originally posted by Merlin It's just anti-Russian propaganda in snopes format.
No it's not.
It's magic faggot.