User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. ...
  7. 9
  8. 10
  9. 11
  10. 12

Posts by littleasianlady

  1. Originally posted by HampTheToker I know I can't be the only non anti-semite here…

    Anti semitism gets major media coverage and social penetration.

    The reverse is not true. You don't see any activism or coverage in favor of Israel or jedis.
  2. Militant cults are easier to create than pretty flower religious groups living in a forest retreat with Bambi.

    They have a proven cause to work for, not faith which can reduce over time. Counter society falls back in to society because it is about society, living standards and way of life.

    With the militant cult you can keep them forever.

    "We don't know what god wants, but it sure as hell ain't what the president says is god's wish because I seen them FEMA camps. Surely a righteous god wants freedom and liberty and love for all. Like the original constitution, not this NWO shit."

    Those guys are fighting for their own salvation when trying to save you. Not for money or power or right vs wrong.

    That eternity shit is hard to get out of if you were committed to saving the eternal soul from the start and weren't just viva la revolucion

    They can last a long time and have a mindset that prevents boredom setting in. It's not fairy tale hold hands and drink herbal tea. It's fighting for humanity. Very different mindset.

    Post last edited by littleasianlady at 2016-12-16T16:15:44.950185+00:00
  3. That pizza could be intentionally anti jedi. We just don't know the intentions of the designer. He might have wanted a reaction from every jedi who saw it. He might be going after the jedi psyche.
  4. It's true. You get anti jedi shit mainstream.

    BDS at university

    Lupe Fiasco this week

    Designers putting Nazi symbols in their items for shock advertising, by making the jedi cry in public and advertise the product.

    The jedi is copping it from heaps of urban degenerates. And they're getting away with it. No one considers anti jedi stuff to be that serious.

    The jedi is very oppressed.

    Sometimes the internet says he invented communism, capitalism and Freemasonry and is the hidden hand behind world events. Paving the way for holocaust v 2.0?
  5. It's like totally offensive to jedi's. They can't eat shellfish.

    And here is this pizza.

    With shrimp. And bacon. And funky cheese.

    Any other religious group would raise this as an issue if something similar happened to them. Eg, bacon felafel.

    But the jedi is so downtrodden he lets it pass.
  6. Now I know jedi's can't have meat and dairy in the same meal. So unless it is vego pizza they can't do it.

    But check this:

    Prawn, bacon and fetta pizza!

    Prawn, bacon and a type of cheese separately identified.

    I'm telling the Mossad.
  7. Meth puts holes in your brain.
  8. Wasn't Cleopatra killed by an asp? Wasn't she a pharoah? Therefore wasn't a god killed by a regular snake?

    God snake must be pretty powerful.
  9. Yeah but even though it is that much more potent and active at that dose, is that enough to occupy enough receptors and give you anything?
  10. Lupe Fiasco rapped about ‘dirty jedi execs’ in a new song. Then a wave of fans and detractors, including the ADL’s Jonathan Greenblatt, called him out for the lyrics

    http://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/220067/anti-semitic-lupe-fiasco-jonathan-greenblatt-adl
  11. Control over U.S. government international broadcasting will be consolidated under a powerful chief executive, under legislation expected to soon be signed by President Barack Obama.

    http://www.voanews.com/a/new-law-would-reorganize-voa-other-us-government/3635977.html
  12. So anyway, is the world really trying to destroy Israel? Is that what the governments want?

    Is the USA trying to destroy its' ability to be accepted around the world, and therefore destroy the ability for its' foreign policy aims to be welcomed by the rest of the world because of social unrest and widespread opposition to the US government? Is it trying to make the Department of State irrelevant?

    Or is this a smoke screen? You obviously don't get in to government without government approval, and the government went to Iraq without UN approval.

    So is the government a separate society? And they are redirecting angst to make the future direction of society correspond to their aims?

    And still disregarding the will of the people but having social angst heading a direction they want to still maintain control over the direction of society?
  13. Like you know these people. The one's who are essentially full time activists. They're not like out there for one issue and when it's done they're gone, they're full time sticking it to the man, and going after any little thing that can harm the government or the reputation of the government.

    So contrast them with the Dakota Access Pipeline protesters who are Native folk protecting their ancestral homelands and sacred grounds, to the Dakota Access Pipeline protesters who last week were at the Occupy Wall Street protests. They are just in it for ways to erode the reputation and confidence held in the government. If they think this issue can arouse public opposition to the government they are in it.

    You get them putting the posters up around universities and campus towns, you get them setting up stalls in the same places and at subway stations. Handing out leaflets and similar. Anywhere there is a social movement they can try and infiltrate they will. They're not in it for anything other than viva la revolucion.

    So yeah, at this protest, they weren't many of them. Around 20 or a few less. They were outside a government building. They were protesting the education system and how it needs to boycott a government policy related to children overseas not getting a fair education. The issue is emotive and therefore very easily able to be adapted in to mainstream consciousness, because it is a human rights type of issue, like empathy. It was not like a march down the main street or in a particularly public place. It was at a government department head office that I was walking past to get to the train station.

    They seem small and insignificant right? 20 people doing this on this day well out of the public eye.

    WRONG. THEY ARE SO INFLUENTIAL.

    The shit they get involved in has penetrated society. They have been doing this type of stuff for years. Their issues are getting mainstream media coverage and mainstream social acceptance. They have infiltrated future generations via university activism. They just turn up on campus and aren't even students...

    So you get all these young people, the emerging generations who are just starting to become politically astute or aware, getting exposed to this type of propaganda and it is very convincing and emotive. Most people aren't inhumane monsters comparable to the politicians and groups that are being presented to them as inhumane monsters. So they are out there feeling warm and fuzzy and wanting to make the world a better place and shunning mainstream political thought as brainwashed sheeple etc. WHICH IT IS. But it is not being deceived by the propaganda of the full time activist groups. We are talking over 20 years of infiltration. They have changed society.

    They present as approachable and don't tell you that they support Hamas. Not because they are Palestinian, but because they identify Israel as a part of the USA and therefore need to take Israel down because they are going after America. They tell you what you need to be manipulated to do their bidding. That's their aim. It's not social justice. It's revolution.

    Like one of the people at the protest had the megaphone out and was saying how she was a school teacher. She was saying how she has got the future generations of GRADE SCHOOL KIDS supporting her, and that she is not the only teacher doing it. They are totally telling you how they are fighting the government.

    So as you can see, a full time activist can convert 100's of people. They aren't as small as they seem. Their influence is wide spread, and they are full time trying to spread influence. Not the same as someone hearing something on TV and thinking it's not right or it doesn't make sense, but full time preachers with misconstrued facts to fill in the blanks and going after as many people as they can to convert them to the faith. And it's not about making the world a better place, it's about making conditions where the current system becomes widely opposed leading to regime change due to instability.

    So then you start thinking, how does this shit happen?

    How is it in the interests of the government for stuff like this to be happening? In America this is stuff the FBI looks at. In England it's MI5 stuff. It's not activism, it's active subversion.

    These groups are identified with organisation names, symbols, publications and planned meetings and gatherings. They are totally controlled by the government agencies. Because of what they are involved in, the government could stop you associating with them and label you a national security risk. They are not loose groups that meet spontaneously at the local cafe and start feeling inspired and march to city hall.

    So anyway, the government obviously can control who is a part of these groups. They can also obviously control the activities of these groups. And these groups still exist with wide access and reach in society, and especially in to future generations and their thinking and interaction with their environment.

    The government is clearly doing something with these people.

    They are breaking laws like sedition and subversion. There are laws against their activities. There are also laws specifically that restrict public gatherings and can be used against all kinds of groups. These laws DO get used. But against these organised groups, they are not. Obviously they are never used against spontaneous gatherings, but people who do this stuff week in week out get targeted and must get police approval for a protest and they can be refused permission to gather in public for reasons such as safety (risk of violence from opposition groups), public order (riots) or national security (sedition again). And you can get arrested for an illegal public gathering if you are doing it every week full time and not getting permission.

    Clearly, quite clearly, these 'enemies of the state' are doing the bidding of government agencies. They are, for want of a better word, secret agents of influence the government is using to alter the social fabric.

    Because what they are doing is so illegal and can prevent them having the access to society that they have for spreading their influence. They can be placed under curfew and have their social contacts restricted. Which does happen to some people, but not these organized groups. Because they are government agents!

    So yeah, they are allowed access to emerging generations, influence in the media, the ability to be the 'authority' on emerging political trends and the ability to establish the direction and parameters of emerging trends and have been for some time. These progressive issues eventually become mainstream. These people are controlling the future mindset of society.

    So what are these things that are 'subversive enemies of the state'?

    They are groups and ideologies the government wants you to look towards when feeling disenfranchised with the government, and to then assist them with their goal of 'sticking it to the man'.

    They are clearly majorly infiltrated and controlled by government agents. They are doing activism to change the direction of society in a way the government could prevent them from doing. So this is what the government wants. The government can stick you there, or encourage you to go there in order to reduce your ability to harm or effect the government, by tricking you in to thinking you AREN'T doing the bidding of the government.

    And then, when they turn up in small regional centres or fringe activist groups as a part of their attempt to gain momentum on anything that can harm the government?

    They are actually informants for the government reporting on subversive movements that already exist and are just trying to consume them to redirect their purpose.
  14. Originally posted by Sophie I think it's funny how religious people treat atheism/science as a competing religion. I don't believe in God, not because anything proves God doesn't exist but the absence of any sort of indication or proof seems to suggest that there is no such thing as God. People who say: Prove God doesn't exist. Are retarded, logically speaking if the only evidence for God's existence is a lack of evidence for him not existing, then you haven't proven anything at all.

    Furthermore, if i were to suppose God did in fact exist then i would say science, is the means by which we would understand God's design.



    Post last edited by Sophie at 2016-12-14T15:36:25.416075+00:00

    Yeah God is an unproven theory unless you have experienced divinity. At the same time the existence of or initial creation of matter is outside proven science that we have access to and is also completely theoretical.

    Yet these notions have popular acceptance, eg, anti matter theories etc.

    God and supernatural makes far more sense than the theories put forward about the creation of the universe.

    But because it can't be quantified it is not able to postulated as a scientific theorem.
  15. Originally posted by Anal Scratch Hemorrage Actually, they're is a reason why chinks have chinky eyes. they are descendent of the people of the mountains during the ice age. the excess of light because of the sunlight bouncing all about the place on the white shiny snow forced them all to chink their eyes like that to reduce the amount of light they received to avoid being blinded. over the thousands years their faces just adapted to be like that.

    The theory of evolution was actually portrayed by German priests and philosophers in the 1600, that is, 200 years before Charles Darwin was born. Their belief of the process of evolution began with spiritual evolution. This way, the process of adaptation of beings was actually the result of a metaphysical intelligence. As the spirit became more complex or started to seek a better body for itself so that it could actively explore and express itself with more freedom, evolving from simple chemicals into a bacteria, then into a colony, then into a more complex organism, then into a sea creature, they into a sea creature that could breathe air, then into something like a seal, later a land animal, and ultimately into a hominid, the form with the body most fit for adaptation and intelligent modification, for it can build and use tools etc that it can use as an extension of its body.
    Unluckily, very few writings of this were actually published, they mostly remained a secret among religious scholars and those that did remained only known to Germans because nobody but them speaks that fucking language.
    When Darwin published his own study he utterly failed to plot a relation between life and spirit. Most probably because he was a nihilist like David Hume and Frans Voltaire. thanks to this, people starting back then started to believe that science and religion opposed one another. Specially because thanks to the Greeks and the Romans, people actually believed the whole Adam and Eve tale was totally literal and that some guy called Adam was made from a mud statue then had a rib ripped off and from it a girl was cloned, when in fact these are only literary figures from a Sumerian poem. Adam means "clay" and "Ewwa" (Eve) means companion. Adam being birthed from clay refers to life emerging from the earth. Eve, his companion, was taken from a rib on the left side of his chest, that means, from his heart; a pretty romantic picture actually. In some translations it is actually explained that God created them in pairs so that they could live each other and never feel alone and thus remember God's mercy through the love they felt for each other.

    That's a theory.

    With common acceptance.

    But it cannot be proven. It is a theory.
  16. Originally posted by bling bling the electrons on your screen are connected with the electrons on your eyes right now and share their vibrating force so you can read my comment.
    all atoms are constantly vibrating due to kinetic energy carried by charged particles within.

    Therefore I am the moon.

    But you're not. Just me. Only me.
  17. donkey kong returns in 3d.

    it's not worth what you pay for it, but it's not bad.

    eg, the pricing is up there with a console game, but it is no where near the game you would get for a console.
  18. They were my favorite band for a while.

    JPN was an album I used to listen to constantly.

    They have that song Naturale ni Koishite.

    no honomono means 'real' in english

    when that song says:

    君の好きそうな映
    画頑張って横で見るけど

    2:03 - 2:08

    it sounds like

    kimmy not schizo not egg ah
    dumb cunt dare you call that me

    Post last edited by littleasianlady at 2016-12-14T18:36:00.478845+00:00
  19. If you wanna look at it in black and white, are you really getting high off this shit? I have this theory that no you're not but you are 'self enhancing'.
  20. Yeah I remember Linux. My fan used to run so hard.

    So now I just windows for music, internet, downloads and torrent for movies and get them in HD and play via USB for tv.

    Games is 3ds and PS4 or 3.

    And there aren't many games worth playing on console.

    Watch dogs 1 & 2
    Gta series (iv is great so need PS3)
    Sleeping dogs
    Farcry needs mouse but you can buy a PS3 mouse

    That's pretty much it.

    And then on 3ds in bed mario, donkey Kong, Pokemon, harvest moon, fantasy life.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. ...
  7. 9
  8. 10
  9. 11
  10. 12
Jump to Top