2018-01-01 at 4:58 PM UTC
in
Fags shouldn't raise children
Originally posted by infinityshock
you only support fags raising children because you enjoyed it when your two daddies fought over who got sloppy seconds out of your asshole every night. normal children do not enjoy that sort of bugg-tardery.
faggots should not have children. if the actual facts were known, and not the fake-news from the MINITRU telling how wonderful the faggot lifestyle is…and how super-dooper dykes and fags…those faggots would never be allowed near children, much less as 'parental' figures.
go ahead…i dare you to find an adult who was raised by faggots (of either sex)…then question them on how their lives were. ive done it and every single one said they loved their parents, but they hate their lives. they all turn out to be broken in one way or another…EVERY SINGLE ONE of them is on a prescription medication of one sort or another.
Look how shitty I turned out, and then realize I was raised by two of the most normal, straight, suburbanite white parents imaginable.
Ain't no telling who is going to fuck up a kid. Consider the following: like 70% of people are terrifyingly retarded or fucked up in some obvious way, and most them were raised by straight folks.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-09-23 at 6:47 AM UTC
in
Therophy
nigga tha fuk is therophy
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Yeah... true for most/all of us.
Except Spectral. He was connecting to totse with semaphore and smoke signals before the internet even existed.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Laugh at the little pussy and stop feeding him until he beat his bully up.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by D4NG0
the earth is round
Miss me with that jedi shit.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
>my tomodachi
[Translator's note: tomodachi means friend, so I know you're lying.]
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-12-08 at 10:25 PM UTC
in
Are you actually racist or no?
Originally posted by Captain Falcon
No, I am not racist at heart. But everyone's racist outside at night.
How do you feel when a visibly Muslim person sits next to you on a plane?
PS: I'm not racist, I just find edgy racist humor funny and think niggers are predisposed to crime.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-12-04 at 10:16 PM UTC
in
This website is boring as fuck
Originally posted by LegalizeSpiritualDiscovery
It's supposed to go however the admin wants it to go.
Bootlicker.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Just use a bitcoin vending machine.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by LegalizeSpiritualDiscovery
Just about to be done with Cat's Cradle. Which book should I start next? Neuromancer, Dune, The I Ching, or World Without End (sequel to Pillars of the Earth)?
I'd personally recommend Neuromancer, but Dune is good.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by greenplastic
What? Are you implying I'm not white?
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by 霍比特人说中文不好
The scientific consensus is in support of the OOA theory. If you want to disagree you need to, you know, science.
I would like to point out that if you want to make a point on behalf of science, you need to... you know... science. Not just say "science says ____, so you're wrong". That's a Biblethumper-tier argument. I think we can all agree that there's nothing more embarrassing than a complete layperson arguing against "the truth", but this applies to complete laypeople arguing both for and against scientific consensus.
Post last edited by HTS at 2017-11-22T15:27:04.742810+00:00
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
God is dead but I still believe he'll come back to life.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Lanny
It's ironic then that these camps find themselves generally opposite in modern politics.
Do they though? Do they really?
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Helladamnleet
Him, he, his*
FTFY
Are shamu, free willy, and moby dick the appropriate pronouns for your wife?
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Captain Falcon
Baçkdoor Sluts 9
Is it Turkish?
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by WhiskeyPhoenix
Mash is going to try cock once and end up liking it so much that he converts to be fully gay.
Originally posted by mmQ
Not sure if insult or general observation.
Mash should convert already. Sucking dick is GRRR-RRRR-RRRR-eat!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by jedi.Goldstein
This is the sort of shit I could equally argue for or against, and convince the likes of §m£ÂgØL I was dead right either way.
Originally posted by HTS
I'm not saying if "what if he straight up offered to advance careers", I'm saying what if he just asked for money and the people present felt the implication was that their careers could stagnate if they didn't pony up? There's no specific point that you decide that sex can't possibly be uncoerced, but if people later say they felt coerced it isn't automatically invalidated because they ended up consenting to whatever they claim they felt coerced to do.
Listen and believe, shitlord. Or like, at least remember it's not necessarily that anyone's lying or being weak, and there's a chance that it's all just valid and conflicting feelings about something that happened. You don't have to mean to hurt someone to end up hurting someone etc. That's how it seems from Louis' response too - he didn't necessarily think it was going to make anyone uncomfortable, but he accepts that he did.
To put this in perspective §m£ÂgØL, imagine you went out with the CEO of a publishing company for drinks after a long day of writing and spent an entire evening talking about writing and where you saw your career as a writer heading and they invited you back to their place for drinks and then asked if they could masturbate in front of you/to you.
How would you take that request? I mean I'm reasonably sure you'd say no, but just being asked would feel coercive as fuck neh?
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by jedi.Goldstein
No.
You deserve to be strongly beaten for this post.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!