what age would you have to be

1. 2023-09-22 at 2:22 PM UTC

   #101
   

   Kawkasian African Astronaut

   Originally posted by RIPtotse the fuck are you even saying?
   
   things cost money?
   
   yes yes they do

   
   
   
   The graph is self explanatory...
2. 2023-09-22 at 2:25 PM UTC

   #102
   RIPtotse victim of incest [my adversative decurved garbo]
   ok you posted a graph showing nasa decrease in budget over the years
   
   ok? the fuck does that have to do with skynet ffs
3. 2023-09-22 at 2:27 PM UTC

   #103
   The Self Taught Man Black Hole
   NASA wastes all its money on gay ass "science" anyway.
4. 2023-09-22 at 2:29 PM UTC

   #104
   

   Kawkasian African Astronaut
   https://www.planetary.org/space-policy/nasas-fy-2020-budget
   
   Orion Crew Vehicle $1.4 billion
   Lunar Gateway $450 million
   Lunar Lander $600 million
   
   Welfare spending $212 billion.
5. 2023-09-22 at 2:30 PM UTC

   #105
   

   Kawkasian African Astronaut

   Originally posted by RIPtotse ok you posted a graph showing nasa decrease in budget over the years
   
   ok? the fuck does that have to do with skynet ffs

   
   Um nothing...did you miss the whole back and forth with ALDRA regarding why 50yrs later we "allegedly" don't have the tech to go back to the moon...THAT'S what my graph was about
   
   Spending on "going back to the moon" has been $0 since the 70s...THAT'S WHY. The tech hasn't been lost because the tech hasn't been developed (up until recently)...of course we wouldn't use 60s/70s tech to send a mission now...new tech has to be developed.
   
   wtf.
6. 2023-09-22 at 2:48 PM UTC

   #106
   

   aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition

   Originally posted by Kawkasian Um nothing…did you miss the whole back and forth with ALDRA regarding why 50yrs later we "allegedly" don't have the tech to go back to the moon…THAT'S what my graph was about
   
   Spending on "going back to the moon" has been $0 since the 70s…THAT'S WHY. The tech hasn't been lost because the tech hasn't been developed (up until recently)…of course we wouldn't use 60s/70s tech to send a mission now…new tech has to be developed.
   
   wtf.

   
   1. NASA isn't the only group concerned with space travel and hasn't been for a long time, in fact their reduced funding is largely a function of their increasing irrelevance
   
   2. the bulk of the spending on the space program back in the 70s and earlier was for hard-won data on things like required propulsion, gravity and orbits, radiation and the van allen belt etc. rather than actual production of hardware. if they haven't fucked up and lost that data it can be relatively easily integrated into new systems for much less.
   
   3. remember that hardcore autist that got bullied out of NASA for wearing a shirt with anime girls on it? he got replaced by a diversity hire. rinse, repeat forever. the woman who got credit for 'rendering the first image of a black hole from telescope telemetry', who wrote less than 5% of the codebase where one of her male coworkers contributed 80%? the movie about black women in the roles of literal human calculator singlehandedly carrying the space program on their backs (aside: I found it super funny that they included a scene where a man was trying to psych the black women up, saying they could do anything because he was a Polish J'ew who escaped the nazis and was now fighting for freedom... by working under the man who developed the V2 missile)?
   
   the problem isn't funding or technology, it's simple competence.
7. 2023-09-22 at 2:50 PM UTC

   #107
   

   Kawkasian African Astronaut

   Originally posted by aldra 1. NASA isn't the only group concerned with space travel and hasn't been for a long time, in fact their reduced funding is largely a function of their increasing irrelevance

   
   The private sector had 0 technology too.
   
   They didn't have any tech to "lose"...the only agency that possibly had tech to lose was NASA...hence my response.
   
   It wasn't lost tech, it was $0 financing...again, no one would think of using 60s tech to send a moon mission now for a whole host of reasons...new tech HAS to be developed.
   
   the assumption/argument that we "lost the tech" is pretty dumb.
8. 2023-09-22 at 6:31 PM UTC

   #108
   

   Chios Honey African Astronaut

   Originally posted by Kawkasian How much of that is budgeted to NASA…You can't build a (decent) garden shed with $10.
   
   stay in school kid.
   
   

   
   You can for 18k
   
   this is the night video the day video is better. if you have trees to place it between
   also I guess this includes the concrete slab. hard to believe. slab city has lots of built slabs no buildings but too many meth heads and tribal minded hippy fuckers policing it
   
   
9. 2023-09-22 at 6:55 PM UTC

   #109
   

   jerryb African Astronaut

   Originally posted by Kawkasian Computer navigation > human navigation.
   
   Just the facts ma'am

   
   Uh if the gov running the show they just shift the passing requirements until it is good. Been there done it.
10. 2023-09-22 at 6:55 PM UTC

    #110
    

    Kawkasian African Astronaut
    18K isn't $10 dummy
11. 2023-09-22 at 6:56 PM UTC

    #111
    

    Kawkasian African Astronaut

    Originally posted by jerryb Uh if the gov running the show they just shift the passing requirements until it is good. Been there done it.

    
    take your meds...you're "wariating"
12. 2023-09-22 at 7:02 PM UTC

    #112
    

    jerryb African Astronaut

    Originally posted by Kawkasian Fixed.

    
    This^ for sure and an entire 85% white country supporting it. Less welfar and fool skramps for the win.