User Controls
Woman 42 dead after being shot by Film's Prop
-
2021-10-23 at 10:48 PM UTC
-
2021-10-23 at 11:41 PM UTC
-
2021-10-23 at 11:55 PM UTC
Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready That's what acting is. it's not about being or becoming that you may love or hate. Your acting instructor may ask you "What's your favorite films". She or He isn't being nice and sociable. If you say Comedy they will say "Good, Here is" and hands you a cold read script from Drama or something non comedic.
hes also the producer.
he could have produced something else without guns in it. -
2021-10-24 at 12:03 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2021-10-24 at 4:16 AM UTC
-
2021-10-24 at 4:17 AM UTC
-
2021-10-24 at 8:50 AM UTC
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2021-10-24 at 1:13 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2021/10/23/baldwin-ignored-no-1-rule-of-gun-safety-hollywood-weapons-expert/amp/
the first rule that he ignored was letting a woman do a man's job of handling very potent phalus symbols she doesnt have. -
2021-10-24 at 6:13 PM UTCi like how the media is gung-ho after an accidental shooting instead of the fucking nigger who went on a high school campus and intentionally shot people and then miraculously got bond
-
2021-10-24 at 6:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by STER0S i like how the media is gung-ho after an accidental shooting instead of the fucking nigger who went on a high school campus and intentionally shot people and then miraculously got bond
Speaking of, here is a development in that story I am sure the legacy media won't spend any time on.
-
2021-10-24 at 10:47 PM UTC
-
2021-10-25 at 1:29 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra why does a blank even need paper wadding? can't you just have one sheet or a piece of wax or something covering the hole where the bullet would fit?
For safety reasons to ensure no powder is able to leak from the rounds while being shipped or stored. If you imagine a box of 100 rounds, with the way blanks are crimped leaving slight gaps, fine powder could easily escape. If a touch of powder escaped from say twenty or thirty rounds it could collect together in the bottom of the box causing a lethal accident. Wax would be too brittle and could easily break off. Besides a chunk of wax being ejected at high velocity could also be lethal.
. -
2021-10-25 at 1:37 AM UTC
-
2021-10-25 at 1:55 AM UTC
Originally posted by Quick Mix Ready I wonder if this that deep-fake software or something more simpler like easy-talk.
I am not sure but I just asked in the comment section of the video. If the creator answers I will try to remember to post it here.
Originally posted by Narc For safety reasons to ensure no powder is able to leak from the rounds while being shipped or stored. If you imagine a box of 100 rounds, with the way blanks are crimped leaving slight gaps, fine powder could easily escape. If a touch of powder escaped from say twenty or thirty rounds it could collect together in the bottom of the box causing a lethal accident. Wax would be too brittle and could easily break off. Besides a chunk of wax being ejected at high velocity could also be lethal.
.
Yes sir, in fact in the early 1900's the custom of pistol dueling was briefly resurrected as a non-lethal sport by using wax bullets. These bullets were .44 caliber and did not have a powder charge in the casing as the was bullets were light enough to travel at around 450 feet per second with only the primer. There is no way of easily knowing how fast they would have traveled with a full charge. But I don't believe you would want to be shot with it. -
2021-10-25 at 1:57 AM UTC
Originally posted by Meikai I agree that his actions were negligent, especially for someone who seems generally fearful of firearms. A reasonable person must assume every firearm is loaded, but it's the set armorer's job to ensure that isn't the case when it reaches the hands of an actor. Firing a gun towards the camera for a shot may necessitate aiming the gun toward other people (which is what I suspect happened, since he tagged the cinematographer and director). It's not murder. At worst, negligent homicide. Words have meanings.
I understand the armourer was very inexperienced on that set. Saying that, even if he'd only had ten minutes of weapons training the first thing he shoulda been taught would have been to check any weapon that is handed to you or you picked up. I had military training with weapons and its drilled into you to open the chamber and to look and physically feel for anything in the breach, then you point the weapon down, cock it and release the firing mechanism while its aimed down. Even if you just watched the guy who handed it to you do it, you still check again for rounds in the chamber. Its surprising how often ammo gets left in a weapon and is not realised. I'm pretty sure actors are supposed to be given similar training if they are going to do a role using weapons. Especially if the role involves firing blanks or live ammo of any sort.
. -
2021-10-25 at 2:02 AM UTC
Originally posted by Narc I understand the armourer was very inexperienced on that set. Saying that, even if he'd only had ten minutes of weapons training the first thing he shoulda been taught would have been to check any weapon that is handed to you or you picked up.
.
Even with that there is no reason for a live round to be on the set or in the prop departments possession. That is something I have not heard addressed in any report on this. Who brought a live round to location and why did they bring it? -
2021-10-25 at 2:08 AM UTC
-
2021-10-25 at 3:07 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2021-10-25 at 3:09 AM UTC
-
2021-10-25 at 4:21 AM UTC
