User Controls

Ohio shooting

  1. park police Tuskegee Airman
    Well I live in Military City USA, and I have definitely seen almost completely silent helicopters a few times. Seen a b2 spirit also. Everywhere you go in this city you're surrounded by military bases, spooks from intelligence agencies, and feds. You see all kinds of shit here if you pay attention at the right times of day or night.

    EDIT: You know it's weird when you see a helicopter hovering not too far above you, and you can barely hear anything. Maybe a slight hum, but you'll have to be looking for it.
  2. iam_asiam68 African Astronaut
    the obvious question that should be asked in this recent Ohio shooting should be, do you think the brother disliked his sister?

    or hated his sister?
  3. Rear Naked Joke African Astronaut
    Americans don't deserve semi automatic rifles and shotguns.

    For firearm manufacturers, the sale of any new firearms to civilian distributors except (semi auto) handguns and single shot rifles and shotguns should be prohibited from some future date, with about a ~12 month grace period to settle existing arrangements and ~3 months for any new business after the order to clear inventory without replenishment after the order. Then out a phat tax on the sale of all new firearms.

    The existing firearms of these types will become limited in the USA, and their resale value will increase over time, including probably a massive spike right at the start. Collectors and hoarders will stash lots of these guns away and they won't sell them to just anybody, specially not some angsty little shit ass 8chin teen who probably can't even make conversation.

    Semi auto handguns are most commonly used for personal defence, single sjot shotguns are commonly used for home defence and hunting, and single shot rifles are mostly used for hunting. All three are also used for recreation and are awesome.

    Single shot rifles would not be very effective at committing a mass shooting. And I haven't heard of anyone using a single shot shotgun for any sort of mass killing, I guess it's possible but it would be extremely cumbersome by comparison to a semi auto.

    It's possible to mod guns to be semi auto but again. I really doubt the 4chinners are going to make the effort. They will just opt for a handgun instead.

    At that point... Lots of people have handguns in America. Now they won't be a guy with a rifle, they'll just be another punk with a pistol.
  4. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    In the video I posted above, helicopters are recorded on radar going out, and then backtracking, and then turning their transponders off at the exact location of the Mandalay Bay hotel, and in the captured video, that exact section of the field shows helicopters hovering and muzzle flashes coming from one of them. That jives exactly with the audio analyses done by the Health Ranger. What more does a person need for direct evidence? You need the killers to walk up and hand you signed confessions before you will believe this mass murder was staged by the US government and the US military?
  5. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny this is just a regular, non stealth heli.

  6. Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    It's obvious the Mandalay Bay shooting would either not have happened or would have been far less lethal to an extreme degree if he had to use a handgun or single shot rifle.
  7. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by -SpectraL In the Pulse shooting, a mysterious woman ran into the club just before the shooting, yelling for everyone to get out, that they were all going to die. One survivor also recounted how security left the back door open when it was always closed, and how the security guard stepped out that same door just seconds before the shooting started.

    Didnt this also happen at the Vegas shooting? I wonder if it was the same woman?? 🧐
  8. Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    Screaming lady is Keyser Soze.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  9. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    And a lot of people are so uneducated and ignorant they don't even know it wasn't only the Mandala Bay Hotel where there were shots. Three other major hotels in the immediate vicinity were also shot at from the outside, information which the mainstream media hid, in a sequential timeline leading away from the Mandala Bay hotel, indicting a gunman or group of gunmen were fleeing the area but firing at hotels as they went.
  10. Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country Dark Matter [my scoffingly uncritical tinning]
    Originally posted by Common De-mominator It's obvious the Mandalay Bay shooting would either not have happened or would have been far less lethal to an extreme degree if he had to use a handgun or single shot rifle.

    It would have been even less lethal had he just thrown rocks.

    Kind of an obvious insight.
  11. Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country It would have been even less lethal had he just thrown rocks.

    Kind of an obvious insight.

    Does that make it less true?

    You missed the obvious criticism that I left for you, which was that the Mandalay Bay guy was pretty wealthy and had a shit load of guns, and under my system he probably would have legally obtained the guns anyway.
  12. Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country Dark Matter [my scoffingly uncritical tinning]
    Originally posted by Common De-mominator under my system

    k
  13. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    So its commonly accepted that there was just the one shooter there ? Even though spectral and many others have demonstrated there were shots coming from multiple areas?
  14. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by mmQ So its commonly accepted that there was just the one shooter there ? Even though spectral and many others have demonstrated there were shots coming from multiple areas?

    People just gobble up the official narrative and then fight other people who question it, in order to support and reinforce the lie. Things are way easier that way for them. Otherwise, they would actually have to take responsibility and action, knowing what they know. So they deliberately choose not to know and just rely on Big Brother to create their reality for them. Very easy. No work involved. Back to TV and video games and their cell phones.
  15. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by -SpectraL People just gobble up the official narrative and then fight other people who question it, in order to support and reinforce the lie. Things are way easier that way for them. Otherwise, they would actually have to take responsibility and action, knowing what they know. So they deliberately choose not to know and just rely on Big Brother to create their reality for them. Very easy. No work involved. Back to TV and video games and their cell phones.

    I mean it's one thing to "gobble up the official narrative " and its another thing to automatically "ungobble" it up for the sake of ungobbling. Every scenario should be addressed on a case by case basis. Sometimes things happen that in fact do happen the way the media portrays it.

    In the case of the Mandalay bayshooting, it's quite apparent that there is way more than what meets the eye. Literal physical evidence has been shown that demonstrates there were shots coming from multiple areas. I guess it doesn't REALLY matter either way, as in, if it was confirmed there was a second or third shooter, people would probably just shrug and say "oh, ok" .
  16. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by mmQ I mean it's one thing to "gobble up the official narrative " and its another thing to automatically "ungobble" it up for the sake of ungobbling. Every scenario should be addressed on a case by case basis. Sometimes things happen that in fact do happen the way the media portrays it.

    In the case of the Mandalay bayshooting, it's quite apparent that there is way more than what meets the eye. Literal physical evidence has been shown that demonstrates there were shots coming from multiple areas. I guess it doesn't REALLY matter either way, as in, if it was confirmed there was a second or third shooter, people would probably just shrug and say "oh, ok" .

    But the real issue isn't how many shooters there were, it's how many the government insisted there was. Obviously, they already know there were more than one, and yet they insist there was only a single shooter. The issue really is, why would they do that? And the only obvious answer is that it's because they are the ones doing the shootings.
  17. Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country k

    ?
  18. Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    Originally posted by mmQ So its commonly accepted that there was just the one shooter there ? Even though spectral and many others have demonstrated there were shots coming from multiple areas?

    Yup there was only one shooter
  19. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Common De-mominator Yup there was only one shooter

    In the face of all direct evidence to the contrary, only a willful, deliberate idiot would think that.
  20. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    A ballistics EXPERT demonstrated how there HAD to have been shots from multiple areas. Most people interviewed seem to support this.
Jump to Top