User Controls

Ohio shooting

  1. G4LM African Astronaut
    Is SpectraL sayin sum dumb shit hehe
  2. Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    Like literally, who knows how long each time took to TRAVEL TO YOU. just the delay between the two.

    Even forget s triangle, just think of a line.

    Imagine someone shooting in your direction. They start by shooting straight down at the ground. Then raising the angle up gradually, up, up, up, till they are shooting near your feet. Depending on the angle, the bullet will impact the ground after a different amount of time relative to the initial shot because it has to travel a longer distance.

    Now add a second dimension to it. Delendong on where the shooter is standing and where the bullet hits, you can generate the same delay with an infinite combination of angle + distance.
  3. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Common De-mominator No, they won't. Are you mentally defective? It has to travel different lengths of time depending on the position of two points and the mic. Literally imagine a triangle.

    Think of the higher frequency sound as Sound A. The lower frequency sound as Sound B. Put Sound A and Sound B as two points on a time chart. Now minus the time of Sound A from the time of Sound B and get the time difference between the two. Whatever that number is represents the delay between the two points. Once you have the lag difference, that's all you need to calculate the actual distance, when also comparing to characteristics/limitations/behavior of the bullets being fired.
  4. Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Once you have the lag difference, that's all you need to calculate the actual distance, when also comparing to characteristics/limitations/behavior of the bullets being fired.
    Nnnnno buddy. Not with one mic.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    All this time we could have been capturing full positional audio with just in mic, why didn't the retards in engineering ever ask Spectral
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  6. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Common De-mominator Nnnnno buddy. Not with one mic.

    You only need one mic to hear both Sound A and Sound B.
  7. Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    Originally posted by -SpectraL You only need one mic to hear both Sound A and Sound B.

    Through one microphone, the sources of Sound A and B could have any number of properties and relations.
  8. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Common De-mominator Through one microphone, the sources of Sound A and B could have any number of properties and relations.

    No, they can't, because there are only two sounds. One high, one low. It is quite distinguishable from the single microphone.
  9. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Has there been a response video to the ballistics guy video? Has one person refuted what hes saying other than falco?
  10. Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    Originally posted by -SpectraL No, they can't, because there are only two sounds. One high, one low. It is quite distinguishable from the single microphone.

    Those two sounds could be coming from any distance and angle that corresoonds to the same effective delay.
  11. G4LM African Astronaut
    Originally posted by mmQ Has there been a response video to the ballistics guy video? Has one person refuted what hes saying other than falco?

    The rest of the sane world?
  12. Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    Googled around a bit and found this video. Very few views but the debunk is solid.

    The kid takes a different angle than me but the idea is the same: you can produce the same data with a number of combinations of equipment.

    And Paddock literally had a small arsenal, I'm guessing yeah, he did us EA couple of different types of guns and ammo at least
  13. Originally posted by -SpectraL In the video I posted above, helicopters are recorded on radar going out, and then backtracking, and then turning their transponders off at the exact location of the Mandalay Bay hotel, and in the captured video, that exact section of the field shows helicopters hovering and muzzle flashes coming from one of them. That jives exactly with the audio analyses done by the Health Ranger. What more does a person need for direct evidence? You need the killers to walk up and hand you signed confessions before you will believe this mass murder was staged by the US government and the US military?

    why not even a single rotor swish was captured in the sound analysis ?

    was the heli observed a known stealth heli ?
  14. Originally posted by -SpectraL

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xH0mn0rV848
  15. Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    Lol forgot to link vid

    Originally posted by Common De-mominator Googled around a bit and found this video. Very few views but the debunk is solid.

    The kid takes a different angle than me but the idea is the same: you can produce the same data with a number of combinations of equipment.

    And Paddock literally had a small arsenal, I'm guessing yeah, he did us EA couple of different types of guns and ammo at least

  16. Originally posted by -SpectraL

    I asked for evidence of an FBI stealth helicopter...and you post a youtube which in no way supports the claim of an FBI stealth helicopter...lolol
  17. Originally posted by Common De-mominator Like literally, who knows how long each time took to TRAVEL TO YOU. just the delay between the two.

    Even forget s triangle, just think of a line.

    Imagine someone shooting in your direction. They start by shooting straight down at the ground. Then raising the angle up gradually, up, up, up, till they are shooting near your feet. Depending on the angle, the bullet will impact the ground after a different amount of time relative to the initial shot because it has to travel a longer distance.

    Now add a second dimension to it. Delendong on where the shooter is standing and where the bullet hits, you can generate the same delay with an infinite combination of angle + distance.

    the thing is that according to his audio analysis there are two bursts of equally consistent shots, set a and set b instead of a gradual increase or decrease between the time the bullets hit the floor and shots heard.

    and the direction of the second shooter was determined by by guessing / speculating the most likely place a secind shooter can shoot from relative to paddock's location.

    so if paddock was shooting from 500 yards from the concert floor, then there can be only a few other places that is 300 yards away from the concert floor that can give the second shooter the vantage point needed to produce more or less the same shot pattern as paddock.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  18. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny rd.

    and the direction of the second shooter was determined by guessing / speculating

    /snip and so completely worthless as evidence of anything.
  19. Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson /snip and so completely worthless as evidence of anything.

    yea, the whole point isnt/wasnt to pinpoint the location of the 2nd shooter,

    but to rationally presents the very likely existence of a second shooter.
  20. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Common De-mominator And Paddock literally had a small arsenal, I'm guessing yeah, he did us EA couple of different types of guns and ammo at least

    he had like 20 of what I believe were the same platform, though I don't think the list of weapons was ever officially released.

    it's been a long time since I watched the video so I'll skim it again before I comment further.

    introducing a 'stealth helicopter' just makes the idea of multiple shooters seem more ridiculous so good job spec
Jump to Top