Ohio shooting

1. 2019-08-06 at 4:12 AM UTC

   #181
   

   aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition

   Originally posted by -SpectraL

   
   there were only like 2-3 scenarios I could think of that would explain this away and none of them were terribly plausible.
   
   the entire 'happening' made very little sense
2. 2019-08-06 at 5:03 AM UTC

   #182
   

   -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]

   Originally posted by aldra there were only like 2-3 scenarios I could think of that would explain this away and none of them were terribly plausible.
   
   the entire 'happening' made very little sense

   
   Suppose there exist two explanations for an occurrence. In this case the one that requires the least speculation is usually correct. Another way of saying it is that the more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation.
3. 2019-08-06 at 5:11 AM UTC

   #183
   

   vindicktive vinny Black Hole

   Originally posted by Common De-mominator So are major American media networks.
   
   
   
   No.

   
   1- no.
   
   2- nein.
   
   
   
   

   Originally posted by Common De-mominator Rectangular*

   
   elongated squares.
4. 2019-08-06 at 5:12 AM UTC

   #184
   

   vindicktive vinny Black Hole

   Originally posted by Common De-mominator I know. Once upon a time when you were a chubby kid with a white computer screen in your face, you looked like that.

   
   until his mom got him a dell.
5. 2019-08-06 at 5:14 AM UTC

   #185
   

   vindicktive vinny Black Hole

   Originally posted by -SpectraL Suppose there exist two explanations for an occurrence. In this case the one that requires the least speculation is usually correct. Another way of saying it is that the more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation.

   
   the fuck is a "health ranger" anyway.
6. 2019-08-06 at 5:26 AM UTC

   #186
   

   aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition

   Originally posted by -SpectraL Suppose there exist two explanations for an occurrence. In this case the one that requires the least speculation is usually correct. Another way of saying it is that the more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation.

   
   don't be a shit. I was agreeing that the official story was most likely nonsense for a number of reasons.
7. 2019-08-06 at 5:42 AM UTC

   #187
   

   -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]

   Originally posted by aldra don't be a shit. I was agreeing that the official story was most likely nonsense for a number of reasons.

   
   I was merely reinforcing my original premise, not referring to that good post. But how can you say "most likely"? That's like saying two plus two is most likely four.
8. 2019-08-06 at 5:47 AM UTC

   #188
   

   -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]

   Originally posted by vindicktive vinny the fuck is a "health ranger" anyway.

   
   His online handle is Health Ranger. His real name is Mike Adams. "The Health Ranger" is a fearless consumer advocate, award winning investigative journalist, Internet activist, and science lab director.
9. 2019-08-06 at 6:10 AM UTC

   #189
   

   aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition

   Originally posted by -SpectraL I was merely reinforcing my original premise, not referring to that good post. But how can you say "most likely"? That's like saying two plus two is most likely four.

   
   claiming certainty is for people who don't understand the limits of their knowlwdge
10. 2019-08-06 at 6:17 AM UTC

    #190
    

    vindicktive vinny Black Hole

    Originally posted by aldra claiming certainty is for people who don't understand the limits of their knowlwdge

    
    if you dont know what you dont know,
    
    then you know everything that you know.
11. 2019-08-06 at 6:17 AM UTC

    #191
    

    vindicktive vinny Black Hole

    Originally posted by -SpectraL His online handle is Health Ranger. His real name is Mike Adams. "The Health Ranger" is a fearless consumer advocate, award winning investigative journalist, Internet activist, and science lab director.

    
    what does "ranger" have anythimg to do with all that >?
12. 2019-08-06 at 9:08 AM UTC

    #192
    

    Common De-mominator African Astronaut

    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny 1- no.
    
    2- nein.
    
    
    
    
    
    elongated squares.

    
    Incorrect, wrong and dead wrong.
13. 2019-08-06 at 3:31 PM UTC

    #193
    

    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]

    Originally posted by aldra claiming certainty is for people who don't understand the limits of their knowlwdge

    
    But some things ARE a certainty.
14. 2019-08-06 at 4:29 PM UTC

    #194
    

    aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition

    Originally posted by -SpectraL But some things ARE a certainty.

    
    of course the official story is not entirely true, but not necessarily through malice or deception.
    
    the general gist, that it was planned and performed as a one man show, is still possible though I consider it extremely unlikely
15. 2019-08-06 at 6:44 PM UTC

    #195
    

    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]

    Originally posted by aldra of course the official story is not entirely true, but not necessarily through malice or deception.
    
    the general gist, that it was planned and performed as a one man show, is still possible though I consider it extremely unlikely

    
    How can it be "possible", when the audio analysis proves 100% there were two reports occurring simultaneously? Numbers don't lie. There is no explanation for it, except that there were at least two shooters.
16. 2019-08-06 at 6:48 PM UTC

    #196
    

    vindicktive vinny Black Hole

    Originally posted by -SpectraL How can it be "possible", when the audio analysis proves 100% there were two reports occurring simultaneously? Numbers don't lie. There is no explanation for it, except that there were at least two shooters.

    
    audio analysis by "independent" experts.
    
    yes.
17. 2019-08-06 at 6:50 PM UTC

    #197
    

    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]

    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny audio analysis by "independent" experts.
    
    yes.

    
    But anyone can do the exact same analyses. All they need is a piece of paper and a pencil and the audio recordings and a free audio analyser. Everyone would come to the exact same conclusion.
18. 2019-08-06 at 7:17 PM UTC

    #198
    

    vindicktive vinny Black Hole

    Originally posted by -SpectraL But anyone can do the exact same analyses. All they need is a piece of paper and a pencil and the audio recordings and a free audio analyser. Everyone would come to the exact same conclusion.

    
    there in lies the unreliability.
    
    free audio analyzers are not credible data processors.
19. 2019-08-06 at 8:03 PM UTC

    #199
    

    Common De-mominator African Astronaut

    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny there in lies the unreliability.
    
    free audio analyzers are not credible data processors.

    
    How much dollars is the credibility cost
20. 2019-08-06 at 9:23 PM UTC

    #200
    

    -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]

    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny there in lies the unreliability.
    
    free audio analyzers are not credible data processors.

    
    It only needs to be able to analyse the frequency.