User Controls

ASSANGE TO GET FUCKED LIVESTREAM

  1. Originally posted by Krow He should of vetted the info on locations of troops..

    so they can continue to bomb schools and hospitals full of brown children unabated ?
  2. Krow African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Narc No

    He was already took out this morning by pigs sporting a mash style neckbeard and shouting "UK must resist".

    I'm surprised you ain't heard.


    .

    Just saw on youtube like 10 minutes ago. Yeah, it's a trip. I think what he did about exposing troops location was a bad thing. he hacked a government facility or the people who came to him had did so, making this stolen government property that he became in possession of?

    I don't know laws. I'm just going by what I heard from others. but they're all lego lawyers.

    some of the stuff was trippy. I read stuff about UFO and the Free Energy thing by Dr Edgar Mitchell (6th astronaut on the moon) to Podesta

    free form of energy that was given by Aliens to the US Government. this is when I thought, I can believe this yet it's just there .. in front of me. it must be some weird shell game.

    and other shit, like Hillary's comments about the emails.

    is it real or is this some kind of sideshow fake news thing?
  3. Narc Space Nigga [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    See my previous post:

    Originally posted by Narc Exactly. This whole assange episode is just a slight of hand illusionists trick to take everybody's eye off the ball of who the real wrongdoers are. Get everybody so hyped up on what a monster assange is so people don't notice the fact that the elite fucks took a shit load of people into wars that should never have happened, that the reasons they took us into those wars were bullshit.

    They talk about wikileaks putting troops in danger by revealing their locations. But those troops should never have been there in the first place. Who put them there, thats the real elephant in the room.


    .
  4. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Common De-mominator Being hacked doesn't mean something becomes public domain lmao.

    I beg to differ. If it's in the wild, that's the public domain.
  5. Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    Originally posted by -SpectraL I beg to differ. If it's in the wild, that's the public domain.

    It's not in the wild, it's in a cage that was stolen and has not been opened yet. Wikileaks opens the door.
  6. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Common De-mominator It's not in the wild, it's in a cage that was stolen and has not been opened yet. Wikileaks opens the door.

    There was no cage. Stop making shit up. The hacker could have posted it anywhere. Why isn't the Washington Post publishers under arrest for publishing classified information? Why are they so special?
  7. Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by Common De-mominator Would you accept this justification from a murderer?

    We accept killing in self defense as generally legitimate, at least if lethal force is threatened. So pretty much yeah, "someone is going to die, it should probably be the aggressor" doesn't seem unreasonable to me.

    Originally posted by Krow I am being a whistle blower .. I'm just saying it's wrong to expose locations of allied troops. Just delay story then release it when they relocated .. that form of redaction is saving troops lives.. the redaction of 28 pages in a 9/11 attack is Manipulation of power


    Again, why? Why are the lives of American troops that are jeopardized by a disclosure like that worth more than the lives of the people they're hired to kill who we can reasonably expect to be saved? Like it seems to me war is pretty close to a zero sum game, at least if we're counting soldier lives.
  8. Narc Space Nigga [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    I've already explained it ffs.


    .
  9. Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Lanny We accept killing in self defense as generally legitimate, at least if lethal force is threatened. So pretty much yeah, "someone is going to die, it should probably be the aggressor" doesn't seem unreasonable to me.

    How is leaking operational details "self defense"?


  10. Originally posted by Lanny So pretty much yeah, "someone is going to die, it should always be the aggressor" is the only logical maxim.

    assertified.
  11. Krow African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Lanny We accept killing in self defense as generally legitimate, at least if lethal force is threatened. So pretty much yeah, "someone is going to die, it should probably be the aggressor" doesn't seem unreasonable to me.




    Again, why? Why are the lives of American troops that are jeopardized by a disclosure like that worth more than the lives of the people they're hired to kill who we can reasonably expect to be saved? Like it seems to me war is pretty close to a zero sum game, at least if we're counting soldier lives.

    I stated if you feel it's best not to disclose the location of Axis as well. that is fair.

    Besides it was the Governments documents he got hold of so not disclosing the Axis wouldn't matter. It has to do with you being apart of the country you live in as not being a treasonous. and he's from the UK so the UK soldiers were also there. That could be seen as a treasonous act. Not intentional probably but they still didn't like the fact he stole the Governments property. we can argue this all day long. don't disclose any troops location publicly. Axis or Allied.
  12. Narc Space Nigga [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    Originally posted by Krow I stated if you feel it's best not to disclose the location of Axis as well. that is fair.

    Besides it was the Governments documents he got hold of so not disclosing the Axis wouldn't matter. It has to do with you being apart of the country you live in as not being a treasonous. and he's from the UK so the UK soldiers were also there. That could be seen as a treasonous act. Not intentional probably but they still didn't like the fact he stole the Governments property. we can argue this all day long. don't disclose any troops location publicly. Axis or Allied.

    Oh the irony


    .
  13. Narc Space Nigga [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny assertified.

    Assangified


    .
  14. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Yeah, the aggressor is the one who decided to commit the investment.
  15. Narc Space Nigga [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    Originally posted by Krow I stated if you feel it's best not to disclose the location of Axis as well. that is fair.

    Besides it was the Governments documents he got hold of so not disclosing the Axis wouldn't matter. It has to do with you being apart of the country you live in as not being a treasonous. and he's from the UK so the UK soldiers were also there. That could be seen as a treasonous act. Not intentional probably but they still didn't like the fact he stole the Governments property. we can argue this all day long. don't disclose any troops location publicly. Axis or Allied.

    Also assange is an Ozzy BTW.


    .
  16. Narc Space Nigga [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    I mean as treason goes they might just as well pick up an Isis recce patrol and charge them with treason after they radio back the us troops location in Syria. Thats as much equivalent to treason as assange has committed against the us.


    .
  17. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Without Assange's publications, we wouldn't even have know about any of Crooked Hillary's felonies and high crimes, and we wouldn't know about the deep state's high crimes either. We wouldn't know about the torture, or the illegal uranium deal to the Russians or any of a number of other high-level crimes by the US government.
  18. Octavian motherfucker
    Assange will be soon forgotton about. Egocentric dick head he is.
  19. Narc Space Nigga [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    Its not about whether he's a dick or not. If it can happen to him they can do this to any of us. Don't you get it? Its not OK just as long as they're only targeting a dick head. In fact this is the reaction they're hoping for from the sheep. The media has prolly got you thinking he's more of a dick than he even is. I mean think about it, you've never met the guy, never spoken to him. Your whole impression of him is based on info thats come to you via some media source. This is what the media do for fuck sake, they distort the information before they deliver it to you. Ffs wake tf up man.


    .
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
Jump to Top