User Controls
ASSANGE TO GET FUCKED LIVESTREAM
-
2019-04-09 at 5:08 PM UTC
-
2019-04-09 at 5:10 PM UTC
-
2019-04-09 at 5:51 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny says who ?
the funding? I just remember reading the government funded it but not the majority so they don't have corporate control.
Originally posted by Common De-mominator It was reported originally by Wikileaks
yeah, came from 'embassy sources' and several papers apparently got the same tip -
2019-04-09 at 5:54 PM UTC
-
2019-04-09 at 5:59 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra the funding? I just remember reading the government funded it but not the majority so they don't have corporate control.
nah. i do belive its completely, 100%ly russian government funded with the aid of creative accountings. its a russian goverments global PR unit.
i respect your opinion but i seriously think your have a severe case of russophillia and chronic RT-titis. -
2019-04-09 at 6 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny nah. i do belive its completely, 100%ly russian government funded with the aid of creative accountings. its a russian goverments global PR unit.
i respect your opinion but i seriously think your have a severe case of russophillia and chronic RT-titis.
But they regularly criticize Russian authorities. -
2019-04-09 at 6 PM UTC
-
2019-04-09 at 6:10 PM UTC
-
2019-04-09 at 6:25 PM UTC
-
2019-04-09 at 8:37 PM UTC
-
2019-04-10 at 4:31 AM UTC
-
2019-04-10 at 4:32 AM UTCThe only thing he did bad really was expose where troops were, he should of not did that. other shit was pretty eye opening, but then again, it could be just a giant ass staged show
-
2019-04-10 at 5:17 AM UTC
Originally posted by Krow The only thing he did bad really was expose where troops were, he should of not did that.
Why? I don't understand ostensibly anti-war dems that act like disclosing military secrets is somehow inexcusable. Like we agree that our various wars are wrong, so why is taking action against the US military somehow beyond the pale? What is the correct thing to do here? Complain about war endlessly while doing nothing to impede the military efficacy of our country because the troops are magically innocent somehow? -
2019-04-10 at 5:54 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Why? I don't understand ostensibly anti-war dems that act like disclosing military secrets is somehow inexcusable. Like we agree that our various wars are wrong, so why is taking action against the US military somehow beyond the pale? What is the correct thing to do here? Complain about war endlessly while doing nothing to impede the military efficacy of our country because the troops are magically innocent somehow?
Fucking Wut???????
how does that even follow? -
2019-04-10 at 7:58 AM UTC
-
2019-04-10 at 9:30 AM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny i respect your opinion but i seriously think your have a severe case of russophillia and chronic RT-titis.
I mean, as opposed to what? for all the constant hype, I've found RT to be the most accurate (verifiable, doesn't rely on anonymous political sources or think tanks) major news site I've come across. I've asked you before if you've ever seen them publish something inaccurate, and the only thing you claimed was the scale of the ZAPAD drills - they simply reported the numbers given by the Russian government, while every other news outlet claimed those numbers were inaccurate without providing any evidence. -
2019-04-10 at 11:21 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Why? I don't understand ostensibly anti-war dems that act like disclosing military secrets is somehow inexcusable. Like we agree that our various wars are wrong, so why is taking action against the US military somehow beyond the pale? What is the correct thing to do here? Complain about war endlessly while doing nothing to impede the military efficacy of our country because the troops are magically innocent somehow?
What if it could lead to soldiers who are currently active and on the field being exposed, hurt or killed? -
2019-04-10 at 12:08 PM UTC
Originally posted by Common De-mominator What if it could lead to soldiers who are currently active and on the field being exposed, hurt or killed?
That’s what they signed up for, that’s why they’re getting combat pay. Half of them just sign up because they want an excuse to kill brown people legally anyways. If I go outside and start a fight with someone I’m accepting that there’s a possibility I’ll lose or maybe even die, which is why I don’t do it. People who enlist know what to expect and accept the risks (or don’t, but that’s they’re personal problem)The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-04-10 at 12:12 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Why? I don't understand ostensibly anti-war dems that act like disclosing military secrets is somehow inexcusable. Like we agree that our various wars are wrong, so why is taking action against the US military somehow beyond the pale? What is the correct thing to do here? Complain about war endlessly while doing nothing to impede the military efficacy of our country because the troops are magically innocent somehow?
it's dangerous to normalise undermining military operations for political goals - it would severely damage morale and enlistment rates, and would make the military an unreliable tool in general.
it might make sense if these 'anti war' groups sought complete disarmament and disbandment of the military, but for the most part they still want the military to be a useful tool/institution when they eventually take power. -
2019-04-10 at 12:21 PM UTC
