User Controls
What do you do when people tailgate you?
-
2019-07-11 at 7:30 PM UTC
-
2019-07-11 at 7:35 PM UTCmost nocturnal animals evolved that way when living in very hot climates like desserts. then they migrated to cooler climates and stayed that way.
btw, owls have extraordinary good hearing which they also employ to make them very skilled hunters.
. -
2019-07-11 at 7:39 PM UTCmmmmmmmHotDesserts
-
2019-07-11 at 7:41 PM UTC
-
2019-07-11 at 7:43 PM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist most nocturnal animals evolved that way when living in very hot climates like desserts. then they migrated to cooler climates and stayed that way.
btw, owls have extraordinary good hearing which they also employ to make them very skilled hunters.
.
owls are not very good hunter.
thats why they only hunt animals that are in abundance. -
2019-07-11 at 7:44 PM UTC
-
2019-07-11 at 7:46 PM UTC
-
2019-07-11 at 7:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny owls are not very good hunter.
thats why they only hunt animals that are in abundance.
you really do say the stupidest things bennt.
they're great hunters. just like all successful animals they've evolved to take best advantage of the environment they live in. evolution favors those that do, those that don't become extinct.
. -
2019-07-11 at 7:48 PM UTC
-
2019-07-11 at 7:50 PM UTCI wonder what the criteria and formula is for separating good vs bad hunters. Maybe you could say everything that is extinct or endangered are the poorest and whatever predatory animal there is the most of in the world is the greatest.
You could factor in death rate per 100 or how many successful kills per day per animal capita, but then youd have to figure out animal's individual digestion rates and their association with how often a particular animal needs to even hunt , like snakes or whatever that can eat one big meal and be good to go for months. Maybe snakes are the best hunters for that reason. -
2019-07-11 at 7:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist 2 to 5x, they have 20/4 vision. human standard is 20/20 but many people achieve 20/10 or even 20/8.
.
True. I think it's closer to 8x if you go by the TRUE normal of most humans which is probably closer to 30/20. The page I just looked at said only about 35% have 20/20 or better. -
2019-07-11 at 7:55 PM UTCman has caused many extinctions through over hunting. but then other species have gone extinct just because their natural food source went extinct, often because they were too good at hunting also.
animals usually thrive when there is an abundance of their natural food source. but this can then cause an imbalance enabling so many of that species to breed that they then overtake the food source causing their own extinction. their own success leads to their own extinction.
. -
2019-07-11 at 7:57 PM UTCAnd also good hunters could also be bad..avoiders, for lack of a better term. Just because you're excellent at hunting food doesn't mean you dont suck at being hunted as food. That should be factored in.
-
2019-07-11 at 7:59 PM UTCdid i mention vindictive bennt is a fucking idiot?
. -
2019-07-11 at 8:05 PM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist you really do say the stupidest things bennt.
they're great hunters. just like all successful animals they've evolved to take best advantage of the environment they live in. evolution favors those that do, those that don't become extinct.
.
just because they're good at procuring foods doesnt make them good hunters.
their success rate of hunting rats is like 1 out of every 10 attempts, but because theres an a bundance of rats, they can try hunting them all night long and get like 5 rats after 50 attempts.
sure they thrives, doesnt make them a good hunter. -
2019-07-11 at 8:29 PM UTC
-
2019-07-11 at 8:33 PM UTCEyes facing forward is mostly for primates, 3d vision is needed for tool manipulation. Chickens don't tend to need 3d vision as they have no interest in carpentry or rubix cubes.
-
2019-07-11 at 9:50 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny just because they're good at procuring foods doesnt make them good hunters.
their success rate of hunting rats is like 1 out of every 10 attempts, but because theres an a bundance of rats, they can try hunting them all night long and get like 5 rats after 50 attempts.
sure they thrives, doesnt make them a good hunter.
1 in 10 kill rate is actually good, quite a lot of humans would struggle to maintain that even with a rifle, lol.
if you compare to what is considered one of the worlds apex predators, the tiger, which only has a 1 in 20 kill rate, the owl looks like a fucking pro.
. -
2019-07-11 at 9:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist 1 in 10 kill rate is actually good, quite a lot of humans would struggle to maintain that even with a rifle, lol.
if you compare to what is considered one of the worlds apex predators, the tiger, which only has a 1 in 20 kill rate, the owl looks like a fucking pro.
.
I wonder what their kill to loss ratio is. I see that the African wild dog kill rate is 85% per chase, but then half the time their kill ends up being stolen by something else. -
2019-07-11 at 10:07 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ I wonder what their kill to loss ratio is. I see that the African wild dog kill rate is 85% per chase, but then half the time their kill ends up being stolen by something else.
that's what i mean, that is considered a high kill rate. african wild dogs are one of the most dangerous animals in whole of africa, and are well known for being one of africas top predators due to their ability to work as a group.
.