User Controls
Are you for or against the death penalty?
-
2018-08-04 at 11:02 AM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist the death penalty should only be used for offenders who use power and influence to start a war just so they can make more money through supplying the military. that is pretty much one of the few crimes truly deserving of it
you just justified hitlers pogrom
kikes are the single most prolific instigators of wars whereupon they provide financing (with interest) to both sides AND the weaponry used.
go read up on the background history of warfare starting in about 1100AD or so. -
2018-08-04 at 11:04 AM UTC
Originally posted by mso8 Then it's just the death penalty with a different purpose. It is cruel and unusual punishment to sentence a person to specifically harvest his organs.
some 'people' have zero redeeming qualities and can have their meaningless existences made less meaningless by providing one of their useless organs to someone in need -
2018-08-04 at 11:09 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock some 'people' have zero redeeming qualities and can have their meaningless existences made less meaningless by providing one of their useless organs to someone in need
Who are you to decide who is worthless and who isn't? Emotion should have no say in sentencing a human being and you are clearly being very emotional right now -
2018-08-04 at 11:14 AM UTC
Originally posted by mso8 Who are you to decide who is worthless and who isn't? Emotion should have no say in sentencing a human being and you are clearly being very emotional right now
you just completely validated my position
when emotions are removed from the equation the true value of a human life can be determined -
2018-08-04 at 11:21 AM UTCI don't think so. To emotionlessly determine the value of anything you need a standard upon which you can measure any given thing. Again, who are you, as a fallible human, to decide that measure.
-
2018-08-04 at 11:55 AM UTCSo it's ok if you die because your heart packs up, but not ok if you die due to a misjudgement of another human being?
-
2018-08-04 at 11:57 AM UTC
Originally posted by mso8 I don't think so. To emotionlessly determine the value of anything you need a standard upon which you can measure any given thing. Again, who are you, as a fallible human, to decide that measure.
youve made that abundantly obvious
go ahead and pick a standard to measure. any standard that you want...because no matter what you pick it will verify my position.
i didnt decide the measure. dont make this about me. it has nothing to do with me. -
2018-08-04 at 12:21 PM UTCI’m all for the death penalty....
Example: some psycho lady walked her 4 year old daughter out to a river to let her drown, and then walked right out of the river like nothing.
That woman should have two cinder blocks strapped to her ankles and thrown in the river, herself. JS -
2018-08-04 at 12:27 PM UTC
Originally posted by ~L J~ I’m all for the death penalty….
Example: some nigger dragged her 4 year old daughter out to a river, holding her down, screaming, until she drowned, and then walked right out of the river like nothing.
That nigger should be slathered in chum with two cinder blocks strapped to her ankles and thrown in the amazon river, herself. JS
fixed -
2018-08-04 at 12:32 PM UTC
-
2018-08-04 at 1:32 PM UTCFor it. And I’d like to see it applied to a few daterape hotel members here
-
2018-08-04 at 1:51 PM UTC
Originally posted by Cootehill So it's ok if you die because your heart packs up, but not ok if you die due to a misjudgement of another human being?
Are you asking me to judge between a person dying naturally and a person being killed?
Originally posted by infinityshock youve made that abundantly obvious
go ahead and pick a standard to measure. any standard that you want…because no matter what you pick it will verify my position.
i didnt decide the measure. dont make this about me. it has nothing to do with me.
If anything, it will verify your position by technicality, which is ultimately worthless. When you measure something to a standard it happens without emotion, yes. But to create a worthy standard for such an issue nothing but emotion is at play. -
2018-08-04 at 2:05 PM UTCName: Wesbrook, Coy Wayne
Executed: 03/09/2016
Summary of Incident:
On November 13, 1997, in Channelview, Wesbrook was invited over to the residence of his ex-wife, a 32-year-old white female. Wesbrook believed this meeting was for a possible marital reconciliation, but when he arrived, there were others present. He sat around drinking with all of them. At some point in the evening, Wesbrook noticed that his ex-wife and two of the men had slipped away, and when he went into the bedroom, he found her having sex with both of the men. Wesbrook then went to his truck and pulled out his .36-caliber hunting rifle and returned to the residence. He then fatally shot his ex-wife and all three of the males in the residence. Another female was injured, but survived the shooting.
Last Statement:
Yeah, first off, I want to say that I am sorry for the pain that I have caused you people. I am sorry that I cannot bring everybody back. I wish it could be different. I know it would be hard for you to understand what went on that night, I can’t bring them back as much as I would like to. I love my daughter and all of my supporters. I pray that the Lord take care of me and all of you. I have no bad sentiment towards anyone. I can understand your outrage and why you are mad at me. God be with all of us.
-
2018-08-04 at 2:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by ~L J~ I knew you’d have a comment on that one.
So crazy and so sad, but yes, you’re correct.
not really. this world has gone full-tarded and that evolutionary failure is nothing more than another example of it
did you hear about the niggers that laughed at another nigger while he called for help? that was up in cocoa.
it was in international news.
niggers should stay away from water. its like garlic to vampires. -
2018-08-04 at 2:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by mso8 If anything, it will verify your position by technicality, which is ultimately worthless. When you measure something to a standard it happens without emotion, yes. But to create a worthy standard for such an issue nothing but emotion is at play.
youre an idiot. verifying my position is the result and how that result came about is irrelevant other than for you to pointlessly mumble on about it.
as long as you include emotion in the equation youre skewing the results. i already told you to provide an example that you find acceptable. obviously you are unable to do so. you are not qualified to do so. your mental capacity is not capable of accomplishing anything more elaborate of a feat that getting your shoes on the right feet...and the only reason youre able to do that is because your mother painted an 'R' and 'L' on them. and...even then you fuck it up half the time. -
2018-08-04 at 2:29 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL Name: Wesbrook, Coy Wayne
Executed: 03/09/2016
Summary of Incident:
On November 13, 1997, in Channelview, Wesbrook was invited over to the residence of his ex-wife, a 32-year-old white female. Wesbrook believed this meeting was for a possible marital reconciliation, but when he arrived, there were others present. He sat around drinking with all of them. At some point in the evening, Wesbrook noticed that his ex-wife and two of the men had slipped away, and when he went into the bedroom, he found her having sex with both of the men. Wesbrook then went to his truck and pulled out his .36-caliber hunting rifle and returned to the residence. He then fatally shot his ex-wife and all three of the males in the residence. Another female was injured, but survived the shooting.
Last Statement:
Yeah, first off, I want to say that I am sorry for the pain that I have caused you people. I am sorry that I cannot bring everybody back. I wish it could be different. I know it would be hard for you to understand what went on that night, I can’t bring them back as much as I would like to. I love my daughter and all of my supporters. I pray that the Lord take care of me and all of you. I have no bad sentiment towards anyone. I can understand your outrage and why you are mad at me. God be with all of us.
he grossly misinterpreted the cue that she wanted a gang bang
theres no such thing as a '.36 caliber hunting rifle' -
2018-08-04 at 2:31 PM UTC
-
2018-08-04 at 2:45 PM UTCDo they even make .38 caliber guns or are 38's just cheaper target practice for a 357?
-
2018-08-04 at 3 PM UTC
Originally posted by Madman Do they even make .38 caliber guns or are 38's just cheaper target practice for a 357?
yes. .38s were around long before .357 magnum. they are identical diameters and a bullet that fits in a .357 barrel will fit in a .38 barrel. the cartridges are the same except the .38 is shorter than a .357 magnum, which means a gun that was built to fire a .357 can also chamber a .38 but a gun that was designed to fire a .38 wont let the .357 fit.
another unusual aspect of that caliber is it is one of the few calibers where the bullets are the same diameter as several different rifle calibers, making it possible to fire the pistol bullets in the rifle cartridge. -
2018-08-04 at 3 PM UTC