User Controls
The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attention
-
2018-07-03 at 5:53 AM UTC
-
2018-07-03 at 5:53 AM UTCfix the snake oil
-
2018-07-03 at 5:55 AM UTC
-
2018-07-03 at 5:55 AM UTClanny changed the thread title because whenever my intelligence level gets brought up it makes him feel worthless by comparison (he is). can you imagine dedicating your entire life to wanking academia bullshit just to realize you're still a fucking mongoloid compared to someone who smokes spice and slashes up his arm. if i was him i would probably kill myself
-
2018-07-03 at 5:55 AM UTC
-
2018-07-03 at 5:57 AM UTC
-
2018-07-03 at 5:57 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Nor for anyone who didn't have a brain injury to start with. But given what counts for evidence in nootropic circles that might be a sizable part of the target demographic.
what counts for evidence to you is the equivalent of ancient chakra spirit crystal talk by autistic greek men -
2018-07-03 at 6 AM UTCb-b-but thats equivalent to the scientific process!!1!
-
2018-07-03 at 6:02 AM UTC
-
2018-07-03 at 6:06 AM UTC
-
2018-07-03 at 6:14 AM UTC
-
2018-07-03 at 6:17 AM UTCi wonder how much noopept lanny would need to use to learn the formula called google(xnootropic + placebo controlled trial) = evidence
-
2018-07-03 at 6:19 AM UTCor this really obscure website called examine.com which compiles all the evidence for you https://examine.com/supplements/noopept/
and yeah, noopept has a low level of evidence compared to many other nootropics. clearly every nootropic is exactly the same, even in terms of the research done for it -
2018-07-03 at 7:10 AM UTC
Originally posted by Glokula's Homabla all antidepressant mechanisms indirectly act through the neurogenesis they cause. nice dunning-kruger, bro
literally meaningless
Originally posted by Glokula's Homabla or this really obscure website called examine.com which compiles all the evidence for you https://examine.com/supplements/noopept/
and yeah, noopept has a low level of evidence compared to many other nootropics. clearly every nootropic is exactly the same, even in terms of the research done for it
Highlighted at the top of the examine (lol) article:In essence, it appears to be a buffed up version of Piracetam. Piracetam itself had pretty weak evidence for cognitive enhancement in healthy persons (where it occurred, but fairly unreliably so and not to a large degree) and although Noopept has potential to succeed where Piracetam failed this needs to be investigated further.
-
2018-07-03 at 7:12 AM UTC
Originally posted by Glokula's Homabla or this really obscure website called examine.com which compiles all the evidence for you https://examine.com/supplements/noopept/
and yeah, noopept has a low level of evidence compared to many other nootropics. clearly every nootropic is exactly the same, even in terms of the research done for it
Literally try searching for that. The first page is 100% irrelevant or garbage lol.
You have no critical thinking skills sploo. -
2018-07-03 at 7:14 AM UTC
-
2018-07-03 at 7:17 AM UTCno, most of the interesting stuff on neopets is in Russian* - I just fed the abstracts into google translate to see if the paper would be worth going through, then doing the rest if it was
even if there are plenty of syntactical mistakes, the translations are surprisingly readable nowadays
*they prescribe it for virtually any psychological condition, lol -
2018-07-03 at 7:17 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny literally meaningless
Literal highlighted at the top of the examine (lol) article:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3155214/ for first quote
did you almost every USA approved psychiatric medication is also this "where it occurred, but fairly unreliably so and not to a large degree"
as in, minor but statistically significant effects
and then, wow we have two nootropics noopept and piracetam with weak-moderate effects (mild = not at all obviously). i didnt know there were 2 nootropics. i thought there were hundreds known or maybe thousands.
what would have an absolutely extremely statistically significant effect would be smoked 7 grams of crack at once and then typing an essay. but people arent looking to fucking rock their minds they're looking for something subtle with benefits, hence a mild-moderate statistical significance.
im not going to argue with you any more because you're a total retard -
2018-07-03 at 7:21 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny Literally try searching for that. The first page is 100% irrelevant or garbage lol.
You have no critical thinking skills sploo.
"i wonder how much noopept lanny would need to use to learn the formula called google(xnootropic + placebo controlled trial) = evidence"
so you think that because i used noopept in the first part of the sentence, when i said "xnootropic" which was clearly a way of expressing a variable, it means the the variable must be NOOPEPT, even though i said afterwards that noopept has weak evidence. xnootropics tooootally couldnt mean every other nootropic in existence. but as an anecdotal report, it worked for me. so i guess its snake oil because 75 stage III clinical trials havent been done on it. stop making these terrible assumptions you fucking dumbass -
2018-07-03 at 7:27 AM UTC
Originally posted by Glokula's Homabla https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3155214/ for first quote
did you almost every USA approved psychiatric medication is also this (where it occurred, but fairly unreliably so and not to a large degree)
as in, minor but statistically significant effects
and then, wow we have two nootropics noopept and piracetam with weak-moderate effects (mild = not at all obviously). i didnt know there were 2 nootropics. i thought there were hundreds known or maybe thousands.
what would have an absolutely extremely statistically significant effect would be smoked 7 grams of crack at once and then typing an essay. but people arent looking to fucking rock their minds they're looking for something subtle with benefits, hence a mild-moderate statistical significance.
im not going to argue with you any more because you're a total retard
Your post is a nearly unparsable stream of consciousness that fails to make any real argument. All I'm seeing is apologetics for no good clinical results in healthy adults. Until you figure out how to come up with those, what you have is snake oil as far as a consumer should be concerned.