User Controls
Fuck the troops
-
2017-09-25 at 7:21 PM UTCI'm glad I'm not the only one that says FUCK THE TROOPS.
Great job NIS, maybe you're not mindless snails afterall! -
2017-09-25 at 7:29 PM UTCI don't say fuck them, I merely point out the fact they are being used as expendable pawns by the corrupt system.
-
2017-09-25 at 7:30 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-09-25 at 7:33 PM UTC
-
2017-09-25 at 7:35 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-09-25 at 7:41 PM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL They are mostly kids, FFS. You expect them to have made good life choices and expected them to come out any different because of those bad choices? You have high expectations!
I am merely discounting the respect and admiration that the public is encouraged to provide them. -
2017-09-25 at 7:50 PM UTC
-
2017-09-25 at 7:51 PM UTCDarwinism! Fuck them.
-
2017-09-25 at 7:52 PM UTCWell gonts, looks like another successful Bill Krozby thread
-
2017-09-25 at 7:54 PM UTCThanks bro
-
2017-09-25 at 7:55 PM UTCI know nothing of Timberland. Haven't even heard of the place.
-
2017-09-26 at 12:46 AM UTC
Originally posted by Totse 2001 I think a lot of Americans are aware of this now, unlike then. We know NPRK has not just nukes, but hydrogene weapons. those are huge. probably close to a megaton now. and now it seems a delivery system.
That's why an investigation is needed for Iraq and 9/11 all over again. but no one will. they're afraid of the Bush family and Dick Cheney's Halliburton feeds lots of families. well paid (well deserved for their work) roughneck oil drillers. they love cheney. but Halliburton is just a company.. He was CEO and he had investment stocks and he won the contract to put out oil fires and rebuild pipelines in Iraq and neighborhing countries.. while our weapons may have been involved or pushed Iraq to do so. it's weird. Its like Ford selling Germany engines during WWII.
Its not the DoD at fault.. it's Upper Management and corruption. everything is all fucked up
stfu. you dont even know what a 'hydrogene' weapon is. you sure to fuck cant even spell it...
that slanty eyed molestation victim is barely able to get a nuke to fizzle...much less create fusion. -
2017-09-26 at 1:32 AM UTC
Originally posted by Totse 2001 We know NPRK has not just nukes, but hydrogene weapons. those are huge. probably close to a megaton now. and now it seems a delivery system.
That's why an investigation is needed for Iraq and 9/11 all over again.
I don't understand why you keep linking these things together -
2017-09-26 at 1:58 AM UTC
-
2017-09-26 at 2:24 AM UTC
-
2017-09-26 at 2:34 AM UTC
Originally posted by Totse 2001 You're saying they don't have Hydrogene weapons? fuck MSM I mean the Chinese and Russians are concerned. China is close to NPRK and they dont seem happy
china doesn't care what weapons NK has, all they care about is regional stability. they understand that even if NK has nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them, their tech is primitive and they have such a small landmass that a return strike would be the end of the country.
the only thing that China is concerned about is their constant baiting of the US, considering they've pledged to back NK if NK is attacked first.
realistically, they really don't pose an existential threat to anyone except maybe SK and Japan, given their proximity and small landmass.
Post last edited by aldra at 2017-09-27T03:12:11.949278+00:00 -
2017-09-26 at 2:51 AM UTC
Originally posted by Totse 2001 You're saying they don't have Hydrogene weapons? fuck MSM I mean the Chinese and Russians are concerned. China is close to NPRK and they dont seem happy
no, they dont.
fission and fusion are two completely different things and produce detectable after-effects that can determine which is which. they (nutty korea) tried a fusion bomb at one point then when the speshul aircraft flying around detected one of the products of the explosion indicating fusion, everyone was all spooled up but then when there was a final analysis it was in such miniscule trace amounts the origin was the actual ingredients in the bomb itself that didnt fuse/explode...they were blasted out without reacting the way they were supposed to because the retards didnt know what they were doing.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-09-27 at 3:02 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock no, they dont.
fission and fusion are two completely different things and produce detectable after-effects that can determine which is which. they (nutty korea) tried a fusion bomb at one point then when the speshul aircraft flying around detected one of the products of the explosion indicating fusion, everyone was all spooled up but then when there was a final analysis it was in such miniscule trace amounts the origin was the actual ingredients in the bomb itself that didnt fuse/explode…they were blasted out without reacting the way they were supposed to because the retards didnt know what they were doing.
give them time
in a documentary (which doesn't go into specifics for obvious reasons) they basicly showed that a Hydrogene bomb is 2 Hydrogene (solid Hydrogene) elements fused together (fusion?) and the basic atomic bomb is only used as a trigger device which after there is critical mass it then heats the 2 hydrogene mixes and burns more of the plutonium off
I don't know the real technical part of it obviously, but atomic bombs only released between 2-5 percent of it's potential and when they then stuck this inside 2 hydrogene solid materials that the hydrogene ignited up to 80-85 percent of the plutoniums capabilities.
My guess is the uranium bullet hitting the ball of plutonium isn't any larger but the plutonium releases 85% of it's capability of energy it can release.
anyways.. if this is what the fucking crazy fat bastard is trying to acomplish.. it's only a matter of time before he does find a way.
but remember.. the size really doesn't matter. you take the same release of one large nuke like Mike or even Szar Bomba, and reduce it to multiple weapons, you would do more damage. the larger nukes are only impressive and create mental or psychological fear, but they burn the sky which does little harm outside of radioactive fallout.
if they center nukes to a spiral formed scorch earth method.. much more land from one weapon can be leveled.
more small atomic bombs are far more destructive than one large hydrogene bomb. -
2017-09-28 at 1:27 AM UTC
Originally posted by Totse 2001 give them time
in a documentary (which doesn't go into specifics for obvious reasons) they basicly showed that a Hydrogene bomb is 2 Hydrogene (solid Hydrogene) elements fused together (fusion?) and the basic atomic bomb is only used as a trigger device which after there is critical mass it then heats the 2 hydrogene mixes and burns more of the plutonium off
I don't know the real technical part of it obviously, but atomic bombs only released between 2-5 percent of it's potential and when they then stuck this inside 2 hydrogene solid materials that the hydrogene ignited up to 80-85 percent of the plutoniums capabilities.
My guess is the uranium bullet hitting the ball of plutonium isn't any larger but the plutonium releases 85% of it's capability of energy it can release.
anyways.. if this is what the fucking crazy fat bastard is trying to acomplish.. it's only a matter of time before he does find a way.
but remember.. the size really doesn't matter. you take the same release of one large nuke like Mike or even Szar Bomba, and reduce it to multiple weapons, you would do more damage. the larger nukes are only impressive and create mental or psychological fear, but they burn the sky which does little harm outside of radioactive fallout.
if they center nukes to a spiral formed scorch earth method.. much more land from one weapon can be leveled.
accurate plans and instructions for building nukes are all over the internet.
having the plans is one thing...collecting all the required materials and components is virtually impossible. and thats the easy part. even if you do manage to get the proper 'types' of material, you have to assemble all that stuff in a manner where the measurements are in millionths of an inch...and if theyre off by that much youre left with a really 'spensive firecracker that makes shit glow in the dark. for example...one of the types has the fissile material formed into a perfect sphere...and i mean perfect to the point it looks like a giant ball bearing with a mirror finish. then, surrounding that absolutely perfect sphere has to be an even larger perfect sphere of high explosives. THEN surrounding that perfect sphere has to be a network of detonators absolutely perfectly placed around that sphere with perfect spacing precision. T H E N...those detonators have to be detonated at the exact same time...i mean EXACT same time.
Originally posted by Totse 2001 more small atomic bombs are far more destructive than one large hydrogene bomb.
that.
in military target-planning that is one of the basics...not to use one, single high-yield device on a 'large' target.
the good old days...ADM, ftw. -
2017-09-28 at 1:36 AM UTCNeither of you know shit
Stop
