![](/static/img/peekaboo.16547b8aab5d.png)
![](/static/banners/niggasinspacee.715fdd0fcc4f.png)
User Controls
Tranny Fags: GTFO
-
2017-07-27 at 1:55 AM UTC
Originally posted by Totse 2001 You can't fire a pistol but you can fire a fully auto M-16 rifle? where is the logic in this rule
i meant youre not allowed to in general but you can in the military.
hell...i was firing several different versions of full auto rifles/GPMGs...40mm grenades including from a full-auto launcher...altho never M16s...they were always semi-auto. i think i was 20 or so before I fired my first MANPAD. -
2017-07-27 at 7:30 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock send more handsome and well tanned individuals to die…its the only thing theyre good for
when that happens, their ''brethren'' who didnt go to die in wars or didnt die in wars are going to bitch for more affirmative actions and get it.
there can be nothing worse than being ''indebted'' to niggers.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-07-27 at 8:24 AM UTC
-
2017-07-27 at 8:38 AM UTC*shrug*
-
2017-07-27 at 8:40 AM UTC
-
2017-07-27 at 8:45 AM UTC
-
2017-07-27 at 11:16 AM UTCWell this fucks up Bill Krozby and mash's backup plan, guess they will have to stick to the street corner.
-
2017-07-27 at 12:31 PM UTC
-
2017-07-27 at 1:50 PM UTC
-
2017-07-27 at 2:22 PM UTCThe reason females should not be allowed in the military is because most of the men in the military are thirsty as fuck and cannot handle acting professionally around them. Seriously. Go to Afghan with like 3 chicks in your unit and watch 90% of the dudes cuck themselves repeatedly and shirk their duties in order to give all their attention to some barracks rat skank with at least 2 or 3 STIs in the false hope that they'll get some. It's straight up pathetic.
-
2017-07-27 at 2:29 PM UTCIt's because their wrists are too limp to fire a rifle properly.
-
2017-07-27 at 2:38 PM UTC
-
2017-07-27 at 2:39 PM UTC
-
2017-07-27 at 2:40 PM UTC
-
2017-07-27 at 2:43 PM UTCIf a transexual proves themselves competent to serve, what's wrong with that?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-07-27 at 2:56 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ If a transexual proves themselves competent to serve, what's wrong with that?
Because they are an extreme minority, especially in the military, and the logistics of accommodating them and having them be non deployable for a long time puts an unnecessary strain on the military. There are a shit ton of conditions and things that can disqualify you for being in the military for similar reasons, like depression and diabetes. It's really not a human rights issue at all, despite morons on both sides trying to pretend like it is. -
2017-07-27 at 3:18 PM UTC
-
2017-07-27 at 3:23 PM UTC
-
2017-07-27 at 3:25 PM UTC
-
2017-07-27 at 3:26 PM UTC