User Controls
Are you looking forward to the big war with Iran?
-
2024-05-10 at 2:04 PM UTC
-
2024-05-10 at 2:48 PM UTC
Originally posted by ner vegas that's the point, offensive weapons always advance faster than defensive ones so a single $10 billion ship is a huge liability. they're primarily for bullying countries that have no way to fight back. a peer or near peer is going to be able to saturate AA/AD (using hypersonics and/or modern ASBMs) and kill the carrier for a fraction of its cost.
I suspect China is building them primarily as a symbol of prestige to show that they're part of the Big Boys Club rather than any practical purpose.
Aircraft carriers do not operate in isolation but as part of a carrier strike group which includes destroyers, cruisers, and submarines, all equipped with advanced defensive systems designed to intercept a variety of threats, including hypersonic missiles and advanced ASBMs. The combination of onboard and escort ship defenses, such as AEGIS-equipped cruisers and destroyers capable of ballistic missile defense, electronic warfare suites, and networked sensor systems, enhances the survivability of the entire group, not just the carrier.
The argument that offensive weapons are cheaper and more advanced than defensive ones overlooks the economic and strategic calculus that includes deterrence and power projection. Carriers enable a form of deterrence not just by their combat capabilities, but also through their ability to be forward-deployed, thereby providing a persistent presence that can influence regional behavior and deter potential adversaries without engaging in conflict. This projection of power can often prevent conflicts and promote stability, which might be more cost-effective in the long run than engaging in war.
Aircraft carriers are highly adaptable platforms. They can launch a variety of missions—from strike operations to humanitarian aid—over vast distances. This versatility makes them valuable assets in both war and peace, capable of responding to rapidly changing tactical situations and providing government leaders with multiple response options in a crisis.
While the prestige of having an aircraft carrier can enhance a nation's status on the world stage, it is a byproduct rather than the primary purpose of possessing such vessels. For China, and indeed for any nation investing in carriers, the strategic rationale includes securing sea lanes, asserting maritime claims, and enhancing the ability to influence regional and global events. The ability to operate at sea with carriers also supports diplomatic strategies by providing a platform for international cooperation and engagement, such as joint exercises and humanitarian missions.
The advancement of military technology is a continuous process affecting both offensive and defensive systems. The dynamic nature of military technology means that strategies and platforms are continually adapted to new threats. The development and deployment of new technologies, like unmanned systems and artificial intelligence, are expected to further enhance the capabilities and defensive posture of carrier groups. -
2024-05-10 at 2:50 PM UTCI AM NOT GOING TO ARGUE WITH CHATGPT
-
2024-05-10 at 2:51 PM UTC
-
2024-05-10 at 2:52 PM UTC
-
2024-05-10 at 3:13 PM UTC
-
2024-05-10 at 3:28 PM UTC
-
2024-05-10 at 3:28 PM UTC
-
2024-05-10 at 3:42 PM UTC
Originally posted by Donald Trump Dunno what one you mean
someone asked chat gpt about something about best legal outcome for women who choose to be with a bear than be with a man in the forest.
chat gpt replied that its a win for everyone involved.
the bear gets a free meal
the woman gets to prove her status as a victim undisputedly
and the man dont get accused of "rape". -
2024-05-10 at 4 PM UTCOh yeah, I think that's on Anglin's weekly meme dump.
-
2024-05-10 at 4:06 PM UTC
-
2024-05-10 at 4:35 PM UTC
Originally posted by Charles Ex Machina someone asked chat gpt about something about best legal outcome for women who choose to be with a bear than be with a man in the forest.
chat gpt replied that its a win for everyone involved.
the bear gets a free meal
the woman gets to prove her status as a victim undisputedly
and the man dont get accused of "rape".
This is like one of those jokes where George Bush, Osama and Ariel Sharon are sitting in an airplane -
2024-05-10 at 8:43 PM UTC
Originally posted by Bradley My mom said to me today 'I saw a lot of people hate Israel and the jedis. I remember when you hated them and everyone at school was appalled. Now look"
Its true. it's just a flave of the times. it's not a grand awakening because ONCE AGAIN> not all J'ews are behind evil just like Bush and Cheney and the Former king of house of saud isn't Jewish.
so many corporate scum NOT J'EW
its just a blame game. Not all Bolshe were J'ews either but they're behind much of this shit. but it's just easier to say DA J'ew -
2024-05-10 at 8:45 PM UTC
-
2024-05-11 at 1:14 AM UTC
-
2024-05-11 at 1:16 AM UTC
Originally posted by Insane Alien Flying Frenzy Its true. it's just a flave of the times. it's not a grand awakening because ONCE AGAIN> not all J'ews are behind evil just like Bush and Cheney and the Former king of house of saud isn't Jewish.
so many corporate scum NOT J'EW
its just a blame game. Not all Bolshe were J'ews either but they're behind much of this shit. but it's just easier to say DA J'ew
Bruh -
2024-05-11 at 1:29 AM UTC
Originally posted by Insane Alien Flying Frenzy Its true. it's just a flave of the times. it's not a grand awakening because ONCE AGAIN> not all J'ews are behind evil just like Bush and Cheney and the Former king of house of saud isn't Jewish.
so many corporate scum NOT J'EW
its just a blame game. Not all Bolshe were J'ews either but they're behind much of this shit. but it's just easier to say DA J'ew
all jedis are involved.
literally -
2024-05-11 at 2:43 AM UTCAll jedis are complicit in a constructed social heirarchy that systemically privileges the jedis over the grossboys.
-
2024-05-21 at 2:04 PM UTC
-
2024-05-21 at 6:27 PM UTCJuts a big "make work" scam for a multi-trillion-dollar cash grab straight out of the tax coffers. Nothing more.