User Controls
Poll: Will Elon Musk take over Twitter?
- Yes a win for free speech .
-
No I cry when people type things I don't agreed with.
- mmQ ,
- troon ,
- Meikai ,
- AngryOnion ,
- Sudo ,
- Donald Trump ,
- Bradley
Twitter Is Under Siege
-
2022-04-15 at 1:49 PM UTC
-
2022-04-15 at 1:50 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Yup…free speech not applicable, never was, never will be unless the government directly take over it…and even then you've gotta have been born yesterday to believe a government run organization would support "free speech"
USPS, the IRS, NPWS, etc never deplatformed anyone. -
2022-04-15 at 1:51 PM UTC
-
2022-04-15 at 1:52 PM UTCI wonder how much Jack Dorsey would make Off that 41B. I hope the Indian guy doesn't make a thing ane has his job replaced by a white person
-
2022-04-15 at 2:01 PM UTC"Does the First Amendment Apply to Social Media Companies?
So the answer to the question, "Do you have a right not to be kicked off a social media platform?" is no! You have no such right. Many people are shocked to learn that the First Amendment free speech guarantee, along with all constitutional rights, only protects us against the government. So, if the government interferes with your freedom of speech, you can bring a First Amendment lawsuit to challenge that. And that's true whether we're talking about a federal government official or a state or local government official. But guess what? Facebook, Twitter, the other social media platforms are not the government. "
It's real simple folks, discussing "free speech" in relation to a privately owned/publicly traded organization is about as rere as it gets...I'd expect nothing less from Speedy. -
2022-04-15 at 2:02 PM UTCThis is just further evidence of decentralized autonomous organizations taking over the mainstream and it's the reason why this resonates with people and is such a big news story is because Elon Musk is a public figure that is showing people a mindset that you don't have to rely on the government or big tech, you can build it yourself.
Anyone that is against Elon Musk or his DAO can, as i've said in the past when Trump got banned. Just "build their own twitter" and i'm not being an ass hat about that either.
I was wrong in my prediction that Trump getting banned would lead to a mass social media exodus of and people forming their own decentralized networks. Maybe it doesn't all happen at once but in slow increments because of events like this.
Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood Nothing will happen because nothing ever happens just like how nothing happened on 1/6
Nobody wants to overthrow the government because you are all brainwashed lap dogs trained to love the police and politicians.
All you did was create a new political class born out of anger, censorship, conspiracy and mistrust of the mainstream political elite because you won't shut up about how they are all Putin nazis or whatever. Trump literally didn't do anything he only got 1 term and didn't do shit but the toxicity in the media and getting banned from social media was the last straw
you can't just fucking do that and expect nothing will happen. Ever heard of the fediverse?
it's not all doom and gloom I have only seen good things come from political turmoil I hope there is a lot more, more violence and a real uprising with guns and hundreds dead in the streets. But that is never gonna happen in our lifetimes because people are too brainwashed.
https://niggasin.space/thread/73850 -
2022-04-15 at 2:03 PM UTC
-
2022-04-15 at 2:03 PM UTCnot pro pedphilia per se pro hephephilia or sumply me defending european aoc laws.
-
2022-04-15 at 2:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker I am setting the over/under on Trump returning to Twitter at July 4th,2022.
ttps://youtu.be/ZW2WFqx5yFY
lol.
trump already have his own twitter.
why would he return.
also you and anyone else who think freespeeches will return once elom musk take over is purely and clinically retarded.
elon musk is a techie, hes just like a successful version of lanny and like lanny, as much as lanny is pro freespeeches he still have his own personal red lines which when crossed, will end up with perma bans.
just because elon took over twitter doesnt mean everybody will be allowed. freespeeches will be allowed as long as they please the new twitter boss.
thats how things will always be.
retards/ -
2022-04-15 at 2:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by Wariat prostasia is a legitimate organization man with a very strong following and controversy on twitter so bad they had to only allow people to comment who follow them. how is that unbiased coverage or public discourse?
they should have their IP address posted publicly on their twitter profile so people can firebomb their offices -
2022-04-15 at 2:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson "Does the First Amendment Apply to Social Media Companies?
So the answer to the question, "Do you have a right not to be kicked off a social media platform?" is no! You have no such right. Many people are shocked to learn that the First Amendment free speech guarantee, along with all constitutional rights, only protects us against the government. So, if the government interferes with your freedom of speech, you can bring a First Amendment lawsuit to challenge that. And that's true whether we're talking about a federal government official or a state or local government official. But guess what? Facebook, Twitter, the other social media platforms are not the government. "
It's real simple folks, discussing "free speech" in relation to a privately owned/publicly traded organization is about as rere as it gets…I'd expect nothing less from Speedy.
well then when your government refuses to uphold freedom of speeches on social media it could be construed as your government intefering and infringing on your freedom to speeches and your ability to deliver them to the masses unmollested. -
2022-04-15 at 2:26 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny well then when your government refuses to uphold freedom of speeches on social media it could be construed as your government intefering and infringing on your freedom to speeches and your ability to deliver them to the masses unmollested.
No it couldn't. For starters they are not infringing on my ability to deliver my message to the masses...just as I have no right to grow potatoes on my neighbors land I have no right to delivery my blurb on twitters platform. -
2022-04-15 at 3:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson No it couldn't. For starters they are not infringing on my ability to deliver my message to the masses…just as I have no right to grow potatoes on my neighbors land I have no right to delivery my blurb on twitters platform.
by that logic the government doesnt have to do anything in the event that you are being attacked by a pack of ferral negroes, because it isnt the government that attacks you. -
2022-04-15 at 3:52 PM UTC
-
2022-04-15 at 3:56 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny by that logic the government doesnt have to do anything in the event that you are being attacked by a pack of ferral negroes, because it isnt the government that attacks you.
Non sequitur, your example has absolutely nothing to do with the 1st amendment which is the discussion here. -
2022-04-15 at 4:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Really? you think no one every got fired from USPS, IRS and NPWS for things they've said at work?
Jared Taylor and his followers will be back at Montgomery Bell State Park in Burns for their annual conference at the end of July.
https://fox17.com/news/local/white-advocacy-group-returns-to-middle-tennessee-for-6th-annual-conference
It is the group’s sixth visit to Tennessee.
Why do they keep coming back?
The nature is great but Taylor says unlike national hotel chains, state parks like Montgomery Bell can't turn people away because they don't like the message.
LMAO, Jared Taylor's "followers".
And they go on and on about violence, at a time when blacks are targeting whites in racially motivated terrorist attacks on the New York subway.
Did USPS ever cut off someone's letters cos they think whites deserve to have their own homeland?
Did the phone company or the electricity company ever cut off someone cos they didn't like them pointing out jedi power?
That's completely illegitimate. The best Twitter can say to their shareholders is that they censor for the same reason small businesses in New York used to pay protection money to the (now memory-holed) jedi mob. Otherwise they will be attacked by the violent semites. -
2022-04-15 at 4:05 PM UTC
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson "Does the First Amendment Apply to Social Media Companies?
So the answer to the question, "Do you have a right not to be kicked off a social media platform?" is no! You have no such right. Many people are shocked to learn that the First Amendment free speech guarantee, along with all constitutional rights, only protects us against the government. So, if the government interferes with your freedom of speech, you can bring a First Amendment lawsuit to challenge that. And that's true whether we're talking about a federal government official or a state or local government official. But guess what? Facebook, Twitter, the other social media platforms are not the government. "
It's real simple folks, discussing "free speech" in relation to a privately owned/publicly traded organization is about as rere as it gets…I'd expect nothing less from Speedy.
when they constitute a monopoly on online speech (in terms of the first amendment, a standin for the idea of a 'town square') then yes, the constitution should legally apply to them
it's the same reason company stores are illegal, the government just doesn't care because unlike a mining company capturing its employees and preventing them from paying taxes on sales, these online monopolies present a very effective soft-power that the people in power can controlThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2022-04-15 at 4:08 PM UTC
-
2022-04-15 at 4:10 PM UTC
Originally posted by aldra when they constitute a monopoly on online speech (in terms of the first amendment, a standin for the idea of a 'town square') then yes, the constitution should legally apply to them
Not true at all as far as the 1st amendment goes, and twitter doesn't hold a monopoly anyway. IF the government got involved in specific posts/bans made by private company then that itself would be goverenment interference and a breach of Twitter's (or whatever platform) right to free speech.
A private company/organization CANNOT infringe on the 1st amendment rights of it's members as there are no such requirements for them to abide by them (read the 1st amendment), not to mention the fact when you sign up with Twitter or any other such platform the rules are there and the right for the platform to terminate your account at anytime for any reason is also there...you agree to that when you sign up.
Case closed. -
2022-04-15 at 4:12 PM UTCIt's mind boggling that so many people think a private platform has to comply with the 1st amendment rights as far as his members go...MIND BOGGGGGGLING.
