User Controls

THE MAGA PARTY!,,, the GOP is dead, republicans are going down with the dems,, get ready for THE MAGA PARTY lefty's

  1. Speedy Parker Black Hole
  2. RIPtotse victim of incest [my adversative decurved garbo]
    Dude can someone explain to me what good biden has done?
  3. Originally posted by RIPtotse Dude can someone explain to me what good biden has done?

    By "good", do you mean shitting his pants and sniffing children?
  4. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    The New York Times
    Some of Trump’s Jan. 6 Calls Are Not in White House Logs
    Luke Broadwater, Jonathan Martin, Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt


    WASHINGTON — The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol has discovered gaps in official White House telephone logs from the day of the riot, finding few records of calls by President Donald J. Trump from critical hours when investigators know that he was making them.

    Investigators have not uncovered evidence that any official records were tampered with or deleted, and it is well known that Mr. Trump routinely used his personal cellphone, and those of his aides, to talk with other aides, congressional allies and outside confidants, bypassing the normal channels of presidential communication.

    But the sparse call records present a major obstacle to a central element of the panel’s work: recreating what Mr. Trump was doing behind closed doors during the assault on Congress by a mob of his supporters.

    The gaps in the call logs were the latest in a string of revelations this week about the extent of Mr. Trump’s flouting of the rules and norms of presidential conduct, and how his penchant for doing so has left an incomplete record of how he operated while in office.

    Some of the records that the Jan. 6 committee has received had been ripped to shreds and taped back together, reflecting the former president’s habit of tearing up documents. In addition, he removed more than a dozen boxes of presidential records from the White House when he left office, which the National Archives believes contained classified material, according to a person briefed on the matter.

    The House Oversight committee on Thursday announced an investigation into what it called “potential serious violations” of the Presidential Records Act.

    Mr. Trump has been loath to return the boxes of documents he took from the White House, despite repeated efforts by the National Archives to obtain them. At some point during a monthslong negotiation between Mr. Trump’s team and the agency, officials at the National Archives threatened to send a letter to Congress or the Department of Justice if he continued to withhold the boxes, according to a person familiar with private discussions, who spoke about them on the condition of anonymity.

    And while he was president, staff in the White House residence periodically discovered wads of printed paper clogging a toilet — leading them to believe that Mr. Trump had attempted to flush documents, according to people familiar with the situation. He was known to do the same on foreign trips, the people said. (Those incidents are recounted in a forthcoming book, “Confidence Man,” written by a New York Times reporter, about Mr. Trump and his presidency.)

    The highly irregular practices underscore the challenge of creating a full historical record of a presidency that often operated outside the bounds of longstanding rules.

    They have also prompted accusations of hypocrisy from Democrats, who recall how Mr. Trump branded Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of state “worse than Watergate,” and made “lock her up” a campaign rallying cry in 2016. Republicans who eagerly followed his lead in savaging Mrs. Clinton for her email practices have been notably silent amid revelations that Mr. Trump spent his four years in office — and much of the time since — mishandling presidential records.

    The House panel investigating Jan. 6 is still awaiting additional material from the National Archives and Records Administration, which keeps the official White House logs. The committee has also subpoenaed telecommunications companies for the personal cellphone records of a range of people in Mr. Trump’s inner circle.

    It is unknown whether the committee has specifically demanded records from Mr. Trump’s personal cellphone.

    The call logs obtained by the committee document who was calling the White House switchboard, and what calls were being made from the White House to others. Two people familiar with the phone records discussed details about them on the condition of anonymity because they did not want to be identified discussing an ongoing congressional investigation. A spokesman for the committee declined to comment.

    Since the attack on Jan. 6, 2021, former Trump administration officials have said that investigators would struggle to piece together a complete record of Trump’s conversations that day, because of his habit of using his and other people’s cellphones. At least one person who tried to reach Mr. Trump on his cellphone on Jan. 6 had their call picked up by one of his aides. It is unclear where Mr. Trump was at the time.

    Counterintelligence officials say it is highly risky for presidents to use their personal cellphones, as those phones almost certainly have no protection against spying by foreign adversaries. There is nothing in federal record-keeping laws that explicitly addresses whether a president can use a personal cellphone for official business. But the spirit of the law is that presidents should avoid doing so — and if they do, their calls should still be memorialized, said Jason R. Baron, the former director of litigation at the National Archives.

    “Government agencies are supposed to document phone calls when the conversation is about important government business,” said Mr. Baron, a professor at the University of Maryland. “A president choosing to use a personal cellphone on a sensitive matter of government business without the conversation being recorded anywhere raises serious questions about his compliance with the spirit” of the Presidential Records Act.

    Little is known of what Mr. Trump did inside the White House as rioters stormed the Capitol. He was watching television as the riot played out on cable news, and several aides, including his daughter Ivanka Trump, implored him to say something to try to get the rioters to stop.

    Nevertheless, his first public communication as the melee unfolded was a Twitter post attacking Vice President Mike Pence, who was presiding over the joint session of Congress to count the Electoral College votes. Mr. Trump also is known to have tried to reach out to one senator as the certification of the vote was delayed. And he fielded a call from Representative Kevin McCarthy, the top House Republican, who told Mr. Trump that people were breaking into his office on Capitol Hill.

    Early on in his administration, Mr. Trump was known to use a cellphone belonging to Keith Schiller, his personal bodyguard at Trump Tower and later the director of Oval Office operations, for some of his calls. It meant the White House call logs were often an incomplete reflection of his contacts.

    After the Supreme Court ruled against Mr. Trump’s efforts to block the release of hundreds of pages of presidential records, the National Archives turned over to the House panel investigating the riot voluminous documents that included daily presidential diaries, schedules, appointment information showing visitors to the White House, activity logs, call logs, and switchboard shift-change checklists showing calls to Mr. Trump and Mr. Pence on Jan. 6.

    Despite the lack of call records from the White House, the committee has learned in recent weeks that Mr. Trump spoke on the phone with Mr. Pence and Republican lawmakers on the morning of Jan. 6 as he pushed to overturn the election. For instance, Mr. Trump mistakenly called the phone of Senator Mike Lee, Republican of Utah, thinking it was the number of Senator Tommy Tuberville, Republican of Alabama. Mr. Lee then passed the phone to Mr. Tuberville, who said he spoke to the former president for less than 10 minutes as rioters were breaking into the building.

    But many of the calls the committee is aware of did not show up in the official logs.

    The committee did receive evidence in the documents requested from the National Archives that Mr. Trump had a call with Representative Jim Jordan, Republican of Ohio, who led the floor strategy on Jan. 6 of objecting to Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s victory in key states, according to two people familiar with the investigation. Mr. Jordan has said he spoke with Mr. Trump multiple times that day.

    The Washington Post reported on Wednesday that Justice Department officials were weighing whether to investigate Mr. Trump after the National Archives made a referral to the Justice Department, asking it to examine Mr. Trump’s handling of White House records.
  5. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by RIPtotse Dude can someone explain to me what good biden has done?

    Nothing much but it's subjective.

    What would you do if you were the president? What would be your main priorities?
  6. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    I want to know what people here would do if they were president of the United States of America
  7. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    absolute first step would be banning people with dual citizenship from public office
  8. What do these radical left wing assholes have to show for all the years of kicking, screaming, hoaxing, lying, scheming and attacks? Nothing. Zilch. Nada. Trillions of dollars, millions of man hours, with the combined might of BigTech, BigGov, BigPharma, BigEdu, Big Hollywood, BigCorp, and having control of both houses of government and the presidency, what do they have to show for it? Not a single thing. The losers of the century. Everything they touch turns to shit.
  9. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by aldra absolute first step would be banning people with dual citizenship from public office

    I can respect that. Ok. Good one. I think you would have the overwhelming majority of support in that particular thing.
  10. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ What do these radical left wing assholes have to show for all the years of kicking, screaming, hoaxing, lying, scheming and attacks? Nothing. Zilch. Nada. Trillions of dollars, millions of man hours, with the combined might of BigTech, BigGov, BigPharma, BigEdu, Big Hollywood, BigCorp, and having control of both houses of government and the presidency, what do they have to show for it? Not a single thing. The losers of the century. Everything they touch turns to shit.

    Answer my question though. What would you do as president ? Don't be a weird deflector like saint Louis
  11. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    I am the common man I am the person who you need to appeal to. A basic bitch, if you will. Appease me.
  12. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Make everyone happy at once somehow. I am everyone.
  13. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    (if it's not already obvious I'm kinda drinky, but I promise I'm just that and not on stims despite how much I'm posting all weird and fast)
  14. Originally posted by mmQ Answer my question though. What would you do as president ? Don't be a weird deflector like saint Louis

    I'd build giant slaughterhouses and start executing every single person who is part of this corrupt system. No mercy. No pity. They'd all be shot, hung, beheaded, gassed, drowned or burned alive.
  15. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ I'd build giant slaughterhouses and start executing every single person who is part of this corrupt system. No mercy. No pity. They'd all be shot, hung, beheaded or burned alive.

    How would you determine who is who?
  16. Originally posted by mmQ How would you determine who is who?

    It's not hard, if you're paying attention.
  17. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by mmQ I can respect that. Ok. Good one. I think you would have the overwhelming majority of support in that particular thing.

    maybe public support, but the existing political apparatus would cry bloody murder considering how many of them there are. entire families in some cases using the political system as a cash cow that never runs dry

    "you've heard of branch stacking, get ready for the whole family tree"
  18. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ It's not hard, if you're paying attention.

    Would you exterminate me?
  19. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Originally posted by aldra maybe public support, but the existing political apparatus would cry bloody murder considering how many of them there are. entire families in some cases using the political system as a cash cow that never runs dry

    "you've heard of branch stacking, get ready for the whole family tree"

    So, knowing that, then what? Lol
  20. mmQ Lisa Turtle
    Do good leaders just do what they think needs to be done despite overwhelming opposition or do good leaders do what the majority wants them to do?
Jump to Top