User Controls

Hey theists, convince me into believing in God.

  1. Originally posted by Chairman Takeshi Kaga What do you think the difference is?

    information content.
  2. Chairman Takeshi Kaga African Astronaut
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny information content.

    Do you think it's an assumption to say, for example, that your phone will fall towards the ground if you push it off your table?
  3. Originally posted by Chairman Takeshi Kaga Do you think it's an assumption to say, for example, that your phone will fall towards the ground if you push it off your table?

    depends on how much do you already know about gravity and newronian laws.
  4. Chairman Takeshi Kaga African Astronaut
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny depends on how much do you already know about gravity and newronian laws.

    Nope, it depends on the assumption that those laws will continue to hold.
  5. There's no such thing as 100% certainty in anything. Your fingerprints could be on the bloody knife handle at the murder scene, but there's a 0.0000000001% chance you just happened to pick up the knife while selling Girl Scout cookies door to door. The door was open a crack, you looked in, saw the body, walked in, bent down, touched the knife momentarily to see what it was, then left to report the murder. It's happened before. Nothing is ever 100% for sure, because there's no way to fully ascertain anything 100%. The best you can do is beyond a reasonable doubt.
  6. Originally posted by Chairman Takeshi Kaga Nope, it depends on the assumption that those laws will continue to hold.

    those laws are laws because everyone KNEW it WILL hold.

    with absolute certainty. tyats waht laws are.
  7. Chairman Takeshi Kaga African Astronaut
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny those laws are laws because everyone KNEW it WILL hold.

    with absolute certainty. tyats waht laws are.

    No not at all. They are laws given certain assumptions. For example, Snell's law doesn't hold for a linear birefringent crystal
  8. Kev Space Nigga
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ There's no such thing as 100% certainty in anything. Your fingerprints could be on the bloody knife handle at the murder scene, but there's a 0.0000000001% chance you just happened to pick up the knife while selling Girl Scout cookies door to door. The door was open a crack, you looked in, saw the body, walked in, bent down, touched the knife momentarily to see what it was, then left to report the murder. It's happened before. Nothing is ever 100% for sure, because there's no way to fully ascertain anything 100%. The best you can do is beyond a reasonable doubt.

    You are confusing evidence in jurisprudence with scientific evidence. the latter is absolute, not in proving something in the affirmitive with 100% certainty but it can prove something false with 100% certainty.

    there are many gods and holy books, they cant all be right but they can all be wrong. see how that works?
  9. Originally posted by Kev You are confusing evidence in jurisprudence with scientific evidence. the latter is absolute, not in proving something in the affirmitive with 100% certainty but it can prove something false with 100% certainty.

    there are many gods and holy books, they cant all be right but they can all be wrong. see how that works?

    There's no such thing as 100% certainty in anything. Fact.
  10. Narc Naturally Camouflaged [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ The reason God has not appeared to the masses is because of the requirement for non-interference. Satan the Devil and his army of rebels have been charged with treason. Their defense consists of certain false accusations. Those allegations have to be proven in the Highest Court, and so the opportunity to prove must be provided, without interference. Satan alleges that man does not need God to live a happy and satisfying life. He also alleges that God has no right to rule, and that his rule is not required, therefore his charges are invalid. And so, just as he allowed Satan to test faithful Job, in order to establish the truth for all to see for themselves, so we too are being tested.

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job%201&version=NIV

    And what you need for a happy and satisfying life speculum? To sit all day posting nonsensical garbage on the internet so you can sit behind a screen Bill Krozby-laughing to yourself while deluding yourself to the fact that people are taken in by your obvious is obvious trolling?

    Yeah that's right, I way ahead of ya


    .
  11. Originally posted by Narc And what you need for a happy and satisfying life speculum? To sit all day posting nonsensical garbage on the internet so you can sit behind a screen Bill Krozby-laughing to yourself while deluding yourself to the fact that people are taken in by your obvious is obvious trolling?

    Yeah that's right, I way ahead of ya


    .

    That didn't scare me, kid.
  12. Narc Naturally Camouflaged [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    I mean theres stupid and then theres dunning-kruger level stupid, you get me?


    .
  13. Originally posted by Narc I mean theres stupid and then theres dunning-kruger level stupid, you get me?


    .

    Yet I'm not the guy who puts a period three lines after every post. Go figure.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  14. the man who put it in my hood Black Hole [miraculously counterclaim my golf]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Yet I'm not the guy who puts a period three lines after every post. Go figure.

    LOL
  15. Originally posted by Chairman Takeshi Kaga No not at all. They are laws given certain assumptions. For example, Snell's law doesn't hold for a linear birefringent crystal



    thats because its not a law that regulate crystal birefringents. it is known that it doesnt cover crystal birefringements.
  16. Narc Naturally Camouflaged [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Yet I'm not the guy who puts a period three lines after every post. Go figure.

    I wouldn't expect you to understand how a man needs a bit of extra space for certain things.


    .
  17. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Narc I wouldn't expect you to understand how a man needs a bit of extra space for certain things.


    .

    It is not necessary at all. Seems to be OCD. Are you able to make a post without your "signature"? Would it cause you anxiety to not do it?
  18. Originally posted by Obbe It is not necessary at all. Seems to be OCD. Are you able to make a post without your "signature"? Would it cause you anxiety to not do it?

    hes so bland and generic that the only way he can stand out is via his sig.
  19. Chairman Takeshi Kaga African Astronaut
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny

    thats because its not a law that regulate crystal birefringents. it is known that it doesnt cover crystal birefringements.

    No, it means all laws are built on assumptions. "Assuming W X and Y are true then Z".

    Where those assumptions don't hold, those laws don't hold.
  20. Originally posted by Chairman Takeshi Kaga No, it means all laws are built on assumptions. "Assuming W X and Y are true then Z".

    Where those assumptions don't hold, those laws don't hold.



    no. snells law made it very clear what it applies to and what it doesnt apply to.

    very clear.
Jump to Top