User Controls
The MP5 is the greatest weapon in modern warfare
-
2017-02-24 at 1:56 AM UTCLight, accurate automatic fire, cheap and common calibre plus 99% of the time if you're in the military, you're firing at some raghead who definitely isn't wearing L2a.
-
2017-02-24 at 2 AM UTClol did you just play call of duty for the first time you fuckin noob?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-02-24 at 2:11 AM UTC
Originally posted by Captain Falcon Light,
false; (compared to the general consensus of what is 'heavy' in relation to other similar firearms)
Originally posted by Captain Falcon accurate automatic fire,
false; in its entirety. a full-auto SMG is stupid anyway unless youre a gang banger.
Originally posted by Captain Falcon cheap
absolutely false; HK charges some of the highest prices for its products. those fuckers are ridiculous in what they charge
Originally posted by Captain Falcon common calibre…
9mm is shit. why no .45? 10mm? (yes, there is a 10mm...but not in common production) the .40 is not only shit, but bitch-shit for the sissy crowd that cant handle 10mm. they selected 9mm for its nato approval. yes, 9mm in a SMG/PDW is slightly 'hotter' and has better performance than pistol 9mm...but its still shit...
Originally posted by Captain Falcon …plus 99% of the time if you're in the military, you're firing at some raghead who definitely isn't wearing L2a.
99% of statistics are made up. you should edit your post and delete this entire part.
Originally posted by Captain Falcon …L2a.
you really went there. 9mm is shit for unarmored targets...a winter jacket is enough damper a 9mm. did i mention 9mm is shit?
and...MP5 is not the greatest weapon for anything. its a well-built compromise.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-02-24 at 2:44 AM UTCI really like the G11 and P90 from an engineering standpoint
-
2017-02-24 at 3:22 AM UTC
-
2017-02-24 at 3:23 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock false; (compared to the general consensus of what is 'heavy' in relation to other similar firearms)
false; in its entirety. a full-auto SMG is stupid anyway unless youre a gang banger.
absolutely false; HK charges some of the highest prices for its products. those fuckers are ridiculous in what they charge
9mm is shit. why no .45? 10mm? (yes, there is a 10mm…but not in common production) the .40 is not only shit, but bitch-shit for the sissy crowd that cant handle 10mm. they selected 9mm for its nato approval. yes, 9mm in a SMG/PDW is slightly 'hotter' and has better performance than pistol 9mm…but its still shit…
99% of statistics are made up. you should edit your post and delete this entire part.
you really went there. 9mm is shit for unarmored targets…a winter jacket is enough damper a 9mm. did i mention 9mm is shit?
and…MP5 is not the greatest weapon for anything. its a well-built compromise.
Tl;dr
Clearly a post from a hater who doesn't understand weaponz -
2017-02-24 at 3:45 AM UTCThe greatest weapon in modern warfare is the Soviet RDS-220 hydrogen bomb, Tsar Bomba (codename: Ivan).
Weight 27,000 kg (60,000 lb)
Length 8 m (26 ft)
Diameter 2.1 m (6.9 ft)
Blast Yield: 50 megatons
Potential Blast Yield: 100 megatons
The Tsar Bomba was a three-stage bomb with Trutnev-Babaev second and third stage design, with a yield of 50 megatons. This is equivalent to about 1,570 times the combined energy of the bombs that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 10 times the combined energy of all the conventional explosives used in World War II. A three-stage H-bomb uses a fission bomb primary to compress a thermonuclear secondary, as in most H-bombs, and then uses energy from the resulting explosion to compress a much larger additional thermonuclear stage. There is evidence that the Tsar Bomba had several third stages rather than a single very large one.
The initial three-stage design was capable of yielding approximately 100 Mt, but it would have caused too much nuclear fallout and the plane delivering the bomb would not have enough time to escape the explosion. To limit fallout, the third stage and possibly the second stage had a lead tamper instead of a uranium-238 fusion tamper (which greatly amplifies the reaction by fissioning uranium atoms with fast neutrons from the fusion reaction). This eliminated fast fission by the fusion-stage neutrons, so that approximately 97% of the total yield resulted from thermonuclear fusion alone (as such, it was one of the "cleanest" nuclear bombs ever created, generating a very low amount of fallout relative to its yield).
Post last edited by -SpectraL at 2017-02-24T03:50:05.464033+00:00The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-02-24 at 3:59 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL The greatest weapon in modern warfare is the Soviet RDS-220 hydrogen bomb, Tsar Bomba (codename: Ivan).
Weight 27,000 kg (60,000 lb)
Length 8 m (26 ft)
Diameter 2.1 m (6.9 ft)
Blast Yield: 50 megatons
Potential Blast Yield: 100 megatons
The Tsar Bomba was a three-stage bomb with Trutnev-Babaev second and third stage design, with a yield of 50 megatons. This is equivalent to about 1,570 times the combined energy of the bombs that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 10 times the combined energy of all the conventional explosives used in World War II. A three-stage H-bomb uses a fission bomb primary to compress a thermonuclear secondary, as in most H-bombs, and then uses energy from the resulting explosion to compress a much larger additional thermonuclear stage. There is evidence that the Tsar Bomba had several third stages rather than a single very large one.
The initial three-stage design was capable of yielding approximately 100 Mt, but it would have caused too much nuclear fallout and the plane delivering the bomb would not have enough time to escape the explosion. To limit fallout, the third stage and possibly the second stage had a lead tamper instead of a uranium-238 fusion tamper (which greatly amplifies the reaction by fissioning uranium atoms with fast neutrons from the fusion reaction). This eliminated fast fission by the fusion-stage neutrons, so that approximately 97% of the total yield resulted from thermonuclear fusion alone (as such, it was one of the "cleanest" nuclear bombs ever created, generating a very low amount of fallout relative to its yield).
Post last edited by -SpectraL at 2017-02-24T03:50:05.464033+00:00
the only real response in this thread
(except for me mocking captain falcon) -
2017-02-24 at 4:24 AM UTC
Originally posted by greenplastic the only real response in this thread
(except for me mocking captain falcon)
Your mockery sucks. Also I'm high as shit so I can't give this thread the necessary commitment I usually do to my trolling. Otherwise I would have written a proper response post to Bill the Fat and sucked him into a long argument... but I'm justt not feelin it sadly FeelsBadMan -
2017-02-24 at 5:55 AM UTC
-
2017-02-24 at 5:55 AM UTC
-
2017-02-24 at 6:03 AM UTC
-
2017-02-24 at 6:06 AM UTChks guns are expensive as dick and so are fn hersztal
-
2017-02-24 at 7:10 AM UTC
-
2017-02-24 at 2:09 PM UTC
Originally posted by Captain Falcon Your mockery sucks. Also I'm high as shit so I can't give this thread the necessary commitment I usually do to my trolling. Otherwise I would have written a proper response post to Bill the Fat and sucked him into a long argument… but I'm justt not feelin it sadly FeelsBadMan
what a fucking drug addict. too high to function. it's a shame you waste your days getting high and wasting your life away. go play more call of duty loser -
2017-02-24 at 2:15 PM UTC
-
2017-02-24 at 2:16 PM UTCAnd I'm not wasting shit, I'm a psychonaut on a rocket ship to the 8th dimension, what are you up to?
-
2017-02-24 at 2:16 PM UTCAND IT'S COUNTER STRIKE YOU FAGGOT REEEEEEEEE
-
2017-02-24 at 2:42 PM UTC
-
2017-02-24 at 3:03 PM UTCNobody makes real 10mm ammunition. Buffalo bore and Underwood and nobody sells it. The best ammo you can get from stores is like Hornady which is overrated.
