User Controls
Posts by Meikai
-
2020-11-03 at 1:48 AM UTC in Best sounding racial slurs?"Nigger" is pretty much a perfect racial slur. I mean aside from the fact that it is the most taboo slur in our culture (aside from maybe "kike"), it also sounds like a profession. It could be a noun that describes an action. Like the person you're calling a "nigger" is guilty of "nigging". "Niggers gonna nig", you know?
-
2020-11-03 at 12:51 AM UTC in its no orgasm novemberI wonder if the concept of No Nut November is going to have a noticeable impact on the prevalence of babies born in August.
-
2020-11-03 at 12:50 AM UTC in its no orgasm novemberDick Her Down December, when you release all the pent up Nut from November on/in your unsuspecting girlfriend.
-
2020-11-03 at 12:26 AM UTC in Who should I vote for 2020
-
2020-11-02 at 10:24 PM UTC in Is God real?
-
2020-11-02 at 9:11 AM UTC in NIS biggest pseudo-intellectual moron
-
2020-11-02 at 7:57 AM UTC in Revive the Old Gods
Originally posted by aldra Yeah I heard reports they had friends in high places in the Soviet military willing to liquidate their stockpiles, but never any specifics.
They put a lot of energy into becoming self-sufficient though; they somehow attracted a lot more well-educated doctors and engineers than most similar cults. As far as I know they never actually bought chemical weapons (aside from those virus samples) but synthed them and built the delivery systems themselves, which is probably why they fucked up that subway attack - it was a very early effort compared to state bioweapons programmes at the time. When they got raided they were building/buying hardware to construct their own rifles, grenades etc. from their own designs
Disappointing to think that if I'd joined Aum back in the day, I'd probably have just been one of those retards sitting in a box buried in the ground starving myself to death out of religious devotion and not at all involved with any of the cool stuff like weapons procurement/design/manufacture. -
2020-11-02 at 6:02 AM UTC in Who should I vote for 2020
-
2020-11-02 at 5:44 AM UTC in Is God real?To put it in more religious terms, for god to be scientifically proven humanity would have to have the power to control god enough to make repeated and on-demand observations of him. And that sounds pretty fucking haram/heretical/very ungood/go-directly-to-hell-do-not-pass-go-do-not-collect-76-virgins. Science is sacrilege. Burn the witch!
-
2020-11-02 at 5:36 AM UTC in Is God real?
Originally posted by Sudo ITT a tranny trolls by declaring he/she knows what all scientists/bientists are thinking
ITT a tranny tells the truth by saying that even if scientists believe in god and believe they're unraveling the mystery of god through science, they've deluded themselves if they think science is valid tool to prove the existence of god. God literally telling them he exists in person as a glowing 18' foot penis wreathed in fire would not be scientific proof of god, unless they could force god to be an 18' foot penis wreathed in fire on command so as to make their empirical observation a repeatable one. Not a system equipped for dealing with the supernatual, like I said. -
2020-11-02 at 5:18 AM UTC in Is God real?
Originally posted by Kev you need to stop dabbling in absolutes, its the source of your confusion. you cannot prove a gene for black feathers cannot exist any more than you can prove any negative. genes mutate, new species arrive, new evidence falsifies old theories.
Octarine colored pajamas don't exist. -
2020-11-02 at 5:12 AM UTC in NIS biggest pseudo-intellectual moronI'm seriously disappointed by how few polls I make it onto (ho ho that's what she said amiright fellas?). I deserve an honorary place on this one.
-
2020-11-02 at 5:11 AM UTC in Is God real?
Originally posted by Kev you can show me a white swan every day until we are pensioners on our deathbed, that will never prove that black swans cannot exist.
Correct. Which is why I wouldn't do it by showing you white swans, I'd do it by showing you that a gene for black feathers cannot exist. Or that it's impossible for the color black to exist. Because I'm not talking about showing you white swans, I'm talking about showing you that the underlying principles which govern the appearance of swans do not allow for the existence of a black swan. Which by the transitive property would necessitate also accepting that a black swan does not exist, thereby proving the negative claim that "black swans do not exist". -
2020-11-02 at 5:05 AM UTC in Is God real?
-
2020-11-02 at 4:57 AM UTC in Is God real?
Originally posted by Sudo These six assumptions are common to all the disciplines, to all scientists:
Nature is orderly, and the laws of nature describe that order. …
We can know nature. …
All phenomena have natural causes. …
Nothing is self evident. …
Knowledge is derived from acquisition of experience. …
Knowledge is superior to ignorance.
https://www.news24.com/news24/MyNews24/Understanding-science-scientific-assumptions-20140627
Ok so you were wrong. Please don't be hard on yourself.
I'm really trying not to explode because I'm self aware enough to realize everything about this conversation, especially WHO WE BOTH ARE makes it even more ridiculous and it's funny but also amazing. I Love you and that's proof that God exists because neither of us should be capable of Love.
-
2020-11-02 at 4:56 AM UTC in Is God real?
Originally posted by Kev no, when someone doesnt provide proof for his positive claim, the claim is assumed to be untrue by default. this is called the null hypothesis.
the uneducated do it the other way around and assume every crackpot theory true until it is disproved.
None of this changes the fact that you can prove that something doesn't exist by proving it cannot exist though. "X cannot exist" is a positive claim that one can provide evidence for, and when proven necessitates the acceptance that "X doesn't exist" is true. For example you could prove that a proposed stable element does not exist by showing that the physical properties of the proposed stable element defy the laws of physics. -
2020-11-02 at 4:39 AM UTC in Is God real?
Originally posted by Sudo Show me where it is written in your ANCHUNT SCIENCE TOME
J-just google "basic assumptions of science". They are the foundation and the guiding principles that lead all scientific thought. If god exists, science was only ever intended to explain his creations - not god himself. -
2020-11-02 at 4:34 AM UTC in Is God real?
Originally posted by Sudo Oh so we're declaring what we believe universal assumptions of science are now?
I'm just declaring what the universal assumptions of science are, which make it an unfit tool for addressing issues pertaining to the existence of god. Doesn't mean god isn't real, doesn't mean science is useless, just means science can't prove it because it's outside the scope of what science is meant to address. Any "science" that could address the issue of god would not be science by our modern definition of it. Words have meanings. -
2020-11-02 at 4:20 AM UTC in Revive the Old Gods
Originally posted by STER0S do you know if he had any international influence [i.e. russia] to pursue all these plans to overthrow the japanese government with all these human-pesticides?
sometimes i like to think because he was visually disabled & always doped up on lsd somehow the russians or whoever duped him into getting involved with all this shit & was just using him as a pawn since he was visually impaired. [i'm not sure if i used that term correctly] so they can pursue their evil deeds against western society.
who knows, though – maybe the guy was just an evil 100% sociopathic asshole and all this shit was entirely his his idea.
i wish there was more info on his trip to russia [i.e.] what was discussed with government officials.
They got most of their Russian stuff as surplus post-Soviet collapse. -
2020-11-02 at 4:17 AM UTC in Why are people who join the military so retarded?
Originally posted by Speedy Parker And yet they still have retards that volunteer for the armed forces. You know, that thing Roddenberry's entire work of fiction revolves around called Starfleet.
Starfleet isn't the armed forces. They're explorers and diplomats. They only have weapons because the universe is hostile.
