2017-07-18 at 10:21 PM UTC
in
I'm about to go jail
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
Once they know it's in there, they get a warrant for your asshole. Then a doctor is called and the white gloves come on and the doctor goes on a treasure hunt.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-07-18 at 2:39 AM UTC
in
How do you dress?
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
Long robe, pointed hat, curled-toe boots.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
Or the items are haunted, and they don't want to plague anyone else with the poltergeists. If you threw the monkey's paw away in the trash, I'm sure you wouldn't want someone else digging it up.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-07-18 at 2:05 AM UTC
in
I'm about to go jail
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
Originally posted by Totse 2001
does this make alcohol?
No. It's just an internal smuggling ploy. You can also sneak meat out of the guards' freezer locker, like sirloin steaks, and roll them up and bag them and sink them in the coffee and tea jugs to get them over to the dorm. Then you get a guy from the kitchen to cook them for you later, when you know security will be lax.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-07-14 at 8:36 PM UTC
in
Inbox all fucked up
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
RisiR will NOT be denied.
*bump for RisiR vindication*
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-07-17 at 4:07 AM UTC
in
G/F going to far?
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
Unless you want constant nagging and bitching, you better listen to her.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
Originally posted by Kinkou
hes been trying to remember his password for a long mf time and i am really sad about his absence
Plz RESSURECT BRANDON!
You must be brandon.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
Originally posted by Lanny
yeah "autoded" fits too
Shoot, this is hard
seppuku
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
Originally posted by Piles of Crack
Last day on earth
Where are you going?
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-07-13 at 4:29 PM UTC
in
LANNY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
18 U.S. Code § 1466A - Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A(a)In General.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
(1)
(A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B) is obscene; or
(2)
(A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and
(B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value;
or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(1), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.
(b)Additional Offenses.—Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly possesses a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
(1)
(A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B) is obscene; or
(2)
(A) depicts an image that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in graphic bestiality, sadistic or masochistic abuse, or sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; and
(B) lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value;
or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 2252A(b)(2), including the penalties provided for cases involving a prior conviction.
©Nonrequired Element of Offense.—
It is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exist.
(d)Circumstances.—The circumstance referred to in subsections (a) and (b) is that—
(1) any communication involved in or made in furtherance of the offense is communicated or transported by the mail, or in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, or any means or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce is otherwise used in committing or in furtherance of the commission of the offense;
(2) any communication involved in or made in furtherance of the offense contemplates the transmission or transportation of a visual depiction by the mail, or in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer;
(3) any person travels or is transported in interstate or foreign commerce in the course of the commission or in furtherance of the commission of the offense;
(4) any visual depiction involved in the offense has been mailed, or has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, or was produced using materials that have been mailed, or that have been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer; or
(5) the offense is committed in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States or in any territory or possession of the United States.
(e)Affirmative Defense.—It shall be an affirmative defense to a charge of violating subsection (b) that the defendant—
(1) possessed less than 3 such visual depictions; and
(2) promptly and in good faith, and without retaining or allowing any person, other than a law enforcement agency, to access any such visual depiction—
(A) took reasonable steps to destroy each such visual depiction; or
(B) reported the matter to a law enforcement agency and afforded that agency access to each such visual depiction.
(f)Definitions.—For purposes of this section—
(1) the term “visual depiction” includes undeveloped film and videotape, and data stored on a computer disk or by electronic means which is capable of conversion into a visual image, and also includes any photograph, film, video, picture, digital image or picture, computer image or picture, or computer generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means;
(2) the term “sexually explicit conduct” has the meaning given the term in section 2256(2)(A) or 2256(2)(B); and
(3) the term “graphic”, when used with respect to a depiction of sexually explicit conduct, means that a viewer can observe any part of the genitals or pubic area of any depicted person or animal during any part of the time that the sexually explicit conduct is being depicted.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-07-13 at 4:59 PM UTC
in
LANNY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
Any person who, in a circumstance described in subsection (d), knowingly produces, distributes, receives, or possesses with intent to distribute, a visual depiction of any kind, including a drawing, cartoon, sculpture, or painting, that—
(1)
(A) depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(B) is obscene
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
If you search for "-SpectraL", that gives you a blank page with no results, because in a Boolean search the "-" descriptor means "do not search for". :) But if you search for "SpectraL" you get closer. If you search for SpectraL Zoklet, or SpectraL Totse you then get very warm.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-07-12 at 3:42 PM UTC
in
Lazy ass cunts
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
There's the rare good ones still left out there, but finding one would be like finding a needle in a haystack. These days, they just want to manipulate and dominate and basically act like men. Liars. Connivers. No integrity. Self-absorbed. Selfish. Self-righteous. I know I won't ever date a woman who behaves like a man, and I never have.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
Turn your PC monitor upside down.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
Ray Bradbury
Isaac Asimov
John Milton
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
People have to realize that just because they are useless in many fields, that doesn't directly translate to they are useless in all fields. A person may be stupid in math, science, art, and so forth, but at the same time be a genius in some other field, such as sports. If you are stupid in a lot of fields, you just need to find the one you are a genius in. There's not one person on the planet who is not a genius at something, they just need to find out what it is. But if you give up trying to find out what it is, that's on your energy level, not your actual capabilities.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-07-08 at 3:16 AM UTC
in
Recommend me a book...
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2017-06-15 at 2:40 PM UTC
in
ATTN: Lanny
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
Originally posted by Michael Myers
KEK. Good one Speccy.
I was just kidding, Myers. You're OK.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
Originally posted by greenplastic
What's the mechanism that prevents you from being born if you lack the potential to be a genius?
Natural selection.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
Sometimes, the bylaw will chase you off, because they want the City to steal that money for themselves. They'll use your tax dollars to get trucks around bright and early every morning to collect it and sell it all for themselves, and they don't like you getting your hands on the money before they can get to it.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
