stl1, that happens irregardless of race. There's many disadvantaged white kids. It's been 60 years since the civil rights era. Most Vietnam refugees have done extremely well since then despite starting with nothing and often suffering as severe "racism" as blacks.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Individuals are either successful or unsuccessful. At this point in time of society, if you're unsuccessful, you're doing something wrong, regardless of your skin tone. There's a big fuss over nothing. It's really not that difficult to see. It's not up to whitey to help darkey make good choices in their lives. Many lower-tier immigrant groups have successfully done it. The opportunities are there.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Systematic racism ended in the 60's with the repeal of segregation etc. It doesn't exist anymore. Stay in school. Work hard. Don't do drugs. Wake up early. Show me a black man that does that, and I'll show you a successful black man.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
There is no more telling proof of the undeserved impoverishment of POC and the undeserved enrichment of white people than the massive difference in the average wealth of white versus Black and Latino families.
This is the entire premise of systematic racism. However it falls flat in the face of Chinese and Hindus who fare better economically than white families. The opportunities have always been there for blacks. They've ignored them. Correlation is not causation. The entire systematic racism lie is based on that correlation. And it's not the job of white people to help blacks. It's the right of every individual to do what's best for them and their family. Just because whitey does better than you gives you no right to leech. Again systematic racism relies on the premise of white vs black, which doesn't exist. Its every man and woman for themselves and their loved ones in this world vs everyone else. Not white vs blacks ID politics shit. It simply doesn't exist beyond an imaginary concepts.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
I'm for free healthcare, a living minimum wage, anti-prohibitionist, etc. but we can only secure these rights for our own nationals. Attempting to give all these rights to the entire world is futile.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Don't keep your money in a savings account. Their interest gainings are less than inflation. Buy gold and stash it somewhere. It'll only increase in value.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Lol. All the people on the fence are disgusted by the liberal protesters. Many think alike Joe Rogan who dislikes Biden more than Trump. Trumps going to win in a land slide. 120k dead lol. 60k from the common flu in a bad year. All weak people with few years to live anyhow. Most people still fail to know someone close infected with corona.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
You've got sand niggers and wiggers, spicgers too.
Where I live, our natives are the equivalent of niggers. Maybe 1 - 2% of the population is African-Canadian. 10% of population is west indian. Probably 10% east indian too, but they're not quite niggers. Firstly the natives are segregated. Secondly, they're stereotypically on drugs (lots of crack, meth, and heroin). They're dis proportionally represented in crime statistics. Unemployment is high.
Though they're a bit different too. They all receive universal basic income from their tribes (due to lucrative deals from some of North America's most expensive properties being located on their reservations). The UBI just fuels their drug and unemployment epidemics too.
So I get what you're saying. You don't have to be a nigg to be a nogg.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Technologist
I wonder how many people will head down there just because of the alert.
Drama class pulled that stunt on us at high school. Told us there was a car crash at the corner and people to stay away (of course it was a DUI prevention stunt). Of course everybody came to see their little act with the fire department.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Yes. Same in USA. If you were allowed to own arms for your protection from government, they'd allow you to own fully automatic arms. How else would you defend against government agents armed with fully automatic arms? All they let you do is defend yourself from niggers, crackheads, and to train for the day you get drafted. In Canada we don't have these problems to that extent, so they don't allow firearms for self defence.
But yes the right is more extensive in the USA. If you tell a cop in Canada that you own guns specifically for self defence, you risk having your license revoked. Only three legal reasons for owning in Canada. Collecting, sport shooting and hunting. With this ban, collecting and sports shooting just took big hits. Gun clubs are liable to close, many of them survived because it was the only legal place to shoot an AR15. Big hits are coming to conservation revenue as a result. Not to mention the Long Gun registry here failed miserably after wasting billions of dollar of tax payer money. That was only to register guns. Now try to get 200k+ guns handed in and destroyed. With a government that's already near bankruptcy due to covid. It ain't going to happen.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
This does nothing but affect law abiding shooters. What's more baffling is why they continued their strategy of banning guns based on looks. The SKS remains legal, while the AR15 got banned. The tavor remains legal, and the BAR rifles. All designed for military use. M1 Garand stays legal, M14 got banned, despite having near exact functionality.
The scary thing with gun grabbers are, it is the one right you have, that you can exercize to protect your other rights. Once the right to firearms ownership is gone, all your other rights are easily up for grabs.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Firekrochfatty
All a cop really has to do is shoot someone in the hand or foot, and aggression stops pretty quickly. If not, you have more hands and more feet. or a knee.
If the cop is at least average with a gun, he can do just that. If he can't hit these things, he really needs to start looking for another line of work….
Killing pretty much never needs to happen….
Also, pressure points are an amazing use of non-lethal force. I never see anyone use them anymore. They work like a mother-fucker, and make someone scream and beg in pain…
No. You don't pull a gun unless you're prepared to use it. Else the courts will give the cop shit. Why did you use lethal force to wound him? Because you're not supposed to use lethal force unless your life it at stake, you're supposed to shoot to kill always. Yes I know it's stupid but it's how it works.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by WellHung
The nigger had a bat, not a gun. The nigger was being stupid, but the nigger should have been tazed, not shot to death.
Bastard was tazed. Didn't work on him. Cops need to get back to the basics. Fucking batons. That's what they're for. Non-lethal. Trained in it's use. Guy with a bat has no chance. Give him a good whack in the head. Knock him out without killing him.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
