User Controls
Posts by MexicanMasterRace
-
2020-05-15 at 6:53 AM UTC in 🍬🍬Candy~Land🍬🍬CandyRein is a nigger.
-
2020-05-15 at 6:23 AM UTC in 🍬🍬Candy~Land🍬🍬The hell you gotta bring yea into this for
-
2020-05-15 at 5:59 AM UTC in 🍬🍬Candy~Land🍬🍬Yeah that was uncalled for
-
2020-05-15 at 5:35 AM UTC in Krotz rides the short bus on his way to work
-
2020-05-15 at 5:33 AM UTC in China is a problem. What can be done?
-
2020-05-15 at 5:28 AM UTC in 🍬🍬Candy~Land🍬🍬DADDY DO YOU WANT
-
2020-05-15 at 5:27 AM UTC in Krotz rides the short bus on his way to workEven in your imaginary insulting situation where Bill Krozby is a loser, he's still less of a loser than you are or ever will be.
-
2020-05-15 at 5:25 AM UTC in 🍬🍬Candy~Land🍬🍬
-
2020-05-15 at 5:25 AM UTC in 🍬🍬Candy~Land🍬🍬
-
2020-05-15 at 4:08 AM UTC in Let’s see what really happened, shall wetotse doesn't exist.
-
2020-05-15 at 4:07 AM UTC in China is a problem. What can be done?Give Hong Kong nukes too
-
2020-05-15 at 4:06 AM UTC in 🍬🍬Candy~Land🍬🍬fire bucket sounds like what the native americans would call a grill
-
2020-05-15 at 12:07 AM UTC in Viruses have rights
-
2020-05-15 at 12:07 AM UTC in Everyone's favorite porn!?!?!?You can be both, faggot.
-
2020-05-14 at 11:52 PM UTC in Everyone's favorite porn!?!?!?CandyRein is a homophobe
-
2020-05-14 at 11:35 PM UTC in Let’s see what really happened, shall we
Originally posted by Ernst Kaltenbrunner shut your gibbering cock slot, you cum drunk retard.
i was there. i posted pics on totse-1
the niggers had a WEEK notice to gtfo and they decided to stay. nigger nagin (who is currently in prison, last i checked) told his nigger ilk to gtfo.
the best part is there are countless niggers that were put down by good white folk and last i heard not a single good white folk was investigated, much less indicted. not counting the cops that were using the niggers for target practice…that was just a giant set-up
I dont see any pics, joonose -
2020-05-14 at 10:25 PM UTC in Ineffable reality textures
-
2020-05-14 at 10:24 PM UTC in Reminder that we have hard evidence that Wariat is a pedophile
-
2020-05-14 at 10:23 PM UTC in Does all alcohol have the same drunk?
Originally posted by Obbe Exactly how and when did life on Earth originate? Science is currently unable to answer this, that does not mean an answer does not exist.
How does accretion form planetary systems? Where did Earth's water come from? Science currently doesn't know, that does not mean there is no reason.
Is Feynmanium the last chemical element that can physically exist? That is, what are the chemical consequences of having an element with an atomic number above 137, whose 1s electrons must travel faster than the speed of light? Science doesn't know, but the answer must exist.
I could keep going. The amount of truth out there that science has not proven is far greater than the truth it has has.
I didn't say 'prove it with science we already know.' I said "If you can't prove it with science it doesn't exist." Just because you can't do something NOW doesn't mean you can't do it at some point in the future.
I maintain that everything can be proven by science even if we do not currently know. The existence of God, how life formed, everything. We reach new scientific breakthroughs on a regular basis. Humans are always searching for knowledge.
We've been studying alcohol for god knows how long. Nobody has ever found anything that would give different boozes different effects, except for absinthe but the psychoactives in there are added afterwards and not part of the distillation process. -
2020-05-14 at 10:14 PM UTC in Reminder that we have hard evidence that Wariat is a pedophilehttp://ca.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20110628_0004326.CA.htm/qx
If someone wants to pay the 8 dollars we can get the whole case file.The People v. Maciej Wieslaw Lata
June 28, 2011
THE PEOPLE, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT,
v.
MACIEJ WIESLAW LATA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
(Super. Ct. No. 09NCR07158)
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Nicholson , Acting P. J.
P. v. Lata
CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
An information alleged the 24-year-old defendant Maciej Wieslaw Lata had contacted and arranged meetings, by way of the so-called "MySpace" Web site on the Internet, with a 12-year-old minor with the intent to commit an act of molestation. Pursuant to a negotiated plea, the prosecutor amended the information to include a count of misdemeanor child annoyance, to which defendant entered his plea of guilty in exchange for dismissal of three permutations of section 288 felonies and the grant of probation conditioned on a jail term of less than 180 days. The offense subjected defendant to mandatory registration as a sex offender. (Pen. Code, § 290, subd. © [undesignated section references will be to this code].)
At the sentencing hearing (which went untranscribed because it was held on the misdemeanor calendar), defendant objected to the registration requirement on a basis not specified in the court's minutes. The court granted probation in accordance with the agreed disposition, imposing the registration requirement. Defendant filed a notice of appeal without requesting a certificate of probable cause (CPC).
Defendant's sole argument on appeal is that the mandatory registration requirement for child annoyance violates his right to equal protection because section 290 does not also include solicitation for prostitution within its ambit even though the proscribed conduct could be similar. We affirm the order granting probation.
Our resolution of the issue does not require consideration of the factual basis for defendant's plea. We thus omit it.
DISCUSSION
The People initially contend the constitutionality of defendant's registration requirement is not an issue cognizable on appeal because he did not obtain a CPC. This mandatory consequence of his guilty plea is not a negotiable element of his plea, and therefore a challenge to it is not tantamount to an attack on the validity of his plea that would otherwise be subject to a CPC prerequisite. (People v. Hernandez (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 641, 647-648 [disapproved in People v. Picklesimer (2010) 48 Cal.4th 330, 338, fn. 4, as to holding that challenge to registration requirement can be via postjudgment motion]; cf. People v. McClellan (1993) 6 Cal.4th 367, 380 [imposition of registration requirement did not violate terms of plea because it is not a subject of negotiation]; see 6 Witkin & Epstein, Cal. Criminal Law (3d ed. 2011 supp.), Criminal Appeal, § 16, p. 67.)
The right to equal protection under the law (U.S. Const., 14th Amend.; Cal. Const., art. I, § 7), is the right to be treated similarly to those who are similarly situated. (People v. Jones (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 220, 227; People v. Hofsheier (2006) 37 Cal.4th 1185, 1199 (Hofsheier).) One who claims a violation of this right therefore has the essential prerequisite of demonstrating that a legislative classification affects two or more similarly situated groups differently. (Hofsheier, supra, 37 Cal.4th at p. 1199; In re Randy J. (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 1497, 1506.)
"Legislative classification is the act of specifying who will and who will not come within the operation of a particular law." (Connerly v. State Personnel Bd. (2001) 92 Cal.App.4th 16, 32.)
As an initial matter, we note that the principles of equal protection do not apply where identical conduct is subject to prosecution under more than one statute, resulting in different punishments for different defendants. This is simply a function of prosecutorial discretion. (People v. Honan (2010) 186 Cal.App.4th 175, 183; People v. Taylor (2001) 93 Cal.App.4th 318, 323; see Manduley v. Superior Court …
