User Controls
Posts by park police
-
2019-07-31 at 7:41 PM UTC in Get in an Argument with the Poster Above You.What if we were immortal, and we could flood internet forums with an endless supply of nonsensical low iq drivel, and ride on magical unicorns when we aren't doing that? We could do it forever! Until the internet dies.
-
2019-07-31 at 7:40 PM UTC in Douglas Monks arrested for raping 4 under age girls!
Originally posted by Bill Krozby Oh ok.. couldnt you just spell out couple? Is it that hard lmao
People tend to be lazy on this site. That's why in tinychat, people would rather talk through a microphone than type. For one, a lot of people don't touch-type, and they're lazy on top of that.
This site is a watered down extra shitty extra lazy low iq version of totse. Probably not Lanny's fault though. I blame the feds. -
2019-07-31 at 7:30 PM UTC in Which NIS Member Is This?I know a guy who robbed a bank and got away with it. He got away by getting on a bus lmao
Later he confessed to it cause they got him for something else, but that's still hilarious that he was able to escape by getting on a bus. -
2019-07-31 at 7:21 PM UTC in This place is ripe with wizards filled with rage and angst at the worldAnd one more thing, this is interesting... Apparently there's a correlation between being anti-social and the electrodermal response of being stared at. The more anti-social a person is, the more likely their body is to respond to being stared at. I would guess it's something to do with not over-using that sense. Highly social people are going to be naturally less sensitive to this because they're perceived with eyes and ears more often.
-
2019-07-31 at 7:03 PM UTC in If I was an AI how would I know?Everyone's mind is partly AI already. Doesn't matter if you're confined to a biological system or not. Super computers can make your decisions for you much faster than your 5 kilobit per second brain anyway.
-
2019-07-31 at 6:10 PM UTC in This place is ripe with wizards filled with rage and angst at the worldhttps://books.google.com/books?id=1AJJCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA244&lpg=PA244&dq=william+braud+dmils+san+antonio+tx&source=bl&ots=uSLAi5IOfb&sig=ACfU3U1buZ87MA-wg43DD8f_n1F7BshxSw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwick7r63d_jAhVDWq0KHQx5C04Q6AEwB3oECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=william%20braud%20dmils%20san%20antonio%20tx&f=false
EDIT: I met an Australian author of books like this, but he gave up on it, because he thinks nobody is interested in the subjects. It's partially true, people either tend to not believe it or it's too confusing for them. I couldn't really talk to the guy long I think he was paranoid about being partly famous. But I could've argued with him on the subject, I knew an awful lot more about it than he does. And I'm not an author.As the observed participant has no knowledge of the observation schedule,
no differences would be expected between the two conditions. The remote staring
paradigm investigates whether humans can detect someone staring at them. This idea is
derived from a ‘feeling of being stared at’ which is well known from everyday
experience. This phenomenon has already been researched by individual authors
(e.g. Colwell, Schro¨der, & Sladen, 2000; Schwartz & Russek, 1999; Sheldrake, 1998,
1999, 2000, 2001a), and the results have evoked some controversy (Baker, 2001;
Marks & Colwell, 2001; Schmidt, 2001; Sheldrake, 2001b). The remote staring paradigm
is special in its set-up in that it uses video equipment and takes as the dependent variable
a physiological indicator of arousal rather than a self-report.
In an overall review, Schlitz and Braud (1997) report the results of 19 direct mental
interaction studies with a total of 417 sessions. These show a mean effect size of r ¼ :25
(Rosenthal’s r) with 37% of the studies being independently significant. The authors also
present data for remote staring studies with the same mean effect size ðr ¼ :25Þ for 11
studies with 241 sessions, with 64% yielding significant results. The overall significance
for the two data sets calculated using the Stouffer Z method was p ¼ :0000007
(direct mental interaction) and p ¼ :000054 (remote staring), respectively.
One could conclude that the data indicate the existence of some as yet unknown
effect of distant intentionality. Our goal was to assess whether this strong claim can
stand up to critical evaluation from a sceptical perspective. We also wished to include
new data in our evaluation, as a substantial number of direct mental interaction
experiments have been conducted since the previous review.
And the conclusion:We conclude that for both data sets that there is a small, but significant effect. This result
corresponds to the recent findings of studies on distant healing and the ‘feeling of being
stared at’. Therefore, the existence of some anomaly related to distant intentions cannot
be ruled out. The lack of methodological rigour in the existing database prohibits final
conclusions and calls for further research, especially for independent replications on
larger data sets. There is no specific theoretical conception we know of that can
incorporate this phenomenon into the current body of scientific knowledge. Thus,
theoretical research allowing for and describing plausible mechanisms for such effects is
necessary
Some pedantic jackass will always find that the data collect isn't to his liking, he won't be satisfied and remains a skeptic. That's fine. I have actually seen this stuff in person, I have done it. I can repeatedly stare at someone and induce different emotions in them, making them change direction, etc.
EDIT:The aim of the influence is to either calm, activate, or not influence
Keep in mind these are random people that aren't actually very good at this stuff. You put someone like me or some of the people I know in these experiments and people are going to freak out at the results.
the distant subject according to a prearranged random schedule.
During calming attempts, the influencer relaxes and calms himself or
herself, intends and gently wishes for the subject to become calm,
and visualizes or imagines the subject in a relaxing, calming setting.
During activation attempts, the influencer tenses his or her own body,
intends and wishes for the subject to become more active, and images
the subject in activating, energizing or arousing settings and situations.
During the noninfluence control periods, the influencer attempts to
keep his or her mind off of the subject and to think about matters
unrelated to the experiment. The influencers may use the polygraph
tracings as feedback to indicate how well their influence attempts are
I've gotten good at remotely messing with motors by hearing them. This shit works on anything living or non living. Doesn't matter what it is. The size also doesn't matter much as it works on planes and cars too. Trains are somewhat more difficult to mess with. I don't like using it on people. Sometimes it's an unconscious reflex, you'll see a girl crossing the street and she's about to get hit by a car, you twitch, or whip your head towards her, or squint your eyes, and she stops, milliseconds before getting smashed by a car, and she has no idea why. It's like an act of god sometimes.
EDIT: Humans and other life forms also have the ability to affect probability and the research on this is pretty good too. How likely a dice will land on a certain number, in other words, how likely an event is to happen. That's where it gets even more strange I think. Magic makes use of this ability.
EDIT2: Since they used faraday cages/shields, and couldn't pinpoint an electromagnetic frequency responsible for these effects, my conclusion may be that it works because all is mind, all is one. The distance between any one object or person and another is an illusion. When you affect another person or an object, you're affecting part of yourself. -
2019-07-31 at 6:03 PM UTC in This place is ripe with wizards filled with rage and angst at the world
William was an individual in whose presence paranormal things happened. He told one account in which a book of matches on the table burst spontaneously into fire shortly after an irritating secretary walked through. William said that he investigated the matches meticulously, but found no cause for the fire. Some days later he told this story to a visiting psychologist. As soon as he heard the story, the psychologist asked William, “You weren’t thinking of firing anyone, were you?” (Braud, 1994, p. 301). Only then did William realize the connection between the matches and the secretary, who was not doing a very good job and whom he should have fired.
The old stories about wizards being able to do all sorts of crazy paranormal shit are not entirely fiction. I can consistently cause paranormal things to happen and I'm not the only person. Far from it.William G Braud (1942-2012) considered human consciousness to be the most mysterious phenomenon in the universe, and devoted his career to searching out the enigmatic workings that characterize each of us. Braud completed over 290 written works, including peer reviewed articles, book chapters and three books.1 These focused mainly on parapsychology, consciousness studies, spirituality, exceptional human experiences, and transpersonal studies; they are archived and made available at www.inclusivepsychology.com.
Distant intentionality and the feeling of being
stared at: Two meta-analyses
Stefan Schmidt1
*, Rainer Schneider1
, Jessica Utts2 and
Harald Walach1
1
University Hospital Freiburg, Germany
2
University of California, Davis, USA
http://www.deanradin.com/evidence/Schmidt_DMILS_BJP.pdf
REMOTE MENTAL INFLUENCE OF ELECTRODERMAL ACTIVITY
William G. Braud
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7cf9/b743fd819496370a737f791d7a80e07ee7b0.pdfThe research question to be addressed here is whether it is possible for mental activity of one person to influence the physiological
activity of another person at a distance and under conditions that
preclude conventional sensorimotor interactions and conventional
physical energies. Such questions are typically asked within the
domain known as "parapsychology" or "Psychical research," which
deals with processes such as telepathy and clairvoyance. What is
not appreciated, however, is that these very questions were actively
researched by some of the founders and leading investigators of the
disciplines that we now recognize as psychophysiology and conditioning and learning–disciplines that contributed importantly to the
development of biofeedback and self-regulation research. I'll mention some relevant projects that were undertaken in the early 1900s
in the Soviet Union by researchers who were exploring the newly
discovered "conditional reflexes."
Ivan Pavlov himself addressed some of these issues. Pavlov, to
whom we are all indebted for his brilliant work in classical conditioning, was intensely interested in the various phenomena of hypnosis
and in the unusual physiological and psychological functions manifested in psychiatric patients. In one of his lectures in physiology,
after describing the extremely fine differentiations among conditional
stimuli that dogs are able to make, he continued: "In us, in human
beings, our higher conscious activity runs counter to these lower
abilities to differentiate and hence hinders fine differentiation. That
this is so is demonstrated by the fact that, in some instances, when
man's normal conscious activity is altered, his ability to differentiate
is sharpened. During special states of so-called clairvoyance, the differentiating ability in man reaches infinite sharpness" (Pavlov, 1952,
p. 520).
Vladimir Bekhterev, who made important contributions in what we
now call "instrumental conditioning," was much more actively involved
with these issues. In addition to his better known work in reflexology,
Bekhterev himself conducted laboratory investigations of telepathic
influence in dogs and in remote hypnotic influence of humans (see
Gregory, 1976).In a series of careful experiments, Vasiliev's team was
able to induce motor acts, visual images and sensations, sleeping and
awakening, and physiological reactions (breathing changes, changes
in electrodermal activity) in persons stationed at remote locations and
shielded from all conventional interactions. The methodology of these
experiments included : (a) the use of selected, highly hypnotizable
subjects, (b) objective recording (by means of kymographs), © mechanical randomizers, (d) statistical analyses of results, (e) sensory
isolation, (f) electromagnetic shielding, and (g) variation of the distance between the influencer and the influencee (distances from 20
meters to 1,700 kilometers were used). The general findings were:
(a) the demonstration of positive results, (b) the finding that the effects
survived iron-, lead-, and Faraday- chamber screening, and © the
identification of important psychological factors that could impede or
facilitate the effects.
During this same time frame, similar investigations were being
carried out in other countries. There were French experiment on inducing hypnosis at a distance (by Joire, Gibert, Janet, & Richet),
All this research, oh it can't be real I haven't seen it in person ( I have ) -
2019-07-31 at 5:55 PM UTC in This place is ripe with wizards filled with rage and angst at the worldAUTONOMIC DETECTION OF REMOTE OBSERVATION: TWO CONCEPTUAL REPLICATIONS
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00789R003200140001-1.pdf -
2019-07-31 at 5:49 PM UTC in This place is ripe with wizards filled with rage and angst at the world
Originally posted by aldra find me a single reputable peer-reviewed study
I just mentioned it to you, learn how to google more effectively, or use a better search engine that isn't completely sold out and corrupt maybe.
William Braud's original work was peer-reviewed and replicated in several different countries. Around 15 different studies total I think, all concluding the same thing his studies concluded: That the mind, through observation, has an affect on the things it observes, whether living or non living.
There is a physiological response in every living thing that is observed, normally on an unconscious level. Practitioners of magic, or telepaths, learn to blend the unconscious with the conscious mind through gnosis.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1220802/pg2
His original work, which I'm referring to that was peer reviewed and replicated in several different countries in over 15 studies, was originally done in the 70s. It's pretty old. The US Army also messed with DMILs, of course, and found that they could stunt the growth of mold in petri dishes by focusing negative thoughts on it. They found that it didn't matter if they were staring at it in person or using a camera from a remote location, there was always a negative effect on the growth of the petri dishes which had negative thoughts focused on them.
You're trying to argue with me about something that's been around for decades and proven to be real. What more proof do you need? If you want to be retarded and pedantic and say that isn't enough, that's your choice. But you have a lot to learn on this subject.
https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/2040116767_William_Braud -
2019-07-31 at 12:45 AM UTC in I probably would ______ even though I know I shouldn't.I used to dream about piles of meth crystals and 4MAR crystals. But nowadays it just turns me into a horny lesbian if I smoke it, so I rarely do.
-
2019-07-31 at 12:44 AM UTC in alcohol tripping
-
2019-07-31 at 12:42 AM UTC in Helladamnleet is an emotionally unstable manchild.
Originally posted by Helladamnleet What EXACTLY do you expect from "better living through chemistry" aka the drug forum's official chat?
Well, I'm more used to using IRC. I didn't expect that to be so loud, or to automatically connect to the webcams like that before I'd even joined the chat. I'll have to use headphones or something. I may send some methheads into the chat later. -
2019-07-31 at 12:38 AM UTC in Helladamnleet is an emotionally unstable manchild.I went into tinychat a few minutes ago and Bill Krozby or someone he was talking to blurted out real loud YOU GOTTA GET SOME WEED DUDE and I'm sitting next to some old women. Goddamnit, I had to turn the volume down.
EDIT: but yeah it's pretty lame chat -
2019-07-31 at 12:36 AM UTC in alcohol trippingAlcohol is kind of stupid, but used in a ritual context it's quite brilliant.
-
2019-07-31 at 12:35 AM UTC in This place is ripe with wizards filled with rage and angst at the worldhttps://niggasin.space/thread/35272?p=1
I posted some good info on magic there. It's a national security secret though, like I said. So you aren't really expected to believe me. It's preferred if you don't actually. -
2019-07-31 at 12:26 AM UTC in This place is ripe with wizards filled with rage and angst at the world
Originally posted by mmQ Prove telepathy is real. NOW.
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001700210016-5.pdf
How about you use your brain instead of expecting me to do read everything for you? Use google, read about DMILS and William Braud's work, then try to convince me how they're wrong. Prove to me it isn't real. -
2019-07-31 at 12:17 AM UTC in This place is ripe with wizards filled with rage and angst at the world
Originally posted by aldra lol@ missing the wizard reference and also believing in chaos magic
It's just another part of science we don't fully understand yet. People who are good at it are usually referred to as telepaths, but everyone has telepathic ability to some extent. Google DMILS if you don't believe it. It's thoroughly peer-reviewed that humans can influence matter around them with their consciousness. William Braud was from my city, also. Or at least worked here.
Not being well versed in a subject doesn't mean it's not real. -
2019-07-30 at 11:35 PM UTC in This place is ripe with wizards filled with rage and angst at the world
Originally posted by HTS Nothing personelle, yid.
Seriously though I don't think anyone here qualifies as a wizard.
I do. It's not really that hard, just study chaos magic. Or basic hermetic magic. Same thing for the most part. Same principles. Chaos magic is just old magic that was enhanced with modern science to make it more effective and sort out the bullshit hello kitty magic from the real thing.
Being a magus would be the highest level of wizardry. Magic can be found traditionally all over the world in various forms, and all effective forms are just a manipulation of quantum mechanics through will and consciousness. -
2019-07-30 at 11:24 PM UTC in all is mindI found a paper and smoked some more. Thank jesus I had one left. I think reality is as it is imagined. It's a certain way because people subconsciously imagine it to be that way, and only a few realize it on a conscious level. In ancient times they understood that what we call magic is explained by imagination + will. You could literally imagine it being cloudy, and it'll turn cloudy. Or imagine everyone is slowing down, and they do. Just little examples. Most people aren't great at this instantly, but everyone can do it. The nature of reality is much stranger than people tend to want to believe.
But the power humans have is immense. Eventually they'll have computer brain-interface chips that allow people to amplify these abilities. Chaos will probably ensue.
EDIT: it seems consciousness may not stem from life or matter, but that matter and life may stem from consciousness itself. Then all consciousness is shared and the interconnectedness is inescapable. Consciousness I believe, can actually be used as an energy source to power machines, kind of like in the matrix, but not directly connected to any machine or living thing necessarily. -
2019-07-30 at 9:15 PM UTC in Am I being discretely blocked from 4chan?Music is art, and beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I may be the greatest DJ that ever lived, but that wouldn't mean my taste in music doesn't suck. What if your favorite music is physically bad for you? Who knows that you'll listen to when you're dead.