User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 164
  6. 165
  7. 166
  8. 167
  9. 168
  10. 169
  11. ...
  12. 383
  13. 384
  14. 385
  15. 386

Posts by ORACLE

  1. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    It has nothing to do with the name, it is just a consequence of accepting the rules by declaration, just like no matter what the movement of the knight piece in chess will always have a ratio of one lateral square to two medial squares. Doesn't matter if you call it "knight" or "horse", it's just true within the system because it follows the rules of our declared system.
  2. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Math is the language/symbolism we as humans use to understand and communicate the rule set. Again the rule set exists whether humans do or don't…

    No it doesn't. It's just a formal system, Gödel already proved that there's nothing inherently true about it. Just like chess is a formal system. The rules of chess were invented by humans, doesn't matter if it is still a mathematical structure in itself.

    You seem to be getting hung up on the "name" rather than the rule set…the name is a human construct, the rule set isn't.

    Math…as a set of rules exists regardless of humanity.

    No it has nothing to do with the name but that humans invented maths. It's just a descriptive language. Anything you can model in maths, you can model in the rules of any Turing complete board game.

    It's just a language for modeling abstract relationships. The universe doesn't care what makes sense to you.
  3. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson PI wasn't invented…the circumference of a circle is 3.14 times that of it's radius regardless of if humans are around to discover that fact or not.

    You're only saying that because you want to impose your human constructs upon reality. In actuality there is nothing necessary about pi, for example it is easily proven pi=4 in taxicab geometry.

    http://www.dmf.unicatt.it/~bibsoft/provatesi/siti/Taxicab%20Geometry%20Part%201.htm#:~:text=If%20we%20adopt%20the%20Euclidean,no%20more%20than%20two%20points.
  4. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Checkers was a human construct, the universe wasn't.

    And maths is. Point?
  5. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    It's just a clean description that was useful. Also you are simply confusing physics for pure maths.

    https://vixra.org/abs/1901.0301

    It will show that there is a cross sectional limit, below which 1/r2 asymptotically changes to 1/r. When the cross section of a distant star falls below the cross section of a particle transmitting the gravitational force, such as a graviton, as viewed from a baryon, such as a proton, then the inverse square law is no longer valid.
  6. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Greek Style So something like the inverse square law is only real in your mind?

    It's just a description that makes sense to humans. And in reality the inverse square law is only roughly correct, for example it just doesn't work for something like 80% of galactic bodies.
  7. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Greek Style Mathematical rules are discovered and thoroughly investigated. They aren't invented and kept secret. They aren't made up and then declared beyond doubt, the way woke religious theory is.

    Just saying.

    There's only one way modern computers could work. No other.

    This is wrong, no formal system can be complete and provably true within its rules, as demonstrated by Gödel's incompleteness theorem, including maths.

    Just like you can set up the rules of chess and study different facts about it, maths is just a set of rules humans invented.

    Discovering those rules is among the greatest triumphs of western civilisation.



    Literally invented by Eastern civilizations
  8. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by HTS It is arguably a construct, but I don't know if I'd call it a social construct.

    And really, its status as a construct is famously debateable - mathematical platonism vs intuitionism. 🤔

    Really it's a social construct. For example Andrew Wile didn't even believe himself when he proved Fermat's last theorem: the nature of that truth was and is entirely social.
  9. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson There are sets of rules as to how the universe operates that predate human existence.

    No they don't, just like the game of checkers.
  10. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Can't keep your mind off of cocks huh?

    Can't keep your mouth off cocks huh?
  11. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker You have the number. Call and we can make arrangements for your final destination.

    Show me the lube receipt, I don't want my dick to change while I spelunk my dick down your sphincter
  12. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by -SpectraL The WayBack Machine disagrees with you.

    Actually it agrees with me and proves you wrong.

    Link it.
  13. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Aliens use math too…

    Baseless claim^

    so no it's not a human construct.

    Yes it is. It's just a set of rules.
  14. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny pakis are still indian constructs.

    Actually they're a British construct
  15. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker NY address is a matter of record tough guy. Come on down and be the next victim.

    Buy a barrel of KY so I can lube your ass up before I dump my cum in it
  16. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker I didn't know you were competing. Did you get a shiny trophy little sport?

    Sore loser reply^
  17. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Basically the science is clear: y'all are scientifically retarded
  18. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by -SpectraL There's no documentation or evidence which proves that, which means it's only your opinion.

    https://medical.mit.edu/faqs/COVID-19#faq-9

    Is a person with COVID-19 contagious before symptoms appear?
    Yes, evidence indicates that people who are infected with 2019-nCoV may be at their most contagious in the 48–72 hours before symptoms are noticeable. In addition, it is now estimated that up to 25 percent of infected individuals remain asymptomatic and may unwittingly infect others. For that reason, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is now recommending that individuals wear non-medical-grade, cloth face coverings in public settings where it may be difficult to maintain social distancing, such as grocery stores. If everyone wears masks, this might help prevent those who are unknowingly infected from spreading the illness.
  19. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Math is not a construct. It just is. Gawd you're dumb. I bet you still rely on your parents.

    Math is a human construct just like chess.
  20. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India

    Wikipedia is a social construct
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 164
  6. 165
  7. 166
  8. 167
  9. 168
  10. 169
  11. ...
  12. 383
  13. 384
  14. 385
  15. 386
Jump to Top