User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 163
  6. 164
  7. 165
  8. 166
  9. 167
  10. 168
  11. ...
  12. 383
  13. 384
  14. 385
  15. 386

Posts by ORACLE

  1. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Shut the fuck up faggot
  2. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by -SpectraL MIT takes billions from the bag guys. Sorry, even their documentation can't be trusted, much less their "good word" with no documentation. I didn't just fall off the turnip truck last night, kid.

    Baseless claim to discredit respected authority ^


    Give me evidence from a source that isn't already conflicted and compromised and I'll be only too happy to accept it.

    Every source that doesn't support your stupid opinion is conflicted.

    Folks as you can see, SpectraL has lower cognitive abilities. This proves the opening post without doubt.
  3. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Width-wise
  4. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Before:

    https://web.archive.org/web/20090813041311/http://zoklet.net/bbs/

    After:

    https://web.archive.org/web/20100529093425/http://www.zoklet.net/bbs/

    This is Zoklet not TOTSE, you were just walking in the footsteps of giants from TOTSE.
  5. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Lol eat shit

    Originally posted by ORACLE https://medical.mit.edu/faqs/COVID-19#faq-9

    Is a person with COVID-19 contagious before symptoms appear?
    Yes, evidence indicates that people who are infected with 2019-nCoV may be at their most contagious in the 48–72 hours before symptoms are noticeable. In addition, it is now estimated that up to 25 percent of infected individuals remain asymptomatic and may unwittingly infect others. For that reason, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is now recommending that individuals wear non-medical-grade, cloth face coverings in public settings where it may be difficult to maintain social distancing, such as grocery stores. If everyone wears masks, this might help prevent those who are unknowingly infected from spreading the illness.
  6. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Translation: I don't have any evidence of my preposterous claim.

    Literally saying MIT is lying and wrong ^
  7. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson It's nothing like the rules of chess, you can change the rules of chess as an independent player and as a chess "governing body"

    "ok today the knight can only move 2 places diagonally, that's it…we are changing that rule but the game remains as chess".

    The game would continue with the new rule…that being the knight's move is now 2 places diagonally.

    It's exactly like chess: that's just you niggling about the name "Chess" and which set of rules to apply it to. The current rule set is just a rule set, we just call it chess. It's just a matter of declaration.

    Similarly you can declare that a bishop can only move diagonally and it becomes a fact that it means they can only play on one colour. It's a fact of the rule set, doesn't mean the rule set isn't invented.

    Just like the rules of math are what they are and we call it math: you declare you're using Euclidean geometry and pi will be 3.14.

    However, you can't change the rule as applied to PI…

    Pi being 3.14etc isn't the rule.

    The rule is that we define Pi to be the ratio between the circumference and diameter of a circle. A circle is an object where every point on the perimeter is equidistant from its center. If you assume a flat (Euclidean) space with no curvature, it is 3.14 because it is a consequence of the rules (specifically Euclid's postulates).

    But we don't live in flat space, it's a fictional model invented by humans because it is useful. In curved space it is literally a matter of how it is curved that determines pi.

    "OK as of today the circumference of a circle will measure APPROXIMATELY 2 times that of the radius instead of the previously used 3.14".

    You can make the statement but you can't change the rule…as 2 radius's wouldn't fit…the 3.14 rule would still apply.

    The rule you're arbitrarily changing/clinging to is what geometry to pick.

    It's just a declaration that we pick certain rules, then we can see the consequences.
  8. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    https://physics.illinois.edu/news/article/10665

    But let us not forget that π (the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter) is not actually constant in non-Euclidean geometry.
  9. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny thats just as retarded as saying just because the earth is a ball therefore no flat surfaces or straight horizontal lines are possible on earth.

    Assuming flat space works approximately because the pull of gravity is weak, but you can already see it breaking down as an assumption with GPS technology for example, where it simply would not work in a Newtonian paradigm.

    Similarly, you can work in a flat geometry approximately even on the surface of the earth. For example you have to make 3 90 degree turns in the same rotational direction to return to your starting point locally. But if you walked from the North pole to the equator, turned 90 degrees left, walk some distance, turned 90 degrees left and walk straight, you would return to the North pole.

    Even in that case it's only approximate.
  10. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Irrelevant to the point. That if alien species #491 came up with the same conclusion Euclid did then it's circumference would still be 3.14 (etc) times that of it's radius…the rule is independent of humans…that's the point. The rule would exist regardless of human existence.

    That is "math", doesn't require a perfect circle to exist in nature for that to be a factual rule. And Math can be used on a realistic level to apply to the natural world too as tiny inconsequential differences are just that inconsequential for most applications.

    Just as lots of physics breaks down on the sub atomic level too..it still plays a roll in your daily life as you don't live your life on the sub atomic level.

    Completely relevant to the point as no it wouldn't, they could only construct an approximation because if they constructed a circle it would only approximately have a ratio of pi if it was embedded in flat space. It's not so it won't. It only works when we accept by declaration that we are working in a flat space. And that's all it is, just like the rule for the movement of a knight piece is 1 lateral square for 2 medial squares.
  11. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Greek Style If I ever somehow happen to discover an alien planet, I hereby vow to name it Fartgiver.

    They would name you dicksucker
  12. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood So why is he still in office then

    The senate is full of Republicans, and they are the ones who had to vote on removing him from office.
  13. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson If alien species #491 drew a perfect circle on their planet of Fartgiver, then the radius of that circle would still fit 3.14 (etc) times around it's circumference…they would also never have heard of the Greek fella you are mentioning…again the rule set exists regardless of humans.

    Nowhere in the universe has totally flat space, therefore no it would not hold true, as having a flat geometry is a necessary assumption for it to hold true.

    Same way that in a curved geometry the internal angles of a triangle don't add up to 180 degrees. In the real world, space is curved.
  14. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Just so you know Gay Style's only tactic to cope with his butthurt is too cheerlead other people getting raped by me.
  15. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson

    He lost ^
  16. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Greek Style Is stl1 not mad about that?

    Idk one got impeached for selling his ass and our country to the Russians, the other got impeached for getting his dick sucked.
  17. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson No it isn't…whether you accept it or not…if a human cut 3.14 pieces of string the same length as the radius of a selected circle…they would fit perfectly around the circumference…regardless of if the human accepted the rule or not…he would be wrong not to accept the rule… the fact would remain those 3.14 pieces of string would fit.

    If a goat had the intellect to cut the string and lay it around the circumference the result would be the same.

    No it wouldn't, as we don't live in a Euclidian geometry. You might approximate it, but it's simply not true.
  18. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    He was already impeached, same as Bill Clinton.
  19. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    It = my cock, in his head
  20. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by -SpectraL No, no, no. We don't just take someone's "good word" for anything, at this point. Show the documentation. Show the study. Show the evidence.

    It won't do you any good, bud.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 163
  6. 164
  7. 165
  8. 166
  9. 167
  10. 168
  11. ...
  12. 383
  13. 384
  14. 385
  15. 386
Jump to Top