User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 139
  6. 140
  7. 141
  8. 142
  9. 143
  10. 144
  11. ...
  12. 383
  13. 384
  14. 385
  15. 386

Posts by ORACLE

  1. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by -SpectraL So, in other words, your technique cherry picks the data, with a very convenient narrow focus.

    No, those would only be other words for what I said if you had exceptionally poor réading comprehension skills.
  2. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by -SpectraL What about the data before the collecting of rigorous data collection?

    I'm talking about rigourously recording present data as it happens. We only started doing that globally in the late 1800s.

    There are very powerful techniques for gathering historical data before that such as drilling ice cores and analysing the air bubbles that get trapped in there year by year.

    But of course this isn't as useful for studying what happened precisely between 1300 and 1200 BC, of course it doesn't have the same accuracy as literally collecting it live on a day by day basis with global collaboration across the board, as is the case now.

    We can do longer term analysis, the "pixels" we can see are just bigger. You can still gain a lot of detailed information with statistical analysis. It's just not as good as literally recording it day by day as it happens.

    And the evidence is pretty clear: the earth does not warm up this quickly naturally and it never has.
  3. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Vaping and smoking weed on my balcony with my gf
  4. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Oh and just in case you have a problem with the source, David L Chandler:

    http://news.mit.edu/staff-directory
  5. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Kev So you concede our puny existence cant control the universe?

    Doubling down on being retarded^



    Here is the long term trend:

    Hey look, an article addressing these exact graphs and their data!

    https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11647-climate-myths-its-been-far-warmer-in-the-past-whats-the-big-deal/

    Extract:

    The important question is what is causing the current, rapid warming? We cannot dismiss it as natural variation just because the planet has been warmer at various times in the past. Many studies suggest it can only be explained by taking into account human activity.

    Nor does the fact that it has been warmer in the past mean that future warming is nothing to worry about. The sea level has been tens of metres higher during past warm periods, enough to submerge most major cities around the world




    yes, any idiot agrees the planet has been warming the past century. whats your point?

    Yes any idiot believes it's not happening especially fast due to human activity.

    The experts on the other hand, do agree that it is the case.

    See the greenland and vostok ice cores, the isotopes are as direct as can be.

    Neither of these have a resolution of 20 years.



    Which is lunacy that is contradicted by the long term record.

    No it isn't, it's pretty basic reasoning and climate science that you're not able to wrap your head around because it is shoved 400m up your ass, drill for shit cores to analyze for long term data.
  6. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Kev Yes it does you fucking idiot. if the middle ages was warmer than today despite no fossil fuels, that directly contradicts your theory. did they burn fossil fuels during the roman warming period too?

    If the Big Bang was warmer without burning fossil fuels, how can fossil fuels make it hotter



    One only needs to add and subtract, since 1880 the temperature rose by 1 degree yet it is still 2 degrees colder than what the temperature was in year 1000.

    Doesn't understand trends ^

    Prove it is anthropogenic. was the previous warming period also anthropogenic?



    still need the proof of the anthropogenic assertion.

    97% of scientists qualified to interpret the data agree on it. I'm not trying to change your mind because you don't know what you don't know.



    the resolution is mean 20 years per point i believe. why do you need it year by year?

    We don't have direct climate data from millions of years ago at a resolution of 20 years.



    no, it doesnt, the previous warming spike was bigger and steeper and so was the fall. the previous one before that was even worse.

    Literally nobody ever disputed that the Earth's climate changes, only asserted that human activity is causing a more rapid change in climate than ever has naturally been the case.
  7. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    "You burnt dinner"

    "Actually no, how could I burn this dinner if it came from a much hotter supernova billions of years ago? Do you think my stove is hotter than a supernova?"
  8. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Kev that is irrelevant, the data we have shows us what the historical temperatures were way before 100 years ago. if we had warming periods that were way warmer than this one in an age before we had industry or fossil fuels, that invalidates the lunatic theory that we are warming the planet today.

    No it doesn't you fucking illiterate god damn moron.

    That is why I keep asking if your brain short-circuited and blew a fuse after seeing the first graph, because you are either completely illiterate or deliberately trying to avoid expert scientific interpretation of the data you are totally unqualified to review.

    The first graph is intended to show GROWTH RATE since 1880 and it just one EXAMPLE of anthropogenic climate change. Which has been pretty alarming considering the earth usually has these magnitudes of temperature shifts on a geologic timescale, not an anthropic one.

    Everything else doesn't hinge on this graph and you're retarded on what it means anyway.

    We only have granular data from since the 1880s because that is when we started collecting granular present data. There are no 2 ways to interpret this data, the rise in temperatures has been rapid due to human activity. We have climate data from millions of years ago but it's not granular down to even close to year by year, but it still shows much slower shifts than in the last 140 years.
  9. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Kev you realize we have rigorous climate data that goes back millions of years?

    We didn't start collecting it until fairly recently, like in the last 100 years. Stop dodging. Did you read anything beyond the graph saying "100 years" or what? How does 100 years invalidate anything?
  10. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Kev "since we started collecting rigorous climate data" what year is this start?

    Somewhere like a hundred ago.

    Stop dodging faggot. Did you read below the very first graph or is this some persistent autistic obsession?
  11. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny your a something that even stateless rohingya are ashamed to be a part of.

    thats why thry ran to burma.

    Ok buddy retard
  12. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Kev It means your link that says the climate has been warming for the past 100 years means jack shit considering the climate has been warming and cooling for billions of years. what is special about the past 100 years?

    It has one chart showing indisputable evidence of climate change since we started collecting rigorous climate data. How does that invalidate anything said below the fucking flavor text?
  13. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Kev I dont understand your confusion. did you read your own link you just gave me?

    Retard what does "the climate wasn't born 100 years ago" fucking mean?
  14. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Technologist Sitting on my deck sewing, with a big fan on me, while my hubby is smoking 2 huge racks of ribs.

    I’m so proud of me. I haven’t sewn in ages and I still got it.

    Gay
  15. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Captain Faggot smells like curry.

    Shut the fuck up faggot before I bust a captain your ass
  16. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by Kev notice they only talk about the past century without taking the billions of years of history into account.

    the climate was not born 100 years ago.

    ???
  17. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by TJ thats horse shit. I think Totsean is from there. Im trying to be Christian here. but I feel punchy a bit

    he lived in philipine islands for a while that totsean guy. maybe he is an Ex Pat

    No, it's a desperate attempt to force an insult that makes no sense. That's the actual answer, as I'm not Bengali.
  18. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
  19. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by TJ you mean Mexican Master Race?? hes a bengladeshi?

    No he is bengali
  20. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by TJ I just am losing the will to continue this shameful virtual brawlfest.

    reality is darker than the most frightening horror story you can imagine. and two thirds of the world are humans with demons who occupy their bodies like a kayak theyre recklessly going over the falls in the river styx. also known as the gateway to Hell.

    You are a rag of filth floating in a clean bucket, putrefying its water with your worthless and essentially negative presence.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 139
  6. 140
  7. 141
  8. 142
  9. 143
  10. 144
  11. ...
  12. 383
  13. 384
  14. 385
  15. 386
Jump to Top