User Controls
Posts by We'reAllBrownNosers
-
2019-04-29 at 7:54 PM UTC in THIS is the reason white people are losing and the non whites are taking overYou're absolutely right Ghost. I've been saying that for years. White people tend to treat their relatives badly. I could save money by staying with family, if they wouldn't constantly mind-fuck me and try to borrow money they don't even need. They play mind games constantly. It's to a point where I think maybe they're mind controlled by reptilian jedis to keep a white beta male down.
But in reality white people just suck. Makes me want to take a couple fully automatic weapons and just start spraying white families with them. Fuckin faggots. But it's mostly the lower class or middle class that do this. Upper class or wealthy whites aren't such pieces of shit, ironically. I have been offered help and even a place to stay by attractive wealthy white women. Had to turn it down because I felt obligated to stay with my sister and put up with her narcissistic mind games bullshit.
I wish there was a commune for people like us, where we could pool our resources, the way beaners do, where they've got like 20 people living in a trailer, each with a job, where none of them has to pay rent so they keep all the money they earn. Except we wouldn't be dumb beaners, and wouldn't be living in a trailer huffing bean farts. -
2019-04-29 at 7:48 PM UTC in Do you steal?I only steal from the government. Not usually anything that's worth a lot though. Not for the money. Just things I need.
-
2019-04-29 at 7:45 PM UTC in Texas Federal Court Becomes the Third to Strike Down Pro-Israel Oath as Unconstitutionallol everyone replying isn't even American
No point reading it if you're not American.
TLDR
But basically, the governor is a faggot, signed a bill into law that forced people to take an oath stating that they wouldn't boycott Israel, and the federal court declared the law is unconstitutional. Pretty simple. Governor needs to be shot in the guts and plowed under for fertilizer -
2019-04-29 at 7:31 PM UTC in Texas Federal Court Becomes the Third to Strike Down Pro-Israel Oath as Unconstitutional
A FEDERAL COURT IN TEXAS issued a ruling on Thursday afternoon preliminarily enjoining enforcement of Texas’ law banning contractors from boycotting Israel. The court ruled that the law plainly violates the free speech guarantee of the First Amendment. Following similar decisions by federal courts in Kansas and Arizona, the ruling becomes the third judicial finding – out of three who have evaluated the constitutionality of such laws – to conclude that they are unconstitutional attacks on the free speech rights of Americans.
The case was brought by Bahia Amawi, a longtime elementary school speech pathologist in Austin, Texas, whose contract renewal was denied due to her refusal to sign an oath certifying that she does not participate in any boycotts of Israel. In December, The Intercept was the first to report on her case and the lawsuit she brought, and also produced a video documenting her story:
Amawi, a U.S. citizen and mother of four U.S.-born children, was required to sign the pro-Israel oath due to a new law enacted with almost no dissent by the Texas State Legislature in May 2017, and signed into law two days later by GOP Gov. Greg Abbott. When signing the bill, Gov. Abbott proclaimed: “Any anti-Israel policy is an anti-Texas policy.”
But this was precisely the mentality, along with the virtually unanimous pro-Israel sentiment in the Texas State Legislature, that the Texas federal judge identified when explaining why the pro-Israel oath so blatantly violates the free speech guarantees of the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment:
In Texas, only five legislators voted against H.B. 89. (Texas Resp. Mots. Prelim. Inj., Dkt. 25, at 4). Texas touts these numbers as the statute’s strength. They are, rather, its weakness. “If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.” W. Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 642 (1943). “[T]he purpose behind the Bill of Rights, and of the First Amendment in particular[,]” is “to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation—and their ideas from suppression—at the hands of an intolerant society.” McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm’n, 514 U.S. 334, 357 (1995).
Thus, “our citizens must tolerate insulting, and even outrageous, speech” in public debate. Boos, 485 U.S. at 322. They must do so “in order to provide ‘adequate breathing space’ to the freedoms protected by the First Amendment.” Id. (citing Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46, 56 (1988)). With H.B. 89, Texas compresses this space. The statute threatens “to suppress unpopular ideas” and “manipulate the public debate through coercion rather than persuasion.” Turner, 512 U.S. at 641. This the First Amendment does not allow.
The ruling, issued by U.S. District Court Judge Robert Pitman, categorically rejected each of Texas’ justifications for the law. Judge Pitman was particularly emphatic that the law was not merely “government speech” in defense of Israel, but rather a classic embodiment of what the First Amendment, at its core, was designed to prevent: punishment imposed on those who disagree with the majority’s political opinions on hotly contested political topics. The attack on free speech, explained the court, was manifest from the text of the law itself:
It is a content- and viewpoint-based restriction on speech. It is a content-based restriction because it singles out speech about Israel, not any other country. And it is a viewpoint-based restriction because it targets only speech “intended to penalize, inflict harm on, or limit commercial relations specifically with Israel, or with a person or entity doing business in Israel or in an Israeli-controlled territory.” Tex. Gov. Case 1:18-cv-01091- . . . [T]he Court finds that H.B. 89’s plain text, the statements surrounding its passage, and Texas’s briefing in this case reveal the statute to be a viewpoint-based restriction intended not to combat discrimination on the basis of national origin, but to silence speech with which Texas disagrees. First, the plain text: H.B. 89 singles out content and viewpoint for restriction. With respect to content, the statute targets only boycotts of Israel; Texas contractors remain free to boycott Palestine or any other country.
Much of the court’s reasoning relied upon the landmark 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision in NAACP v. Clairborne Hardwarde Co., which rejected attempts by the state of Mississippi to hold state NAACP leaders liable for property damage done to stores by the NAACP activists’ boycotts. Their property destruction, claimed Mississippi, was “incited” and “inspired” by the inflammatory rhetoric of NAACP leaders. The Supreme Court unanimously rejected those attempts on the ground that, as the Texas court put it, “the desire to not purchase certain products is distinctly protected in the context of a political boycott,” and nobody can be punished for the “consequences” of protected First Amendment activities, including theories that their speech “inspired” or “incited’ others to take action.
Just as those NAACP leaders in Mississippi could not be punished by the state for the consequences of their political speech advocating boycotts (because boycotts are core protected First Amendment activity), advocates of an Israel boycott may not be constitutionally limited, constrained, or punished in any way by the state as a result of their boycott activities. In sum, said the court, “plaintiffs’ BDS boycotts are speech protected by the First Amendment.”
What makes this ruling particularly important, aside from the fact that it comes from one of the largest states in the country, is that it completely rejected the most common (and most toxic) justification for these laws: that it is not designed to suppress speech or activism against Israel but rather to combat discrimination (namely, anti-Semitism or discrimination against Israelis).
The court treated this cynical argument with barely disguised disdain: “The statute’s plain text makes its purpose obvious: to prevent expressive conduct critical of the nation of Israel, not discriminatory conduct on the basis of Israeli national origin. Texas points to no authority indicating that such a purpose is a legitimate or compelling aim of government justifying the restriction of First Amendment freedoms.”
Such laws are indisputably designed to outlaw and punish political activism that lies at the heart of the First Amendment’s free speech guarantee. As the court adeptly described the targeted political activism: “The BDS movement—referring to boycotts, divestment, and sanctions—arose in response to Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory and its treatment of Palestinian citizens and refugees.” It is “[m]odeled after the South African anti-apartheid movement” and “seeks to pressure the Israeli government to end its occupation of the West Bank, Gaza, and Golan Heights, end discrimination against Arab/Palestinian citizens of Israel, permit Palestinian refugees to return to their homes, and otherwise comply with international law.”
As The Intercept has often documented, the attempt to criminalize or otherwise outlaw activism against the Israeli government is easily one of the greatest threats to free speech both in the U.S. and the West generally, if not the single greatest threat. The anti-BDS laws in particular have been rapidly proliferating in the U.S., directly threatening core free speech rights of American citizens in the name of protecting a foreign country.
As this map, previously published by The Intercept and prepared by Palestine Legal, illustrates, and as the court correctly observed, “twenty-five states have enacted legislation or issued executive orders restricting boycotts of Israel,” and “in every state to consider such legislation, the proposed measures have passed by considerable margins.”
Cool -
2019-04-29 at 7:07 PM UTC in Russian army has "super soldiers"
Originally posted by -SpectraL Are you O_RLY, We'reAllBrownNosers?
Nope, I introduced him to the community though. We used to both fuck around on teenchat.com
Hackers liked it because the owner didn't care if you fucked with the site, as long as you didn't actually fuck it up. There was this one Muslim hacker, who was actually pretty damn good. O RLY would probably know who I'm talking about.
Pretty sure he is several years younger than me though. Why would you think I might be O RLY?
EDIT: I sent a lot of people from teenchat and optichat to totse and zoklet lolz -
2019-04-29 at 6:56 PM UTC in ATTN : TechnologistGingers tend to fuck anything that moves. Prone to mudsharking.
-
2019-04-29 at 6:51 PM UTC in Who wants to meet up and beat up lesbians
-
2019-04-29 at 6:08 PM UTC in Who wants to meet up and beat up lesbians
-
2019-04-29 at 6:07 PM UTC in Nigger rapes 5 year old girl so bad she requires surgery
Steven Sarandon Barnes, 28, was arrested over the weekend on charges including first-degree rape and chemical endangerment of a child
Assault left the 5-year-old girl so badly injured she required surgery and is now in a stable condition in hospital
Local police chief described the incident as one of the worst cases he's encountered over the past 31 years working in law enforcement
Barnes, who appears to have a young son, is being held on $106,000 bail
An Alabama man is accused of brutally raping a five-year-old girl, who was hospitalized and underwent surgery following the attack.
Steven Sarandon Barnes, 28, was arrested over the weekend on charges including first-degree rape and chemical endangerment of a child.
Millbrook Police Chief P.K. Johnson says authorities responded on Thursday to a Prattville hospital for a report of a sexually assaulted child.
He says she underwent surgery, and he believed the girl was in stable condition as of Saturday.
'I will say that this is one of the worst cases that I've seen in my 31 years in law enforcement,' Johnson said.
'Anybody who would do this to a child is a complete and total danger to the society and does not need to be roaming about the community where children are at large,' Houston told the Montgomery Advertiser.
Police began investigating the assault after the girl was taken to Prattville Baptist Hospital on Thursday.
Due to the seriousness of her injuries, the victim had to be transferred to the Children's Hospital in Birmingham, where she underwent surgery.
Authorities identified Barnes as the suspect and later arrested him in the 400 block of Deatsville Highway, in neighborhood where the attack happened.
Barnes is being held on $106,000 bail. District Attorney Houston said he is looking to increase the charges and bond amount.
Barnes has a prior criminal record that includes a marijuana possession charge.
Social media posts suggest that he has a young son of his own.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6971261/One-worst-cases-Alabama-man-accused-girls-rape.html
I wonder if the mother of the 5 year old girl was a mudshark. Either way, the mother should probably be shot in the guts and plowed under for fertilizer, for letting this happen.
And this nigger should be raped by a horse so his asshole is falling apart by the time it's done with him and he's bleeding internally, then slowly lowered into a pool of sulfuric acid. -
2019-04-29 at 5:40 PM UTC in How to make 5 kilos of morphine from a 1 meter patch of poppiesCool thread, didn't know this. I know a drug nerd that would be interested in this probably.
EDIT: misleading title, although potentially a great way for terrorists to kill shitloads of people -
2019-04-29 at 5:37 PM UTC in Manual Labor
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson The good thing about manual labor is you don't need to go to the gym…think of it as paid exercise…that's what I always tell my underlings.
Women also like a handy man. I know a guy who is ex military, but after he got out of the military, owned several businesses, made shitloads of money, and still did manual labor just for the practice and exercise. He'd have an entire crew of people working for him, sometimes they wouldn't even know he was their boss, and he'd get in and work with them, doing their job better than they could. He's never had any trouble attracting women because he can fix pretty much anything. Taught me how to solder and sweat copper and a bunch of other stuff. That's why I'd work for free sometimes, just to learn a trade. Even if the economy collapses and the money is worthless, the person that knows several trades is going to be better off than the person working in an office, because they can actually fix stuff, do things that are actually useful. -
2019-04-29 at 5:31 PM UTC in Manual LaborI don't mind manual labor, but it's not something I'd rely on. I have a brother whose wife makes pretty good money, so he actually doesn't have to work at all. But, he's nearly 50 and still does manual labor simply cause he enjoys it and doesn't have to ask his wife for money for weed and beer. He was in prison for murder and in and out of jail ever since, too, so I guess actual work seems like a great deal compared to that sort of thing.
-
2019-04-29 at 5:24 PM UTC in I've got the loudest stereo on the block =)What neighborhood do you live in Bill Krozby
-
2019-04-29 at 5:21 PM UTC in Anyone ever get spanked as a kid
Originally posted by Bill Krozby peedy is cool most of the time, but he does have a tendency to deflect hardcore. He brought up in a thread a couple days ago about how I was smoking a cigarette on tc, a thread had nothing to do with me that I didn't even post in…
Either he's a good troll or he's just like that I can't tell.
Just ask him about dr mike and he will probably call you a moron because he can't back up anything about his personal experiences with doctor mike.
like I listen to alex jones, dr mike, and douglas dietrich and posted on totse but I don't claim to know any of these gonts personally.
I mentioned once how I met alex jones briefly and said nothing more than that because thats all it was and he started going on a rant how alex jones probably hates me and was just being polite.. its lol whut? maybe.. i don't the guy… just kinda strange to throw things like that out.
That's your problem, listening to crackheads and taking them seriously. -
2019-04-29 at 5:19 PM UTC in Here are my top picks for the most degenerate users of NIS
-
2019-04-29 at 5:17 PM UTC in Spic mayor arrested for voter fraud in TXMad spics are mad they're being deported and arrested for being worthless turds. The best they can come up with is "durr dis guy has psychosis"
Maybe you should tell your relatives to say that about the people deporting them. It might stop them being deported LMAO -
2019-04-29 at 5:15 PM UTC in Russian army has "super soldiers"
-
2019-04-29 at 5:08 PM UTC in tc is destroyed
Originally posted by mashlehash Do you remember Logic, JPW, or the rest of those niggers in irc?
I wish IRC was still around.
There's nothing stopping someone from making their own channel. I liked zok's channel, but people like Ond and Aiden made it somewhat shitty at times.
IRC is still around, it's just not possible for anyone to join #totse on slashnet. -
2019-04-29 at 5:04 PM UTC in lol panthrax got divorced over a slampigHmm, I remember when he would be in #totse listening to "Angry Aryans"
If you end up going to prison and joining an Aryan gang, you're probably going to end up becoming a piece of shit just to survive. But a lot of people are already pieces of shit before going into prison. Best of luck to the guy though. -
2019-04-28 at 10:42 PM UTC in Spic mayor arrested for voter fraud in TXhttps://bigleaguepolitics.com/texas-mayor-arrested-for-voter-fraud/
The mayor of Edinburg, Texas, and his wife were arrested and charged with voter fraud Thursday, according to Attorney General Ken Paxton.
“City of Edinburg Mayor Richard Molina and his wife, Dalia, are charged with illegal voting, a second-degree felony punishable by two to 20 years in jail and an up to $10,000 fine, related to his 2017 mayoral election,” according to The Houston Chronicle. “Molina unseated the incumbent Mayor Richard Garcia after winning by more than 1,200 votes in that election.”
The couple reportedly asked voters to change their addresses to locations where they do not live – including to an apartment complex that Molina owns – so they could vote for him in November of 2017.
“Voter fraud is an affront to democracy and places the decision-making authority of the Texas electorate in the hands of those who have no right to make those choices,” said Paxton. “My office will always do everything it can to protect the integrity of Texas elections and the rights of every legal voter to cast a ballot and have it counted accurately.”
Trending: TEARS: Massachusetts Judge Cries After Indictment for Helping Illegal Alien Evade ICE
The report said that the city spokeswoman is set to address the charges next week.
Early this year, the Texas Secretary of State uncovered massive voter fraud within the state, which the political left is desperately trying to turn blue.
Big League Politics reported:
Texas Secretary of State David Whitley released a statement documenting the conclusions of his year-long investigation into voter fraud within the state.
Whitley has identified over 95,000 non-citizens registered as eligible voters throughout the state of Texas. Out of that massive pool of illegal registered voters, the Secretary of State’s office discovered that 58,000 registered non-citizen voters have voted in one or more elections.
This revelation of fundamentally undemocratic and illegitimate voting practices enabled by lax voter registration and ID laws is sure to cast doubt upon the results of several close elections in the state this past election cycle. For example, Republican Congressman John Culberson, who had represented the state’s 7th congressional district west of Houston since 2001, lost his bid for re-election to Democrat Lizzie Pannill Fletcher by around 12,000 votes. It’s possible that ballots cast by ineligible non-citizen voters in the election could have cost him victory.
Voter fraud is a felony in Texas, and Whitley’s office is providing information on his investigation to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. Since 2005, 130 cases of voter fraud have been prosecuted in Texas– perhaps with greater frequency than in other states plagued with election integrity breaches, but still a mere drop in the ocean when compared to the figures released in Whitley’s investigation.
Too bad there's any hispanics at all in the US. They contribute absolutely nothing of value and make the place a worse shit-hole than it already was.