User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 68
  6. 69
  7. 70
  8. 71
  9. 72
  10. 73
  11. ...
  12. 730
  13. 731
  14. 732
  15. 733

Posts by stl1

  1. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Scratching my scrotum.
  2. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood a hooker



    Those are for renting only.
  3. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Old news.






































    lol
  4. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by WellHung ur description isnt wut i put in my mouth.




    God only knows what you've put in your mouth!
  5. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    You were also told Rump would be reinstated a dozen times by now.

    Just maybe...you should check your sources?
  6. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    ORANGE MAN BAD.
  7. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    High praise from such a low-life.
  8. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Court Rejects Trump’s Efforts to Keep Records from 1/6 Panel
    In a 68-page ruling, the three-judge panel tossed aside Trump’s various arguments for blocking through executive privilege records that the committee regards as vital to its investigation into the run-up to the deadly riot aimed at overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election.
    Associated Press

    WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal appeals court ruled Thursday against an effort by former President Donald Trump to shield documents from the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol.

    In a 68-page ruling, the three-judge panel tossed aside Trump’s various arguments for blocking through executive privilege records that the committee regards as vital to its investigation into the run-up to the deadly riot aimed at overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election.

    Judge Patricia Millett, writing for the court, said Congress had “uniquely vital interests” in studying the events of Jan. 6 and said President Joe Biden had made a “carefully reasoned” determination that the documents were in the public interest and that executive privilege should therefore not be invoked. Trump also failed to show any harm that would occur from the release of the sought-after records, Millett wrote.

    “On the record before us, former President Trump has provided no basis for this court to override President Biden’s judgment and the agreement and accommodations worked out between the Political Branches over these documents,” the opinion states.

    It adds, “Both Branches agree that there is a unique legislative need for these documents and that they are directly relevant to the Committee’s inquiry into an attack on the Legislative Branch and its constitutional role in the peaceful transfer of power.

    The appeals court ruled that the injunction that has prevented the National Archives from turning over the documents will expire in two weeks, or when the Supreme Court rules on an expected appeal from Trump, whichever is later. Lawyers for Trump can also ask the entire appeals court to review the case. Seven of the 11 appellate judges on the court were appointed by Democratic presidents, four by Republican presidents.

    Trump spokeswoman Liz Harrington said after the ruling: “Regardless of today’s decision by the the appeals court, this case was always destined for the Supreme Court. President Trump’s duty to defend the Constitution and the Office of the Presidency continues, and he will keep fighting for every American and every future Administration.”

    The court wrote: “The privilege being asserted is not a personal privilege belonging to former President Trump; he stewards it for the benefit of the Republic. The interests the privilege protects are those of the Presidency itself, not former President Trump individually. And the President has determined that immediate disclosure will promote, not injure, the national interest, and that delay here is itself injurious.”

    The court also praised Biden’s “calibrated judgement” in working with Congress and the Archives to weigh privilege concerns, saying it “bears no resemblance to the ‘broad and limitless waiver’ of executive privilege former President Trump decries.”

    Biden had the committee defer its requests for some of the early documents that might have posed privilege claims, and officials expect more documents in subsequent tranches will be subject to the same outcome.

    The House committee did not immediately respond to a request for comment. But House Speaker Nancy Pelosi released a statement saying: “Today, the Courts have once again rejected the former President’s campaign to obstruct Congress’s investigation into the January 6th insurrection. No one can be allowed to stand in the way of the truth — particularly not the previous President, who incited the insurrection.”

    White House spokesman Mike Gwin said, “As President Biden determined, the constitutional protections of executive privilege should not be used to shield information that reflects a clear and apparent effort to subvert the Constitution itself.”

    Trump sued the House Jan. 6 committee and the National Archives to stop the White House from allowing the release of documents related to the insurrection. Biden had waived Trump’s executive privilege claims as the current officeholder.

    At issue, the court said, is not that Trump “has no say in the matter” but his failure to show that withholding the documents should supersede Biden’s “considered and weighty judgment” that Congress is entitled to them.

    The National Archives has said that the records Trump wants to block include presidential diaries, visitor logs, speech drafts, handwritten notes “concerning the events of January 6” from the files of former chief of staff Mark Meadows, and “a draft Executive Order on the topic of election integrity.”

    Arguing for the committee, U.S. House lawyer Douglas Letter argued that the determination of a current president should outweigh predecessors in almost all circumstances and noted that both Biden and Congress were in agreement that the Jan. 6 records should be turned over.

    All three of the appeals court judges who heard the arguments were nominated by Democrats. Millett and Judge Robert Wilkins were nominated by former President Barack Obama. Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson is a Biden appointee seen as a contender for a Supreme Court seat should one open during the current administration.

    Republican presidents nominated six of the nine Supreme Court justices, including three chosen by Trump.
  9. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    The Guardian
    Capitol attack panel obtains PowerPoint that set out plan for Trump to stage coup
    Hugo Lowell in Washington


    Former Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows turned over to the House select committee investigating the 6 January Capitol attack a PowerPoint recommending Donald Trump to declare a national security emergency in order to return himself to the presidency.

    The fact that Meadows was in possession of a PowerPoint the day before the Capitol attack that detailed ways to stage a coup suggests he was at least aware of efforts by Trump and his allies to stop Joe Biden’s certification from taking place on 6 January.

    The PowerPoint, titled “Election Fraud, Foreign Interference & Options for 6 Jan”, made several recommendations for Trump to pursue in order to retain the presidency for a second term on the basis of lies and debunked conspiracies about widespread election fraud.

    Meadows turned over a version of the PowerPoint presentation that he received in an email and spanned 38 pages, according to a source familiar with the matter.

    The Guardian reviewed a second, 36-page version of the PowerPoint marked for dissemination with 5 January metadata, which had some differences with what the select committee received. But the title of the PowerPoint and its recommendations remained the same, the source said.

    Senators and members of Congress should first be briefed about foreign interference, the PowerPoint said, at which point Trump could declare a national emergency, declare all electronic voting invalid, and ask Congress to agree on a constitutionally acceptable remedy.

    The PowerPoint also outlined three options for then vice-president Mike Pence to abuse his largely ceremonial role at the joint session of Congress on 6 January, when Biden was to be certified president, and unilaterally return Trump to the White House.

    Pence could pursue one of three options, the PowerPoint said: seat Trump slates of electors over the objections of Democrats in key states, reject the Biden slates of electors, or delay the certification to allow for a “vetting” and counting of only “legal paper ballots”.

    The final option for Pence is similar to an option that was simultaneously being advanced on 4 and 5 January by Trump lieutenants – led by lawyers Rudy Giuliani and John Eastman, as well as Trump strategist Steve Bannon – working from the Willard hotel in Washington DC.

    The Guardian revealed last week that sometime between the late evening of 5 January and the early hours of 6 January, after Pence declined to go ahead with such plans, Trump then pressed his lieutenants about how to stop Biden’s certification from taking place entirely.

    The recommendations in the PowerPoint for both Trump and Pence were based on wild and unsubstantiated claims of election fraud, including that “the Chinese systematically gained control over our election system” in eight key battleground states.

    The then acting attorney general, Jeff Rosen, and his predecessor, Bill Barr, who had both been appointed by Trump, by 5 January had already determined that there was no evidence of voter fraud sufficient to change the outcome of the 2020 election.

    House investigators said that they became aware of the PowerPoint after it surfaced in more than 6,000 documents Meadows turned over to the select committee. The PowerPoint was to be presented “on the Hill”, a reference to Congress, the panel said.

    The powerpoint was presented on 4 January to a number of Republican senators and members of Congress, the source said. Trump’s lawyers working at the Willard hotel were not shown the presentation, according to a source familiar with the matter.

    But the select committee said they did find in the materials turned over by Meadows, his text messages with a member of Congress, who told Meadows about a “highly controversial” plan to send slates of electors for Trump to the joint session of Congress.

    Meadows replied: “I love it.”

    Trump’s former White House chief of staff had turned over the materials to the select committee until the cooperation deal broke down on Tuesday, when Meadows’ attorney, Terwilliger, abruptly told House investigators that Meadows would no longer help the investigation.

    The select committee announced on Wednesday that in response, it would refer Meadows for criminal prosecution for defying a subpoena. The chairman of the select committee, Bennie Thompson, said the vote to hold Meadows in contempt of Congress would come next week.

    “The select committee will meet next week to advance a report recommending that the House cite Mr Meadows for contempt of Congress and refer him to the Department of Justice for prosecution,” Thompson said in a statement.
  10. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    No.

    That is secret code for "I'm sticking my head in the sand now."
  11. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    My post didn't get your creative juices flowing?

    At least I hope those are creative juices!
  12. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    I'm optimistically awaiting the MAGAticon variant that only kills unvaccinated Republicans.
  13. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    "NIS poster craving attention"
  14. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    ...laughing her ass off at the pervert who wants her to tongue punch his asshole.
  15. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    LOL

    Whodda thunk, chump?
  16. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by Grylls Next year I’m going to start making my own cards too

    3D popup ones



    I've made my own cards for years. I have a roll of very heavy paper that I got at a yard sale probably 35 or so years ago that I use with pictures I cut from my Missouri Conservationist magazine featuring different animals. I mostly make them for the grandkids these days.

    I remember one of the first ones I ever made was for my older sister when she turned 60. I had cut out a picture of a snake eating a frog with only the legs still sticking out of his mouth. I glued it to the front and, when opened read "Turning 60? Ain't that a bite in the ass!"

    She still reminds me of it.
  17. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Only one blade?
  18. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Wariot will probably end up with ringing in his ears by this gal's pimp after he breaks into the room and gives him a beat down before robbing him and throwing his clothes out the window before he ties him naked to the bed for the maid to find later.
  19. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Notice how all the major players are being taken out one by one.



    No.

    Maybe you can quote a source for us.

    hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
  20. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by RIPtotse True….I'm hoping next semester..spring..they won't push it as hard and I won't be labeled non compliant and have to get tested every week




    Exactly how many poison needles have you jabbed into your body while spending $300,000/year on heroin?

    Gimme a break.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 68
  6. 69
  7. 70
  8. 71
  9. 72
  10. 73
  11. ...
  12. 730
  13. 731
  14. 732
  15. 733
Jump to Top