User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 61
  6. 62
  7. 63
  8. 64
  9. 65
  10. 66
  11. ...
  12. 730
  13. 731
  14. 732
  15. 733

Posts by stl1

  1. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    ?
  2. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Or crock potting was to the 70s
  3. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Jiggly will be swallowing the rainbow pill...

    all the way to the hilt!
  4. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Yeah, you wouldn't want to visit family and get a cold. That would be like a death sentence, for certain.



    In your case, I encourage you to crawl out of your cave.
  5. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ "How is the vaccine and booster rollout going?

    So far, more than 51 million people have had a first vaccine dose - some 89% of over-12s. Nearly 47 million - 81.5% of over-12s - have had both doses."

    source: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55274833

    Still want to play, dummy?



    First off, my statement claimed the "general population" whereby yours excludes those under 12 years of age. Apples and oranges, dummy.

    Secondly, the article you quoted is from the BBB and is titled "Covid vaccine: How many people are vaccinated in the UK?"

    We live in the USA, you disingenuous POS.
  6. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Try posting one for a change, you loonytoon.
  7. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    A gag over your mouth would put out that fire.
  8. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    None of your bullshit is ever backed up by anything.

    I always show my source. You never can because you just pull shit out of your ass.
  9. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ The ratbags were just caught cold-cock inflating the numbers of jabs administered. They thought if they fraudulently and purposely exaggerated the numbers, that would finally bring the smart people in to get injected with their toxic poison. Ends up only about 65% of people are jabbed (if that), not the 85%-90% they've been bugling about on their fake news networks for the past year. They're calling it a "mistake". Yeah, the mistake was not bashing them over their heads like baby seals two years ago.



    I have NEVER seen numbers claiming 85-90% vaccination rates for the general population and claim more of your made-up bullshit. It doesn't even make sense to claim a larger number if you are wanting to get the unvaccinated vaccinated.

    Once again, I dare you to show proof of your ridiculous statement and, as usual, don't expect to see said proof insofar as you just made it up and pulled it out of your ass, Speculum.

    Put up or shut up, you lying windbag blowhard.
  10. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    You're going to announce your pregnancy?
  11. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    The simple solution is to grow up, be a man, get your jabs and then be welcomed anywhere.
  12. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Did you find any nekkid pics of Grandma?
  13. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    I just love that guy who cuts and pastes all of those informative articles about Covid and MAGAts.

    What is his name again?

    He's really good.
  14. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Hell no.

    Nobody even likes you, much less loves you!
  15. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Then why does the right keep getting banned, deleted, censured, doxxed and harassed when they point of the left's hypocrisy, while the left doesn't have to worry about any of that?



    Because the left believes in the truth while the right believes in "alternative facts" otherwise known as BULLSHIT.
  16. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by aldra ORANGE MAN BAD!



    Ya got that right!
  17. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    "only the Pfizer and Moderna shots, when reinforced by a booster, appear to have success at stopping (Omicron) infections"

    "The Pfizer and Moderna shots use the new mRNA technology, which has consistently offered the best protection against infection with every variant. All of the other vaccines are based on older methods of triggering an immune response."



    The New York Times
    Most of the World’s Vaccines Likely Won’t Prevent Infection From Omicron
    Stephanie Nolen


    Agrowing body of preliminary research suggests the Covid vaccines used in most of the world offer almost no defense against becoming infected by the highly contagious Omicron variant.

    Receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine in Moju, Para State, Brazil, in April. AstraZeneca’s vaccine, like many other viral vector vaccines, are showing early indications that they do not prevent infection with the Omicron variant.

    All vaccines still seem to provide a significant degree of protection against serious illness from Omicron, which is the most crucial goal. But only the Pfizer and Moderna shots, when reinforced by a booster, appear to have success at stopping infections, and these vaccines are unavailable in most of the world.

    The other shots — including those from AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson and vaccines manufactured in China and Russia — do little to nothing to stop the spread of Omicron, early research shows. And because most countries have built their inoculation programs around these vaccines, the gap could have a profound impact on the course of the pandemic.

    A global surge of infections in a world where billions of people remain unvaccinated not only threatens the health of vulnerable individuals but also increases the opportunity for the emergence of yet more variants. The disparity in the ability of countries to weather the pandemic will almost certainly deepen. And the news about limited vaccine efficacy against Omicron infection could depress demand for vaccination throughout the developing world, where many people are already hesitant or preoccupied with other health problems.

    Most evidence so far is based on laboratory experiments, which do not capture the full range of the body’s immune response, and not from tracking the effect on real-world populations. The results are striking, however.

    The Pfizer and Moderna shots use the new mRNA technology, which has consistently offered the best protection against infection with every variant. All of the other vaccines are based on older methods of triggering an immune response.

    The Chinese vaccines Sinopharm and Sinovac — which make up almost half of all shots delivered globally — offer almost zero protection from Omicron infection. The great majority of people in China have received these shots, which are also widely used in low-and middle-income countries such as Mexico and Brazil.

    A preliminary effectiveness study in Britain found that the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine showed no ability to stop Omicron infection six months after vaccination. Ninety percent of vaccinated people in India received this shot, under the brand name Covishield; it has also been widely used across much of sub-Saharan Africa, where Covax, the global Covid vaccine program, has distributed 67 million doses of it to 44 countries.

    Experts fear news of limited vaccine efficacy against Omicron will depress demand for vaccination in places where people are already hesitant.

    Researchers predict that Russia’s Sputnik vaccine, which is also being used in Africa and Latin America, will show similarly dismal rates of protection against Omicron.

    Demand for the Johnson & Johnson vaccine had been surging in Africa, because its single-shot delivery regimen makes it easy to deliver in low-resource settings. But it too has shown a negligible ability to block Omicron infection.

    Antibodies are the first line of defense induced by vaccines. But the shots also stimulate the growth of T cells, and preliminary studies suggest that these T cells still recognize the Omicron variant, which is important in preventing severe disease.

    “What you lose first is protection against asymptomatic mild infection, what you retain much better is protection against severe disease and death,” said John Moore, a virologist at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York. He called it “a silver lining” that Omicron so far appears less lethal than the Delta variant.

    But this protection will not be enough to prevent Omicron from causing global disruption, said J. Stephen Morrison, director of the Global Health Policy Center at the Center for International and Strategic Studies.

    “The sheer scale of infection will overwhelm health systems, simply because the denominator will be potentially so big,” he said. “If you have a burst of infection worldwide, a shock, what does the world look like on other side of it? Is it, ‘The war is over,’ or, ‘The war has just entered another phase’? We haven’t begun thinking about any of that.”

    Demand for J.&J.’s single-shot regimen had been surging in Africa, as it is easy to deliver in low-resource settings.

    People with breakthrough cases may experience only asymptomatic infection or mild illness, but they can pass the virus to unvaccinated people, who could fall more severely ill, and become a source of new variants.

    Dr. Seth Berkley, the chief executive of Gavi, the global vaccine alliance, said that more data was needed before drawing conclusions about vaccines’ effectiveness against Omicron — and that accelerated vaccination should continue to be the focus of pandemic response.

    Preliminary data from South Africa suggest that with Omicron, there is a much higher chance of people who already had Covid getting reinfected than there was with the original virus and previous variants. But some public health experts say they believe that countries that have already been through brutal waves of Covid, such as Brazil and India, may have a buffer against Omicron, and vaccination after infection produces high antibody levels.

    “The combination of vaccination and exposure to the virus seems to be stronger than only having the vaccine,” said Ramanan Laxminarayan, an epidemiologist in New Delhi. India, he noted, has an adult vaccination rate of only about 40 percent but 90 percent exposure to the virus in some areas.

    “Without a doubt Omicron is going to flood through India,” he said. “But hopefully India is protected to some extent because of vaccination and exposure.”

    China does not have this layer of protection to back up its weak vaccines. Because of China’s aggressive efforts to stop spread of the virus within its borders, relatively few people have previous exposure. Only an estimated 7 percent of people in Wuhan, where the pandemic began, were infected.

    Much of Latin America has relied on the Chinese and Russian vaccines, and on AstraZeneca. Mario Rosemblatt, a professor of immunology at the University of Chile, said that more than 90 percent of Chileans had had two doses of one vaccine, but the great majority of these were Coronavac, the Sinovac shot. High vaccination coverage combined with early reports that Omicron does not cause serious illness is leading to a false sense of security in the country, he said.

    “We have to get people to understand that it doesn’t work like that: If you get high transmissibility you’re going to have the health system saturated because the number of people getting ill will be higher,” he said.

    Brazil has recommended that all vaccinated people get a third dose, and it started using Pfizer’s vaccine for all boosters, but only 40 percent of the vaccinated have turned up to get the extra shot. Dr. Amilcar Tanuri, a virologist at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, said with cautious optimism that the high levels of previous Covid exposure might blunt Omicron’s impact but noted that the most vulnerable Brazilians, vaccinated first, got Coronavac, and tens of millions more were given AstraZeneca.

    Mr. Morrison called Omicron’s ability to evade the protection of vaccination “a massive setback” for low- and middle-income countries, where, far from any discussion of boosters, the focus is still on delivering first shots.

    “The world gets cleaved into two parts, right?” he said. “It’s those that have a quick path toward boosters versus those who have had very limited progress and suddenly they’re subject to this new lashing.”

    Just 13 percent of people in Africa have received at least one dose of a Covid vaccine.

    Dr. Laxminarayan said the Indian government, to which he is an occasional adviser, was considering booster shots, but the Delta variant still poses a significant threat in India, and two vaccine doses offers protection against Delta. That presents the government with a difficult choice between focusing on getting people who remain unvaccinated, or only partly vaccinated, to two doses, or trying to gets boosters to older people and those with high-risk medical conditions as protection against Omicron.

    The news that the non-mRNA vaccines offer little protection against infection from Omicron may further erode demand for shots in countries already struggling to build demand, Mr. Morrison said.

    “This challenges the whole value of vaccines,” he said. “If you’re so far behind and then you suffer this, it’s going to feed anti-vaccine sentiment and weaken confidence.”

    Tolbert Nyenswah, a senior researcher with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said the emerging threat to countries in the global south that have relied on non-mRNA vaccines was an indictment of wealthy countries’ failure to share that technology or help build production points in low- and middle-income countries.

    As a consequence, dangerous variants will continue to emerge from areas with low vaccination coverage and will prolong the pandemic, predicted Dr. Nyenswah, who was deputy minister of health in Liberia through that country’s worst Ebola outbreak.

    Dr. Berkley at Gavi said it would be a serious mistake for countries to ease up on their vaccination push or to assume that only mRNA vaccines are worth distributing.

    “We may be seeing a situation where countries say, ‘If developed countries don’t want these vaccines, then we don’t want these vaccines,’” he said. “That, of course, would be the wrong interpretation, if it turns out that these vaccines prevent against severe disease and death.”
  18. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Maximizing

    All

    Grifting

    Availability



    Business Insider
    Trump's DC hotel was the 'epicenter' of corruption where anyone looking to 'curry favor' could just walk in and 'flash cash,' says watchdog group
    jzitser@businessinsider.com (Joshua Zitser)


    Former President Trump's DC hotel was an "epicenter" of corruption, the head of a watchdog group said in an NBC News op-ed.

    Anyone looking to "curry favor" could walk into the hotel and "flash cash," he wrote.

    These comments follow a damning report on the GSA's oversight of Trump's business dealings.

    Former President Donald Trump's hotel in Washington, DC, was an "epicenter" of corruption, according to the head of an ethics watchdog group.

    "Anyone looking to curry favor with his administration could simply walk over to his namesake hotel a couple of blocks from the White House and flash cash," said Noah Bookbinder, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, in an article published by NBC News.

    Bookbinder's assessment follows a damning House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure report, released on Wednesday.

    It found that the agency overseeing the Trump Organization's lease "washed its hands of any responsibility" in investigating ethical concerns and if the emoluments clauses of the Constitution were being followed, NBC News reported.

    The emoluments clauses prohibit a sitting president from taking payments or benefits from foreign and domestic governments to safeguard against undue influence.

    The report found that the General Services Administration (GSA) failed to track payments from foreign governments to the hotel, per NBC News.

    Representatives of at least 22 foreign governments spent money at Trump properties, including the hotel in DC, during the early years of his presidency, the media outlet said. And there were "zero checks and balances" into whether the hotel's calculations of these payments were fair and accurate, the committee said, per NBC News.

    The report also found that the GSA did not seek to identify the origins of more than $75 million in loans made by Trump and his family to the hotel, and "whether the ultimate source of the financing posed any constitutional concerns," the report said.

    It noted that Trump's refusal to divest his financial interest in the hotel was "problematic" and created "multiple" conflicts of interest during his presidency, per NBC News. The report found that political appointees at the GSA were making real estate decisions that "impacted the president's personal properties," NBC News reported.

    Bookbinder, in his op-ed, explained why he thinks this matters. "On issues from taxes to environmental regulation to foreign policy, we never knew whether Trump's administration was making decisions in the interest of the American people or in the interest of his bottom line," he wrote.
  19. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    The women you date don't know how to tell time?
  20. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    No.

    You're the tiny dicked guy.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 61
  6. 62
  7. 63
  8. 64
  9. 65
  10. 66
  11. ...
  12. 730
  13. 731
  14. 732
  15. 733
Jump to Top