User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 29
  6. 30
  7. 31
  8. 32
  9. 33
  10. 34
  11. ...
  12. 730
  13. 731
  14. 732
  15. 733

Posts by stl1

  1. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=ffm+gilf+anal+fisting&&view=detail&mid=A1B0C27D412DF2858298A1B0C27D412DF2858298&&FORM=VRDGAR&ru=%2Fvideos%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dffm%2520gilf%2520anal%2520fisting%26qs%3Dn%26form%3DQBVR%26%3D%2525eManage%2520Your%2520Search%2520History%2525E%26sp%3D-1%26pq%3Dffm%2520gilf%2520anal%2520fisting%26sc%3D0-21%26sk%3D%26cvid%3DD915C4ABA38F4837929CEE19C43F0A7B
  2. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    So, no denial, faggot?
  3. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    FUCK YOU.
  4. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    With a name like Man Most Queer, we know how any baby he fathered (presuming he is even capable of fathering a child) would turn out.
  5. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    OK, Man Most Queer.
  6. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by mmQ Trump and Biden are the same person if you support either one you support the other one just as much. I am right about that and if you disagree that makes you wrong about that. This cannot be argued because it's a fact.


    Thanks.




    Your idiocy truly amazes me.

    What a moron.
  7. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    You are so full of shit.

    They are all related to " Some UFO reports represent visitations by Non-Human Intelligences of Extraterrestrial Origin".
  8. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    What exactly are the four topics and how are each not related to this topic, Limey?
  9. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Given the vast differences (light years) in space between objects and the fact that we have never gotten any radio signals from another planet and the fact that there has never been conclusive proof or evidence found of alien life, I tend to think that we have never been visited by aliens from another world.

    That said, I find it almost impossible that there is not life, of one sort or the other, out there. Intelligent life occurring on the same timeline as ours could be highly unlikely. Just look at how many millions of years that dinosaurs ruled the Earth. They still would be ruling today and man would have probably never evolved to rule the planet had we not been hit by the asteroid that killed the dinosaur and changed Earth's direction.

    I can hardly wait for that fancy new James Webb telescope to begin sending back pictures!
  10. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    tl/dw
  11. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker You make the rest of us patriots look like loons.




    He doesn't need to.

    You do an excellent job of making yourself look like a loon, whackadoodle.
  12. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Focus on information




    Focus on my ass, you buttfucking loser.
  13. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    What was her username on here?
  14. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by RIPtotse I'm pretty sure your not the ONLY guy lol.

    I've done it a few times but it was never my favorite thing to do.

    It would only happen to me if say someone I knew had a hot as fuxk girl but the dude wasn't, but she just moved here or needed his money and a roof over her head and then the guy invites me over to sell him drugs or he's having a party or something and the girl, for some reason, gets attracted to me and we fuck, usually this will go on for a few weeks or months.

    I usually feel bad but I wouldn't do that to a real good friend but I have to acquaintances.

    Been a long time since I did that and not so sure I'd do that now a days




    Just wait until your fiance does it to you.

    Just be sure to post it here so we can all laugh.
  15. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    CNN
    This is the most dangerous thing Donald Trump said over the weekend
    Analysis by Chris Cillizza, CNN Editor-at-large


    Donald Trump's pledge to consider pardoning those arrested on January 6 if he wins the presidency again in 2024 drew most of the headlines over the weekend. But it was something else he said in a free-form (and fact-free) campaign-style speech in Texas on Saturday night that really deserves more of your attention.

    Talking about the various ongoing investigations into him, his family and their business, Trump said this:

    "If these radical, vicious, racist prosecutors do anything wrong or illegal, I hope we are going to have in this country the biggest protests we have ever had in Washington, D.C., in New York, in Atlanta and elsewhere because our country and our elections are corrupt."

    Saying that -- I hope we have major protests if I get indicted or worse -- is irresponsible for any leader. Saying it in this moment -- just over a year removed from January 6, 2021? Downright dangerous.

    Why? Because we -- and Trump -- know that there is a sizable chunk of the public who believed (and believe) his lie that the 2020 election was stolen from him. A Quinnipiac University poll conducted earlier this month showed that 7 in 10 Republicans believed there was widespread fraud in the 2020 election. (There is zero evidence to back up that claim.)

    And some not just believed it, but were willing to act on it, storming the US Capitol just more than a year ago in an attempt to stop the counting of the Electoral College vote. The riot left five people dead, more than 100 police officers wounded and led to hundreds of arrests of those who breached the building.

    Trump -- and those closest to him -- have insisted that when he told the crowd gathered for the "Stop the Steal" rally near the White House on January 6 that "Republicans have to get tougher. You're not going to have a Republican Party if you don't get tougher," he wasn't inciting them.

    Which, well, no. But, even if you buy that, there's simply no way that you can conclude that Trump is doing anything other than prepping his supporters for more protests if/when he and his family are indicted or prosecuted.

    He can't play innocent this time. Because he's seen what happened after he gave that speech on January 6 last year. He now knows -- if he didn't before -- that his supporters are capable of violence and bloodshed.

    To know all of that and still say what Trump said over the weekend is titanically irresponsible. It's priming the pump for a repeat of what we saw last January. And for what? Because Trump is afraid of the potential legal problems facing him and his family?

    What should happen next is that every member of Republican leadership should issue a condemnation of this sort of behavior. And pledge to support whatever decisions the legal system makes as fair and equitable.

    That probably won't happen, though. Why? Well, because elected Republicans are afraid of Trump -- and their own party base, which is unstintingly loyal to the former president. And so, the likes of Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell and House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy will likely try to ignore Trump's latest dangerous words -- acting as though they somehow missed them or don't feel the need to comment on them.

    Sure. That makes sense, politically speaking. But if and when the Trump base rises up violently again, the GOP leaders won't get to say they didn't play a role in allowing it to happen.
  16. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    NBC News
    Taking unvaccinated man off heart transplant list is tragic — but ethical
    Opinion by J. Russell Teagarden and Arthur L. Caplan


    Taking unvaccinated man off heart transplant list is tragic — but ethical

    D.J. Ferguson, a 31-year-old father of two children with a third on the way, was lying near death at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston last week. He was waiting for a heart transplant, and his failing heart put him high on the transplant eligibility list. But then the hospital removed him from the list because he is not vaccinated against Covid-19. As tragic as this is likely to be for Ferguson and his family, we think the hospital made the right decision.

    Organs are always in very short supply, forcing hospitals and transplant teams to decide who gets them. Hospitals rightly place considerable importance on which recipients are likely to live longer and better, preventing the waste of a precious resource and building trust that transplantation processes are consistent, reasonable and fair. The likelihood of transplant success is based, in part, on transplant candidates’ susceptibility to infections — an important cause of death after heart transplants. Ferguson’s decision not to get vaccinated against Covid makes him more susceptible to such infections.

    Professional transplantation societies, such as the American Society of Transplantation, have recommended that any solid organ transplant candidate be vaccinated against all possible infections, including Covid. Many hospitals doing transplants have adopted these recommendations. The Brigham and Women’s vaccination requirements are a matter of public record, so the requirements should not surprise anyone.

    Accordingly, in picking who gets a heart, hospitals have made vaccination one of a variety of considerations. That is not bias against the unvaccinated. It is trying to save the most lives with a scarce organ supply.

    Covid vaccination requirements for transplant candidates are not addressing theoretical concerns. Researchers analyzing outcomes of solid organ transplant patients have found that more of them with Covid infections at the time of transplantation died in the hospital, more required mechanical ventilation, and more required time in ICUs than patients not infected.

    Another consideration involves donor families. The decision to donate an organ can be excruciating, as most viable organs become available when an otherwise healthy person dies suddenly. The grieving family may have only a matter of hours after it is informed of the death of their loved one to decide whether to donate organs. In many instances, families agree to this because they know they can contribute to extending the lives of others who would perish for lack of organs.

    Families who make decisions to donate are owed rationing policies that make the most out of their gifts. A family would in all likelihood feel aggrieved if the organ they agreed to donate went to a candidate with less of a chance to benefit than others, especially when those chances were diminished by a personal decision not to vaccinate.

    Transplant centers also have to consider what offering organ transplants to unvaccinated candidates signals about their commitment to thoughtful use of their services and patient safety. Would this willingness make their constituencies wonder what other policies and processes work against the public good and individuals? Disregarding clinical evidence and standards of care concerning vaccination requirements for transplant candidates could make people wonder.

    All this is to say that in general terms, giving a lower priority to people seeking solid organ transplantation who are not vaccinated against Covid is justifiable on ethical and clinical grounds. These general terms do not preclude consideration of individual patient circumstances that could yield exceptions to the Covid vaccination requirement. But from what we know about Ferguson’s case, should Brigham and Women’s make an exception for him? Our answer is no.

    Had Ferguson’s heart failure arisen unexpectedly from a devastating heart attack, then time would not have allowed Covid vaccination in advance of transplantation. However, he had reasons to have been vaccinated before such an event, which does not make an exemption from the vaccination requirement reasonable. And Ferguson’s predicament probably did not arise overnight; he needs a heart transplant because of a hereditary condition causing heart failure.

    Ferguson is young, with a still-expanding family. This scenario matters in the calculation, as well. When everything else is equal, Ferguson’s youth and family situation ought to get priority. But given how many vaccinated people need transplants and the importance of transplantation system integrity, Ferguson’s family situation is not sufficient to prioritize him for a transplant, especially considering he made the choice not to be vaccinated.

    Family members report two different reasons for Ferguson’s not getting vaccinated. His father said vaccination was “against his basic principles, he really doesn’t believe in it. ... It’s his body, it’s his choice.” His mother says, “There are some adverse reactions he read about given his condition, and he made his decision.” Neither of these rationales is persuasive. Adverse vaccine reactions are the least of a transplant candidates’ worries. And standing on principle if it means lowering your chances of living means it is time to rethink your principles.

    As the pandemic enters its third year, most of the public has had the opportunity to become educated about it. Ferguson’s mother, a trained nurse, confirmed that her son “is an informed patient.”

    As his mother also said, Ferguson made his choice. Choices have consequences, sometimes very tragic consequences. In the meantime, Ferguson agreed to a left ventricular assist device, which should buy him enough time to get vaccinated. Let’s hope he rethinks his choice with the time he has been given.
  17. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Newsweek
    Donald Trump Just Said the Quiet Part Out Loud
    Ewan Palmer


    Donald Trump has been accused of saying the "quiet part out loud" after suggesting Mike Pence should have "overturned the election" last January 6, but "unfortunately" failed to do so during his role as presiding officer of the Senate.

    In a statement on Sunday night, Trump was denouncing bipartisan efforts to update the Electoral Count Act of 1887 to make it clear that a vice president doesn't have the constitutional or legal power to prevent election results from being certified.

    However, Trump interpreted the proposals as a way to prevent VPs from being able to change the outcome of the results, once again falsely suggesting Pence therefor had the power to do so.

    "If the Vice President (Mike Pence) had 'absolutely no right' to change the Presidential Election results in the Senate, despite fraud and many other irregularities, how come the Democrats and RINO Republicans, like Wacky Susan Collins, are desperately trying to pass legislation that will not allow the Vice President to change the results of the election?" Trump said.

    "Actually, what they are saying, is that Mike Pence did have the right to change the outcome, and they now want to take that right away. Unfortunately, he didn't exercise that power, he could have overturned the Election!"

    While the former president has been falsely claiming the 2020 Election was "rigged" against him for more than 14 months now, his latest statement was the first time that he has let slip that his voter fraud cries were part of intentions to completely overturn the results in his favor.

    A number of critics, lawmakers and journalists now have condemned Trump's comments in which he specifically states that his attempts to put pressure on Pence to prevent the votes from being certified in Congress were part of an effort to disregard the democratic results.

    Bill Kristol, a political commentator and advisor in President Ronald Reagan's administration, tweeted: "Talk about saying the quiet part loud. Trump here admits or rather boasts that what he wanted Mike Pence to do was to 'overturn the election.'"

    The New York Times' Maggie Haberman also said Trump was "saying the quiet part out loud" about overturning an election with his latest comments.

    Rep. Adam Kinzinger, one of two Republican members of the House committee investigating the attack on the Capitol, said that Trump's remarks are an "admission" and a "massively un-American" statement.

    "It is time for every Republican leader to pick a side...Trump or the Constitution, there is no middle on defending our nation anymore," Kinzinger tweeted.

    Olivia Troye, a former national security official and ex-advisor to Pence, tweeted: "Trump boasting in his latest statement: the goal was to overturn the election—after touting at his rally that he'll pardon Jan 6 insurrectionists. Every Republican candidate & official should go on record with their answer: Do you support sedition & pardoning domestic terrorists?"

    NBC News' senior national political reporter Sahil Kapur added: "Two important developments here (1) This is the first time Trump has weighed in on the bipartisan talks about stopping election subversion; we'll see if it affects GOP sens.

    "(2): He's more openly using phrases like 'change the outcome' and VP 'could have overturned the Election.'"

    While this is the first time that Trump has openly revealed that he wanted Pence to overturn the election results, it is by far the first time he has falsely claimed his vice president had the power to stop the results being certified on January 6.

    In the days prior to the Capitol attack, Trump was putting pressure on Pence to prevent the results from being certified in Congress despite the fact he did not have the power to do so during his purely ceremonial role as presiding officer of the Senate.

    On January 5, 2021, Trump tweeted that Pence "has the power to reject fraudulently chosen electors" and previously told a crowd at a rally in Georgia in support of then senators Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue how he hopes Pence "comes through for us" and stops the results from being declared in favor of Joe Biden.

    Even as his supporters were storming the Capitol building on January 6, Trump tweeted that Pence "didn't have the courage to do what should have been done" and stop results from being certified.

    Pence released a statement just before the joint session of Congress to count the votes to state that there is no constitutional basis to Trump's claims that he can stop the ballots being certified.

    "As a student of history who loves the Constitution and reveres its Framers, I do not believe that the Founders of our country intended to invest the Vice President with unilateral authority to decide which electoral votes should be counted during the Joint Session of Congress, and no Vice President in American history has ever asserted such authority," Pence said.

    "It is my considered judgment that my oath to support and defend the Constitution constrains me from claiming unilateral authority to determine which electoral votes should be counted and which should not."
  18. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Jealous?
  19. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    The truth leaves Shlomo speechless.
  20. stl1 Cum Lickin' Fagit
    Originally posted by CandyRein Nigga I'm not tryna be barefoot and pregnant…my man and i will be traveling the world…




    God didn't give you those big old mammaries just for me to wank to!

    lol
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 29
  6. 30
  7. 31
  8. 32
  9. 33
  10. 34
  11. ...
  12. 730
  13. 731
  14. 732
  15. 733
Jump to Top