User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 695
  6. 696
  7. 697
  8. 698
  9. 699
  10. 700
  11. ...
  12. 3231
  13. 3232
  14. 3233
  15. 3234

Posts by Jiggaboo_Johnson

  1. You can't answer it can you...because you have NO data...only conspiracy nuttiness...

    BILLLLLLLLIOOONS dispensed...

    30 or so DIRECT deaths?

    Lets do the risk calculation shall we?

    Talk about retardedness

    "uh yeah my passenger door window motor doesn't work either...WE HAVE THE PROOF!"
  2. Originally posted by aldra "if I paint my car red, it becomes red and no longer a car"

    delivery does not change what you wrote. I'm not interested in playing your whiny J'ewish word games.





    who would benefit from 'directly linking the vaccine to deaths'? who has the money and access to investigate that link? if someone dies, most doctors will refuse to even entertain the idea thanks to how reliant they are on confidence in the pharmaceutical industry in general.

    how would you perform such an investigation when doctors, by nature of their profession, are diametrically opposed to it?

    "the 'vaccines' can't have bad effects because the authorities haven't admitted it!"

    or

    "why are you shitting on my floor?"
    "how do you know it's shit, it hasn't even come out yet!"
    as a man wearing nothing but a white coat squats on your rug with his cheeks pulled apart


    what we do have is -

    - a system of statistics that count any death that had a positive COVID test within 2 weeks as being killed by COVID
    - serum levels in sewage showing that general viral load is now higher than 2020-2021
    - higher excess deaths than at the 'peak' of COVID hysteria (NOT attributed to COVID)
    - statistically massive spike of athletes and children suffering cardiac events
    - admissions from Pfizer and Moderna that effectiveness was never 95%, it's closer to 20%
    - admissions that none of the therapies actually prevented infection or spread, only reduced symptoms
    - admissions that the 'vaccines' have virtually no effect on children under 16, to the extent that they're more likely to experience side-effects than COVID effects
    - multiple studies showing that the M'RNA injections actually flood your system with spike proteins than initially stated, and that they persist for weeks, even longer in the gonads, liver and spleen
    - multiple studies showing that the flood of spikes eventually dulls the immune response leading to the body 'tolerating' similar viruses, leading to waves of infection and re-infection

    ironically, the people virtue-signaling about boosting up to 'protect other people' are likely to be fueling the virus' rapid evolution ala Marek's Disease

    In case you missed it:

    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson It's a simple question…how about you answer it rather than trying to deflect?

    You guys seem convinced the vaccine is killing lots of people…what's your proof/source for this other than retarded conspiracy nuttiness?

    BILLIONS of vaccines dispensed…how many deaths DIRECTLY linked to use of the vaccine?
  3. Originally posted by I Live In Your Crawlspace Secretly4 You're 1 sick puppy!

    Do you have the cure?
  4. That powdery shit gets everywhere.
  5. Originally posted by Rape Monster You want those 105 lb skeleton girls?

    Exwife #2 when I met her was mid 120s.."we" managed to get her down to 98lb by the time of divorce by good diet/exercise and psychological abuse. She was 5'5"...at mid 120s she certainly had 'extra' flesh on her (by my standards). When sitting on my lap I'd grab her belly and have the natural fold in my hand and say "jesus fatty"...at 98lbs her body was as tight as a jedis purse and you couldn't do that.
  6. Originally posted by Rape Monster 130 pounds isn't thick unless they are under 5 ft

    I guess it depends on what you personally consider thick. 133lbs is pretty high for what I like.
  7. the dollar store has some "personal" Quiches in their freezer section last weekend...I thought about getting a couple but didn't...if they still have em this weekend I'll pick a couple up, though I doubt they will, the local Hispanics tend to jump all over something "new" and buy them all up.
  8. Personally not a fan of them myself...too much powdery shit on them. I don't mind tortilla chips for dipping purposes though.
  9. I'm not American.
  10. Originally posted by aldra how many deaths or wacky babies were caused by thalidomide before they finally pulled it? asbestos?


    It's a simple question...how about you answer it rather than trying to deflect?

    You guys seem convinced the vaccine is killing lots of people...what's your proof/source for this other than retarded conspiracy nuttiness?

    BILLIONS of vaccines dispensed...how many deaths DIRECTLY linked to use of the vaccine?
  11. Originally posted by aldra that's not what sarcasm is.

    Yeah it is

    Sarcasm is the caustic use of words, often in a humorous way, to mock someone or something.[1] Sarcasm may employ ambivalence,[2] although it is not necessarily ironic.[3] Most noticeable in spoken word, sarcasm is mainly distinguished by the inflection with which it is spoken[4] or, with an undercurrent of irony, by the extreme disproportion of the comment to the situation, and is largely context-dependent.[5]
  12. Originally posted by mmQ Not if it's been hard boiled beforehand.

    The shell will still crack gumby.

    What you should have said is

    "Not if it was in a near zero G environment"
  13. Those faux brick homes that are basically a wooden home with 1 layer of brick on the outside for aesthetics...that's not a brick home.
  14. Originally posted by Ghost well it's not like you would know if it had a wood frame unless you could inspect it

    If you own your home you KNOW how it's constructed and you KNOW the building techniques used in the home construction if you have spent ANY time researching your home before you buy it and ANY time maintaining your home.

    example: Replace a window you can see it's just brick..no wood. Install a new damp course...you can see it's brick.

    My home for example we were installing a new damp course a few weeks after we moved in, the builder found a problem and had basically remove an area of wall (which guess what...was just BRICK).

    I understand you are only going by your own personal experience but no...a traditional BRICK home does NOT have a wooden frame...new shitty faux brick homes might though!
  15. These chingchongs know how to do it. concrete and brick, will still be standing in 200yrs.

  16. Here you go, typical brick home in my home town...Over 100yrs old and not a wooden frame in sight



    https://housesforsaletorent.co.uk/property/for-sale/3-bedroom-end-terrace-house-for-sale-in-worsley-road-swinton-manchester-m27/4683073/
  17. Building shitting wooden homes is to keep costs down...most wont be around in 150yrs..My BRICK home in England was build in the late 19th century and is still standing.
  18. Originally posted by Ghost what do you think they put the bricks around

    err...not wood. You have SOME wood for flooring and roof but not a wooden frame in a REAL brick home. The primary component is BRICK!

    My house back in England didn't have ANY wooden framing in the walls, it was two layers of brick (with a couple of inches gap between the two) with plaster stuck directly to the brick on the inside...(none of that sheet rock crap)
  19. Originally posted by mmQ I agree. Your third party perspective, as predictable as it was, is duly noted. Thank you sir.

    Well of course it's predictable...You drop an egg from 10ft onto concrete it's going to crack...predictability.
  20. 133lb is pretty good for a thick woman.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 695
  6. 696
  7. 697
  8. 698
  9. 699
  10. 700
  11. ...
  12. 3231
  13. 3232
  14. 3233
  15. 3234
Jump to Top