User Controls

Posts by literally bundy

  1. can someone send Bill Krozby to prison already
  2. weed doesnt make you trip balls and possibly die

    thats what im saying. cannibinoids are basically crack pcp, but a partial agonist like THC doesnt create a dramatic effect like that
  3. oh ok

    my drugs are wearing off im getting bored of arguing with retards now
  4. Originally posted by Malice Quoted.

    have you ever smoked a synthetic cannabinoid?
  5. nitpicking small portions out of large responses to create a comeback is a critical sign of being destroyed in an argument btw
  6. Originally posted by WhiskeyPhoenix This clear concentrate my friend has is no joke, taking any more than one big hit even with a tolerance will put you into a pseudo-psychedelic state. My buddy has a massive tolerance and he did a hit where he dabbed it directly from the syringe and almost fell out before I got him to sit down. Crazy how far weed science has gone for us to have stuff like this.

    cannabinoids are pretty much the most addictive drugs ever. the things that stop weed and Crouton from being heroin/spice tier addictive is partial agonism vs full agonism
  7. >autistic
    >sociopathic

    omfg like whats the difference even
  8. Originally posted by aldra I didn't use it for anything but shitposting and following locals in warzones, I don't really see the point

    so i can harass you uwu
  9. Originally posted by aldra diagram is inaccurate. they should be touching tip to tip, not side by side

    make a new FB or ur not really a chink autist loser
  10. Originally posted by aldra A challenger enters the ring! How will motherpunching stack up against a double-dose of mid-functioning autism?

    your dad abused you (sexually) and now you post on totse to sort out your trauma

    Originally posted by Malice Sploo, check this out. You’re racially inferior, just like I am. You come from an inbred Muslim population, greatly increasing your risk for genetic deformities.

    https://www.google.com/search?q=turkey+inbreeding&oq=turkey+inbreeding&aqs=chrome..69i57j0.5310j0j7&client=ms-android-sprint-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

    You can’t argue against this.

    you literally do not understand that global trends do not apply to individuals. you cannot internalize the process of correlation does not = causation, that's why you're not a real scientist. you're a reddit scientist who copy pastes pubmed articles without any genuine understanding of the content.



    Originally posted by Captain Falcon Super Malice Vs Sploo II Turbo: Aspie Vs Retard Gold Edition

    muhhhh PIN
  11. Originally posted by Malice It’s the next evolution of sploo, 4 edges!

    but a four edged shape can just be made out of two right triangles. there is no evolution from perfection, only superfluous concepts with perfection as their core
  12. did you know evolution isn't a selective thing? evolution doesnt make any choices on its own, it can only be described in retrospect.

    clearly all of these fag emotions are important but that's just the generic app roach. subdivisions of ethics as well as the ethics of being unethical have continued into the modern period because these strategies can work, if your other faculties are intact or even superior. the typical mating strategy doesn't mean it's the "superior" one, it just means its the default, as in most people would fail without it. exceptional people like myself dont need ethics to continue the lineage, and in day to day life it provides me advantages, because i can disregard others to further my own hedonism. also just because a behavior is the typical way currently, doesn't mean it will always be.

    besides that, the concept of ethics can just be considered a vague sense of morality that even a mouse has, the philosophy of ethics which lanny is more interested in, is less about these primitive impulses (which you always try to use to support your reasoning), and more about psuedointellectual masturbation which lanny is deeply fluent in and has learned all of the lexicon of to pose arguments that are not genuinely arguments in any logical way
  13. Originally posted by Enter i like the square

    it's hip to be square

    even the name is fucking cool. "SQUARE". like really think about it. it's fuckin'… well…. square! :P hahahahahahah

    But squares are useful as fuck, they're everywhere. I'm even posting in a square right now.

    SQUARE

    thats deep as fuck man

    im going to spend years on end studying your words
  14. Originally posted by Vizier Guess I got rekt.

    ggwp

    quoted
  15. Originally posted by Lanny Holy shit, you actually think there's some argument to be had about which shape is the most profound, don't you?

    yeah there actually is. considering your interest in philosophy, we can translate this to "profound sounding mumbo-jumbo" basically you just have to sound like you know what you're talking about. if i propose a quasi-logical argument for why a shape is more profound, the only possible counterargument you can propose is something equally quasi-logical. Of course we can't get into actually logical discussions because then it wouldn't be philosophy anymore
  16. vids or murder or i cant cum/dont care
  17. Originally posted by Malice Ethics is a pretty important part of life for us civilized folks, sploo. You may not understand that because you’re more of a wild animal.

    I’d say understanding the importance of not creating life and how terrible this all really is was worth it alone.

    but a lack of ethics is just as valid as a convoluted system of ethics, because of what the subject is, entirely subjective

    >civilized folks

    is that like comparing an autist who's been mistreated in every aspect of life and has never harmed another human being, threatening to shoot up malls to validate his own rejection, to someone who beats up his mom whenever she annoys him because she's annoying?

    if anything it just sounds like you're a bitch, trying to rationalize being bitchmade by a meaningless and inherently contradictory system of morality
  18. Originally posted by Lanny YOUR TRIANGLE DOESNT HAVE AS MANY EDGES AS MY TRIANGLE YOU LOSER!!!

    you basically nullified your point.

    if you're trying to find a profound meaning in a geometric object, theres no point in taking it beyond a triangle because any object beyond that can just be a construction of a triangle.

    good job sounding retarded attempting to point out retardation. that must be 6 different levels of failure. a meta-failure, perhaps? i know the buzzword meta gives you psuedointellectuals a boner
  19. Originally posted by Lanny *low IQ posting*

    have you ever learned anything important from philosophy that is actually immediately applicable towards solving problems in real life

    i'm a genius, remember? you attempting to counteract all of my critical comments will only show how weak and shallow your thinking really is
Jump to Top