Originally posted by Elbow
And who would not want a relationship of mutual respect with jedis? Only a fool.
I would turn their lights off for them on the Sabbath because I respect people with deep theological convictions.
But I still don't think The State of Israel should exist, it's totally illegal (not like I care about the law) I don't think any state should exist and honestly if the hebrews can pull off this genocide than they have pretty much earned the right to conquer that land in my opinion but I will not cry when they get nuked one day because that real estate is just way too valuable
All states have an expiration date
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
The reason I didn’t talk about chastity in my book is because Church teaching is clear on that matter, and it’s well-known in the “LGBT” community. I don’t think there’s any “LGBT” Catholic alive who doesn’t understand that teaching. By the same token, there seem to be few “LGBT” Catholics who have accepted that teaching. Theologically speaking, you could say the teaching has not been “received” by the “LGBT” community, to whom it was directed. So rather than focusing on a topic where the two groups — the institutional church and the “LGBT” community — are miles and miles apart, I preferred to try to build a bridge over areas that could be places of common ground. And as for “respect, compassion and sensitivity,” one can always employ those virtues even when one is in disagreement with the other person. If you’re a bishop who is speaking to an “LGBT” person who disagrees with Church teaching, you can still treat him or her with respect, and the “LGBT” person can do the same with the bishop. As for calling them specifically to chastity, it’s important to remember we are all called to chastity, so that is part of everyone’s call as a Christian and as a Catholic. So that virtue is not something that applies only to the “LGBT” person
if you have a problem with pedophile priests than either become a Catholic and do something about it or mind your own beeswax pal
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Speedy Parker
I support any nation defending its civilians from unwarranted aggression by terrorists who hide behind non military targets.
Look up "The Hannibal Directive"
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
I've been pretty negative about Elon's changes on 𝕏.com but this is finally a step in the right direction
Originally posted by the man who put it in my hood
LMAO seethe leftists I told you LANNY web3 is coming better submit that pull now or be left behind in the dust of the metaverse
The character "𝕏" (U+1D54F) is part of the Mathematical Double-Struck Capital Letters block in Unicode. Its technical name is "𝕏" (MATHEMATICAL DOUBLE-STRUCK CAPITAL X), and it's often used in mathematical contexts to represent sets or abstract objects, like the symbol for a particular space in algebra or topology.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Despite the general-purpose quantum computing field still being in its early stages, with no immediate risk to modern cryptographic systems, scientists are increasingly exploring specialized quantum computers for potential uses — and, in the case of cybersecurity, vulnerabilities. In their recent study, Wang’s team utilized a quantum computer from Canada’s D-Wave Systems to breach cryptographic algorithms, marking a significant milestone.
According to SCMP, the research team employed the D-Wave Advantage quantum computer to target the Present, Gift-64, and Rectangle algorithms, called key representatives of the Substitution-Permutation Network (SPN) structure. This structure is foundational for advanced encryption standards (AES), a system widely deployed in military and financial encryption protocols, according to the newspaper. While AES-256 is often labeled as military-grade and considered the most secure encryption standard available, the study suggests that quantum computers may soon threaten such security
Infosec experts are throwing cold water on reports that Chinese researchers successfully cracked RSA encryption using quantum computers from D-Wave.
In a recently published paper titled "Quantum Annealing Public Key Cryptographic Attack Algorithm Based on D-Wave Advantage," academic researchers from Shanghai University described two methods to break RSA encryption. Both methods incorporate quantum annealing, an optimization process used in D-Wave systems and cloud services.
"Quantum annealing is the fundamental principle behind D-Wave special quantum computing. It has a unique quantum tunneling effect that can jump out of the local extremes that traditional intelligent algorithms are prone to fall into," the researchers wrote.
The paper – which is primarily written in Chinese – was initially published in May, but recent media reports on the research have caused a stir in the infosec community. Encryption experts say that while the research might be valid, the devil is in the details.
Where did they even find those bastard letters? And it turns out their math sucks too. Bitcoin is probably fine, these chinks don't know anything.
Frederic Jacobs, an engineer on Apple's Security Engineering and Architecture team, said in a post on Mastodon that the research hasn't changed the practical security of RSA encryption. "Yes, you have reasons to migrate away from RSA to post-quantum hybrids, but it has nothing to do with D-Wave or this algorithm," he wrote.
phew
STARKs
STARKS stands for “zero-knowledge scalable transparent argument of knowledge.” It’s a type of cryptographic proof that requires little to no interaction between the prover and the verifier. The key advantages of STARKs over SNARKs are that they have fast prover times and are easier to scale as they offer more computing power. Also, using hash functions makes them quantum resistant.
Notably, STARKs were invented by Eli Ben-Sasson, the co-founder of StarkWare, the team building StarkEx and StarkNet.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
