aretha franklin is not amused she has had 20 boosters this week but y'all mask wearing unvaccinated people walking up to her like shes SUPERWOMAN like just because she's a famous black singer that took 10x the recommended or safe dose of JAY AND JAY that doesn't mean she can't drop dead from THE SILLY VIRUS
it's called the funny laughing virus for a reason because even if you war a mask and get shot you can still DIE from covid like thats how serious this is/
Nothing is safe you fucking doomers STAY AT HOME do not go outside ever again unless it's to get another booster shot. The question i'm asking is who the fuck is she is even talking about because it's a ghost town out there only a few dozen humans left on earth that haven't had the shot so lets round them up and finish them off am i rite folx????
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Wariat
ok now they are playing karaoke in there and fucking polish disco polo music.
people watcher
eople watching is the act of observing people, sometimes done with the purpose of supplementing activities such as sketching. However, for most, it as an interesting pastime. WikiHow has a guide to the activity. The nine-step process begins with ...
Read more at: https://www.deccanherald.com/metrolife/metrolifWikiHow has a guide to the activity. The nine-step process begins with deciding the parameters and emphasises on the importance of natural observation over intrusive nosiness. Next, they advice the readers to to select a location and a person to obse...
Originally posted by stl1
Just a note: Most things of any value require more than a single word (as most of my posts show).
Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures.13 However, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies suggest that achieving the plasma concentrations necessary for the antiviral efficacy detected in vitro would require administration of doses up to 100-fold higher than those approved for use in humans.14,15 Even though ivermectin appears to accumulate in the lung tissue, predicted systemic plasma and lung tissue concentrations are much lower than 2 µM, the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro.16-19 Subcutaneous administration of ivermectin 400 µg/kg had no effect on SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in hamsters. However, there was a reduction in olfactory deficit (measured using a food-finding test) and a reduction in the interleukin (IL)-6:IL-10 ratio in lung tissues.20
Since the last revision of this section of the Guidelines, the results of several randomized trials and retrospective cohort studies of ivermectin use in patients with COVID-19 have been published in peer-reviewed journals or have been made available as manuscripts ahead of peer review. Some clinical studies showed no benefits or worsening of disease after ivermectin use,21-24 whereas others reported shorter time to resolution of disease manifestations that were attributed to COVID-19,25-27 greater reduction in inflammatory marker levels,26 shorter time to viral clearance,21 or lower mortality rates in patients who received ivermectin than in patients who received comparator drugs or placebo.21,27
However, most of these studies had incomplete information and significant methodological limitations, which make it difficult to exclude common causes of bias. These limitations include:
The sample size of most of the trials was small. Various doses and schedules of ivermectin were used. Some of the randomized controlled trials were open-label studies in which neither the participants nor the investigators were blinded to the treatment arms. Patients received various concomitant medications (e.g., doxycycline, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, zinc, corticosteroids) in addition to ivermectin or the comparator drug. This confounded the assessment of the efficacy or safety of ivermectin. The severity of COVID-19 in the study participants was not always well described. The study outcome measures were not always clearly defined.
that doesn't prove or disprove anything. You aren't a doctor.
Nobody here is a doctor and there is an unlimited amount of studies that disprove each other endlessly because science only gets done when someone pays for it. You are just playing into the agenda.
You know you fucked up when you fall into media conventions PEOPLE ARE ARGUING ABOUT IVERMECTIN SO I MUST ARGUE ABOUT IVERMECTIN IF THEY ARE AGAINST IT THAT MUST MEAN I SHOULD BE FOR IT
This stopped being about science, public health and safety long ago. None of you people give a shit about any of that and are just co-opting this disaster into your political narrative.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
I would use all of earths precious metals and stones to make a big flat space disc like a bling bling and launch that shit FAR so it's gone forever and laugh at the global copper and iron shortage.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by RIPtotse
Fona I have a place for you if you want to move to St. Louis. I’ll rent my finished basement to you for 300-400 a month.
Pm me and we’ll talk if you want. I’m about to start fall semester at college and should be buying a car today going to look at 2 so I’m not even home all that much but it’s amazingly clean and 2 bedroom 2 bath, you’d have the finished basement and your own bathroom/shower.
Hmu
hts and I are interested and willing to pay more
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
